[Bug 216853] New: Getting ACPI errors on harddrive when booting up
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 Summary: Getting ACPI errors on harddrive when booting up Product: openSUSE 10.2 Version: Beta 1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel AssignedTo: kernel-maintainers@forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: mboman@novell.com QAContact: qa@suse.de When I boot up the machine, I get several ACPI errors relating to the harddrives. This does not happen on SLED10 which is also installed on the same machine. Once the machine boots up, there are no issues mounting the drives. I've got one SATA and 2 PATA drives in the machine. ata1: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x1F0 ctl 0x3F6 bmdma 0xFC00 irq 14 ata2: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x170 ctl 0x376 bmdma 0xFC08 irq 15 scsi0 : ata_piix ata1.00: ATA-7, max UDMA/100, 488397168 sectors: LBA48 ata1.00: ata1: dev 0 multi count 16 ata1.00: configured for UDMA/100 ACPI Error (dsopcode-0481): Attempt to CreateField of length zero [20060707] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.RATA] (Node dffeceb4), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.CHN0.DRV0._GTF] (Node dffec98c), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE scsi1 : ata_piix ata2.00: ATA-7, max UDMA/100, 488397168 sectors: LBA48 ata2.00: ata2: dev 0 multi count 16 ata2.01: ATAPI, max UDMA/33 ata2.00: configured for UDMA/100 ata2.01: configured for UDMA/33 ACPI Error (dsopcode-0481): Attempt to CreateField of length zero [20060707] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.RATA] (Node dffeceb4), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.CHN1.DRV0._GTF] (Node dffec8c4), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ACPI Error (dsopcode-0481): Attempt to CreateField of length zero [20060707] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.RATA] (Node dffeceb4), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.CHN1.DRV1._GTF] (Node dffecfcc), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE Vendor: ATA Model: ST3250823A Rev: 3.01 Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 SCSI device sda: 488397168 512-byte hdwr sectors (250059 MB) sda: Write Protect is off sda: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back SCSI device sda: 488397168 512-byte hdwr sectors (250059 MB) sda: Write Protect is off sda: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back sda: sda1 sd 0:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sda Vendor: ATA Model: ST3250823A Rev: 3.01 Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 SCSI device sdb: 488397168 512-byte hdwr sectors (250059 MB) sdb: Write Protect is off sd 0:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg0 type 0 sdb: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 SCSI device sdb: drive cache: write back SCSI device sdb: 488397168 512-byte hdwr sectors (250059 MB) sdb: Write Protect is off sdb: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 SCSI device sdb: drive cache: write back sdb:<3>ata2.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen ata2.00: (BMDMA stat 0x64) ata2.00: tag 0 cmd 0xc8 Emask 0x2 stat 0x58 err 0x0 (HSM violation) ata2: soft resetting port ata2.00: configured for UDMA/100 ata2.01: configured for UDMA/33 ACPI Error (dsopcode-0481): Attempt to CreateField of length zero [20060707] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.RATA] (Node dffeceb4), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.CHN1.DRV0._GTF] (Node dffec8c4), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ACPI Error (dsopcode-0481): Attempt to CreateField of length zero [20060707] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.RATA] (Node dffeceb4), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.CHN1.DRV1._GTF] (Node dffecfcc), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ata2: EH complete ata2.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen ata2.00: (BMDMA stat 0x64) ata2.00: tag 0 cmd 0xc8 Emask 0x4 stat 0x40 err 0x0 (timeout) ata2: soft resetting port ata2.00: configured for UDMA/100 ata2.01: configured for UDMA/33 ACPI Error (dsopcode-0481): Attempt to CreateField of length zero [20060707] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.RATA] (Node dffeceb4), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.CHN1.DRV0._GTF] (Node dffec8c4), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ACPI Error (dsopcode-0481): Attempt to CreateField of length zero [20060707] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.RATA] (Node dffeceb4), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.CHN1.DRV1._GTF] (Node dffecfcc), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ata2: EH complete ata2.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen ata2.00: (BMDMA stat 0x64) ata2.00: tag 0 cmd 0xc8 Emask 0x4 stat 0x40 err 0x0 (timeout) ata2: soft resetting port ata2.00: configured for UDMA/100 ata2.01: configured for UDMA/33 ACPI Error (dsopcode-0481): Attempt to CreateField of length zero [20060707] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.RATA] (Node dffeceb4), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.CHN1.DRV0._GTF] (Node dffec8c4), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ACPI Error (dsopcode-0481): Attempt to CreateField of length zero [20060707] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.RATA] (Node dffeceb4), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.CHN1.DRV1._GTF] (Node dffecfcc), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ata2: EH complete ata2.00: limiting speed to UDMA/66 ata2.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen ata2.00: (BMDMA stat 0x64) ata2.00: tag 0 cmd 0xc8 Emask 0x4 stat 0x40 err 0x0 (timeout) ata2: soft resetting port ata2.00: configured for UDMA/66 ata2.01: configured for UDMA/33 ACPI Error (dsopcode-0481): Attempt to CreateField of length zero [20060707] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.RATA] (Node dffeceb4), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.CHN1.DRV0._GTF] (Node dffec8c4), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ACPI Error (dsopcode-0481): Attempt to CreateField of length zero [20060707] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.RATA] (Node dffeceb4), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.CHN1.DRV1._GTF] (Node dffecfcc), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ata2: EH complete ata2.00: limiting speed to UDMA/44 ata2.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen ata2.00: (BMDMA stat 0x64) ata2.00: tag 0 cmd 0xc8 Emask 0x4 stat 0x40 err 0x0 (timeout) ata2: soft resetting port ata2.00: configured for UDMA/44 ata2.01: configured for UDMA/33 ACPI Error (dsopcode-0481): Attempt to CreateField of length zero [20060707] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.RATA] (Node dffeceb4), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.CHN1.DRV0._GTF] (Node dffec8c4), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ACPI Error (dsopcode-0481): Attempt to CreateField of length zero [20060707] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.RATA] (Node dffeceb4), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.CHN1.DRV1._GTF] (Node dffecfcc), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ata2: EH complete ata2.00: limiting speed to UDMA/33 ata2.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen ata2.00: (BMDMA stat 0x64) ata2.00: tag 0 cmd 0xc8 Emask 0x4 stat 0x40 err 0x0 (timeout) ata2: soft resetting port ata2.00: configured for UDMA/33 ata2.01: configured for UDMA/33 ACPI Error (dsopcode-0481): Attempt to CreateField of length zero [20060707] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.RATA] (Node dffeceb4), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.CHN1.DRV0._GTF] (Node dffec8c4), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ACPI Error (dsopcode-0481): Attempt to CreateField of length zero [20060707] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.RATA] (Node dffeceb4), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.CHN1.DRV1._GTF] (Node dffecfcc), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE sd 1:0:0:0: SCSI error: return code = 0x08000002 sdb: Current: sense key: Aborted Command Additional sense: No additional sense information end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 0 Buffer I/O error on device sdb, logical block 0 ata2: EH complete ata2.00: limiting speed to UDMA/25 ata2.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen ata2.00: (BMDMA stat 0x64) ata2.00: tag 0 cmd 0xc8 Emask 0x4 stat 0x40 err 0x0 (timeout) ata2: soft resetting port ata2.00: configured for UDMA/25 ata2.01: configured for UDMA/33 ACPI Error (dsopcode-0481): Attempt to CreateField of length zero [20060707] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.RATA] (Node dffeceb4), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.CHN1.DRV0._GTF] (Node dffec8c4), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ACPI Error (dsopcode-0481): Attempt to CreateField of length zero [20060707] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.RATA] (Node dffeceb4), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.CHN1.DRV1._GTF] (Node dffecfcc), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ata2: EH complete ata2.00: limiting speed to UDMA/16 ata2.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen ata2.00: (BMDMA stat 0x64) ata2.00: tag 0 cmd 0xc8 Emask 0x4 stat 0x40 err 0x0 (timeout) ata2: soft resetting port ata2.00: configured for UDMA/16 ata2.01: configured for UDMA/33 ACPI Error (dsopcode-0481): Attempt to CreateField of length zero [20060707] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.RATA] (Node dffeceb4), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.CHN1.DRV0._GTF] (Node dffec8c4), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ACPI Error (dsopcode-0481): Attempt to CreateField of length zero [20060707] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.RATA] (Node dffeceb4), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.CHN1.DRV1._GTF] (Node dffecfcc), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ata2: EH complete ata2.00: limiting speed to PIO4 ata2.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen ata2.00: (BMDMA stat 0x64) ata2.00: tag 0 cmd 0xc8 Emask 0x4 stat 0x40 err 0x0 (timeout) ata2: soft resetting port ata2.00: configured for PIO4 ata2.01: configured for UDMA/33 ACPI Error (dsopcode-0481): Attempt to CreateField of length zero [20060707] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.RATA] (Node dffeceb4), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.CHN1.DRV0._GTF] (Node dffec8c4), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ACPI Error (dsopcode-0481): Attempt to CreateField of length zero [20060707] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.RATA] (Node dffeceb4), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.CHN1.DRV1._GTF] (Node dffecfcc), AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE ata2: EH complete unable to read partition table sd 1:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sdb sd 1:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg1 type 0 Vendor: PIONEER Model: DVD-RW DVR-107D Rev: 1.13 Type: CD-ROM ANSI SCSI revision: 05 scsi 1:0:1:0: Attached scsi generic sg2 type 5 ata_piix 0000:00:1f.2: MAP [ P0 -- P1 -- ] ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:1f.2[A] -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 169 PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:00:1f.2 to 64 ata3: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xEFE0 ctl 0xEFAE bmdma 0xEF60 irq 169 ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xEFA0 ctl 0xEFAA bmdma 0xEF68 irq 169 scsi2 : ata_piix sr0: scsi3-mmc drive: 40x/40x writer cd/rw xa/form2 cdda tray Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20 sr 1:0:1:0: Attached scsi CD-ROM sr0 ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xEFE7 scsi3 : ata_piix ata4.00: ATA-7, max UDMA/133, 240121728 sectors: LBA ata4.00: ata4: dev 0 multi count 16 ata4.00: configured for UDMA/133 Vendor: ATA Model: Maxtor 6Y120M0 Rev: YAR5 Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 SCSI device sdc: 240121728 512-byte hdwr sectors (122942 MB) sdc: Write Protect is off sdc: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 SCSI device sdc: drive cache: write back SCSI device sdc: 240121728 512-byte hdwr sectors (122942 MB) sdc: Write Protect is off sdc: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 SCSI device sdc: drive cache: write back sdc: sdc1 sdc2 sdc3 sd 3:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sdc sd 3:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg3 type 0 BIOS EDD facility v0.16 2004-Jun-25, 3 devices found -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 ------- Comment #1 from mboman@novell.com 2006-10-31 19:48 MST ------- Actually, I can't see any partitions on SDB in openSUSE 10.2. Rebooting the machine to SLED10 will allow me to see and mount SDB1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 gregkh@novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|kernel- |trenn@novell.com |maintainers@forge.provo.nove| |ll.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 trenn@novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hare@novell.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Comment #2 from trenn@novell.com 2006-11-02 01:50 MST ------- Can you attach acpidump output also, pls. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 ------- Comment #3 from mboman@novell.com 2006-11-02 05:02 MST ------- Created an attachment (id=103498) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=103498&action=view) acpidump as requested -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 ------- Comment #4 from mboman@novell.com 2006-11-02 05:03 MST ------- Attached acpidump as requested -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 ------- Comment #5 from mboman@novell.com 2006-11-02 05:05 MST ------- Didn't include stderr in there; Stderr = Wrong checksum for generic table! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 trenn@novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Robert.Moore@intel.com Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |mboman@novell.com ------- Comment #6 from trenn@novell.com 2006-11-02 07:37 MST ------- acpidump gave "wrong checksum for generic table"? Ouch, this still may have something to do with my "provide possibility to override SSDTs" patch, even this does not seem to match the (S)ATA errors in dmesg (all SATA stuff seems to be declared in there). I somehow feel this is something else in the deeps of the ACPI interpreter, but not sure yet. Is it possible for you to catch the whole kernel boot/dmesg output. Can you also catch and attach a SLE10 or 10.1 full dmesg output. Pls also provide an acpidump from SLE10 (if comment #5 came from acpidump). Does the command work without errors there? The boot params ide_noacpi, possibly only the boot param ide_noacpionboot should make the errors go away and the disk should work then? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 trenn@novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|Robert.Moore@intel.com | ------- Comment #7 from trenn@novell.com 2006-11-02 07:38 MST ------- Sorry, not sure whether this is an ACPICA bug, yet. I didn't want to add Bob to CC yet, will do so after some more digging if it comes out to be an ACPICA problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 ------- Comment #8 from mboman@novell.com 2006-11-02 13:50 MST ------- Yes, acpidump indeed gave me that message. Does acpidump make any changes? Cause after a reboot, I can now see and access the partitions on the drive! I'm still getting ACPI errors while booting (although not as many as before) so attaching boot.msg. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 ------- Comment #9 from mboman@novell.com 2006-11-02 13:51 MST ------- Created an attachment (id=103600) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=103600&action=view) boot.msg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 ------- Comment #10 from mboman@novell.com 2006-11-02 14:04 MST ------- In SLED10; Run acpidump and got "wrong checksum for generic table". Run acpidump again and didn't get the error. I could still see and access the drive/partitions in SLED10. Then booting 10.2 and can't access the drive. Attaching a new boot.msg from 10.2 as well as 10.2 from SLED10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 mboman@novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #103600|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Comment #11 from mboman@novell.com 2006-11-02 14:06 MST ------- Created an attachment (id=103601) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=103601&action=view) boot.msg from 10.2 (not able to access partitions) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 ------- Comment #12 from mboman@novell.com 2006-11-02 14:07 MST ------- Created an attachment (id=103602) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=103602&action=view) boot.msg from SLED10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 mboman@novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED ------- Comment #13 from mboman@novell.com 2006-11-02 14:07 MST ------- Created an attachment (id=103603) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=103603&action=view) acpidump from SLED10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 trenn@novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |mboman@novell.com ------- Comment #14 from trenn@novell.com 2006-11-03 07:26 MST ------- Sorry that was my fault, I slipped into the wrong dir, (/tmp/linux-2.6..., /tmp/kernel_compiles/linux-2.6...) First: libata.ata_acpi=0 should workaround the bug for faster booting. I again placed a kernel tar in my home (same file, date: 03.11, 15:21). The steps: cp arch/i386/boot/bzImage /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18.1-default cp System.map /boot/System.map-2.6.18.1-default make modules_install cd /boot (to be sure you may want to do a depmod -F /boot/System.map-2.6.18.1-default here, but this should already be done) mkinitrd -k vmlinuz-2.6.18.1-default -i initrd-2.6.18.1-default Please attach dmesg output of this one then. The problem seems to be that libata calls _GTF function before _STM has been called. This is forbidden by ACPI spec. A possible other bug could be that _STM has been invoked with wrong values, but I doubt that... all this should be included in the debug output... Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 mboman@novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED ------- Comment #15 from mboman@novell.com 2006-11-03 13:46 MST ------- Created an attachment (id=103752) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=103752&action=view) Output of dmesg with debug info -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 ------- Comment #16 from mboman@novell.com 2006-11-06 04:36 MST ------- I'm attaching the output of two different dmesg outputs from the debug kernel. One is when it worked (ie. The machine booted up and I could see the partition) and one is when it did not work (ie the machine booted up and I could not see the partition). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 mboman@novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #103601|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #103752|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Comment #17 from mboman@novell.com 2006-11-06 04:39 MST ------- Created an attachment (id=103911) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=103911&action=view) Not able to see the partition -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 mboman@novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #103911|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Comment #18 from mboman@novell.com 2006-11-06 04:43 MST ------- Created an attachment (id=103912) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=103912&action=view) Output from dmesg when I can, and Can't see the partition -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 ------- Comment #20 from mboman@novell.com 2006-11-19 02:51 MST ------- I don't see these issues with B2P so we could probably close this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 hare@novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Comment #21 from hare@novell.com 2006-11-20 03:04 MST ------- Ok, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 j-engel@gmx.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED OS/Version|Other |SuSE Other Priority|P5 - None |P3 - Medium Platform|Other |i686 Resolution|INVALID | Version|Beta 1 |RC 1 Found By|Other |Beta-Customer ------- Comment #22 from j-engel@gmx.de 2006-12-03 10:58 MST ------- I'm sorry, but I have to confirm that bug using 10.2 RC1 and the libata/ata_piix on my laptop (intel 915GM). With a manually compiled 2.6.19 on openSuSE 10.1 everything works fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 markw@alliedtelesis.co.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |markw@alliedtelesis.co.nz ------- Comment #23 from markw@alliedtelesis.co.nz 2006-12-27 12:03 MST ------- I also have had the ata_piix/libata issue on my PC since upgrading to openSUSE 10.2 (I've never had this issue on other linux distros - including a recent FC6 install). The ata_piix/libata issue occurs ~95% of the boot attempts with openSUSE 10.2. 5% of the time it goes through without a hitch. Looking at the dmesg output of the original post, and my setup, there are some differences (eg. the issue is only occuring on my secondary bus, not the primary bus), and some similarities (I alos have an ST3xxx812A drive as the master device, and a PIONEER DVD-RW as the slave device). I tried a manually compiled 2.6.18 and 2.6.19.1 kernels, and I get the same level of success / failure. When I tried a manually compiled 2.6.17.14 kernel, the problem is not observed. I suspect the issue has been introduced with the change to the ATA drivers that took place in 2.6.18 kernel. In any case, I have a solution that works for me - though it's not ideal. I found that either a) removing the PIONEER DVD-RW solved the problem, or b) swapping the order of the ST drive and PIONEER DVD-RW on the bus solved the problem. As this is the secondary bus, I went with option b) - so now my PIONEER DVD-RW is the master device on the bus, and the ST drive is the slave device. With this modified configuration, the boots are nice and fast once more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 hare@novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|hare@novell.com |teheo@novell.com Status|REOPENED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 ------- Comment #24 from teheo@novell.com 2007-02-02 22:12 MST ------- Mark, please test the attached patch against 2.6.20-rc6 and report the result. We had some bugs where ata_piix timing registers are programmed and your problem might be related. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 ------- Comment #25 from teheo@novell.com 2007-02-02 22:15 MST ------- Created an attachment (id=117243) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=117243&action=view) fix-ata_piix-mode-programming -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 teheo@novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |markw@alliedtelesis.co.nz ------- Comment #26 from teheo@novell.com 2007-02-02 22:16 MST ------- Ah.. also please report dmesg of the failing boot. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 markw@alliedtelesis.co.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Info Provider|markw@alliedtelesis.co.nz | ------- Comment #27 from markw@alliedtelesis.co.nz 2007-02-04 20:21 MST ------- Tejun, I went to test the patch you provided, and after I reconfigured my setup back to the failing configuration (which I confirmed with a standard openSUSE 10.2 boot), I could not get the issue to happen with 2.6.20-rc6. I then tested 2.6.19.2 and the problem still happened there as well. I then tested 2.6.20-rc1, only to find that the problem doesn't happen there as well. So it looks like some of the early deliveries in 2.6.20 have addressed the issue, and so I have been unable to test your patch. Does the patch apply to the 2.6.18.2 kernel supplied with openSUSE 10.2? This is the environment where I would really like to get this working. Should I be able to apply your patch to this kernel? Or should I just wait for openSUSE 10.3 which will (I assume) be using a 2.6.20 based kernel? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 teheo@novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |mboman@novell.com ------- Comment #28 from teheo@novell.com 2007-02-04 20:41 MST ------- There is a big gap between 2.6.19.2 and 2.6.20-rc1 and I need the dmesg of the failing boot to pin point your problem. If you can't get a usable system due to the problem, you can boot with the installation media, switch to command console (ctrl-alt-f2). After plugging in a usb disk, type dmesg and you can tell which SCSI device it got assigned from the messages. Mount the device onto /mnt by doing 'mount /dev/sdXN /mnt' and copy the log 'cp /var/log/boot.msg /mnt; dmesg > /mnt/dmesg' and report the result. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 mboman@novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Info Provider|mboman@novell.com | ------- Comment #29 from mboman@novell.com 2007-02-05 03:30 MST ------- Sorry, I don't have this issue any more as I reformatted my partition... You need to get a status report from Mark. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 teheo@novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |markw@alliedtelesis.co.nz ------- Comment #30 from teheo@novell.com 2007-02-05 03:35 MST ------- Sorry, I was intending to set NEEDINFO for Mark. Your problem and Mark's seem different anyway. Mark? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 ------- Comment #31 from markw@alliedtelesis.co.nz 2007-02-05 12:17 MST ------- Created an attachment (id=117445) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=117445&action=view) Working 2.6.20-rc1 dmesg Here is the dmesg from the working 2.6.20-rc1 boot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 ------- Comment #32 from markw@alliedtelesis.co.nz 2007-02-05 12:18 MST ------- Created an attachment (id=117446) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=117446&action=view) Failing 2.6.19.2 dmesg And here is the dmesg from the failing 2.6.19.2 boot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 ------- Comment #33 from teheo@novell.com 2007-02-06 08:33 MST ------- I took a long hard look at the log and diff of relevant files between 2.6.19.2 and 2.6.20-rc1, but really can't tell. There have been a lot of detection fixes for ata_piix between 2.6.19.2 and 2.6.20-rc1, but once detected, things are not very different. Mark, can you be persuaded into bisecting between 2.6.19.2 and 2.6.20-rc1? SL103 will be based on 2.6.20 and thus work but I think this really should be fixed in SL102 especially because this bug affects the most popular controller. For bisecting, you need to use git. For details, please read the following pages. http://linux.yyz.us/git-howto.html http://boinkor.net/archives/2006/11/using_git_bisect_to_locate_bug_1.html http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/howto/isolate-bugs-with-bise... Thanks a lot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 ------- Comment #34 from markw@alliedtelesis.co.nz 2007-02-06 12:51 MST ------- Tejun, I will endevour to start bisecting this issue over the next few nights at home. Give me a few days, and I'll get back to you with my results (We use GIT here at work, and I already have the GIT Linux repo, so this should be resonably straight forward for me). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 ------- Comment #35 from teheo@novell.com 2007-02-06 17:19 MST ------- Thanks. I really appreciate it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 ------- Comment #36 from markw@alliedtelesis.co.nz 2007-02-09 14:00 MST ------- Tejun, I've done the bisecting, and located the commit in the Linux GIT repo (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git) that appears to resolve the issue. This is commit 800b399669ad495ad4361d134df87401ae36f44f, which was delivered by yourself as '[PATCH] libata: always use polling IDENTIFY' (Sun Dec 3 21:34:13 2006 +0900). I've verified this by resetting back to the commit prior to this one (3ac551a6a63dcbc707348772a27bd7090b081524) and verified that the issue is still there (ie the boots process is slow and there are a lot of ATA timeouts). Then when I reset to this commit (800b399669ad495ad4361d134df87401ae36f44f) and build/test the issue is resolved (ie the boot is nice and fast, and there are no ATA timeouts). Now here's the problem.... in looking at the patches that are delivered as part of 2.6.18.2-34-default, it appears that the patch for 800b399669ad495ad4361d134df87401ae36f44f is already included. But it is this build that still has the slow boot time and ATA timeouts. I'm somewhat perplexed about this behaviour. Are there subsequent commits to 800b399669ad495ad4361d134df87401ae36f44f that may have broken, and then re-fixed the issue in a better way? Or was there a subsequent commit that re-fixed the 800b399669ad495ad4361d134df87401ae36f44f solution? I'll wait and take further direction from you if you think there is a more appropriate commit to test. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 ------- Comment #37 from teheo@novell.com 2007-02-10 10:56 MST ------- Yeah, that's the first difference I noticed between the two versions (the detection fix I mentioned above) but I would be really surprised if that causes HSM violation errors for READ commands (what you've reported for 2.6.19.2). Can you post dmesg of 3ac551a6a63dcbc707348772a27bd7090b081524? I think the bisection homed into the detection bug instead of the HSM violation error. Thanks a lot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 markw@alliedtelesis.co.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Info Provider|markw@alliedtelesis.co.nz | ------- Comment #38 from markw@alliedtelesis.co.nz 2007-02-14 00:27 MST ------- Tejun, for some reason I didn't get the EMail notification for the above post. Sorry for the late reply. In any case, I have revisited 800b399669ad495ad4361d134df87401ae36f44f and by some means it looks like I managed to originally generate the diff for this commit the wrong way around - so what looked like you adding ATA_FLAG_DETECT_POLLING, was, when I re-investigated the contents of the patch, you actually *reomving* ATA_FLAG_DETECT_POLLING and the like. When I applied this patch to remove all the ATA POLLING support to the 2.6.18.2-34 kernel, and resolved the resulting conflict, it appears to resolve the issue. ie the boots are fast once more. So in short, commit 800b399669ad495ad4361d134df87401ae36f44f addresses my issue. Can you confirm that 800b399669ad495ad4361d134df87401ae36f44f removed code, and didn't really add code as I first suspected. If 800b399669ad495ad4361d134df87401ae36f44f really does remove the ATA POLLING support, then I think I have located the 'fix' that resolves my issue. Thanks, MarkW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 markw@alliedtelesis.co.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |teheo@novell.com ------- Comment #39 from markw@alliedtelesis.co.nz 2007-02-24 12:56 MST ------- Tejun, Does my previous reply make sense. Sorry for getting the original diff around the wrong way, but I believe my most recent analysis (2007-02-14) is correct. Can you please confirm the resolution. I've been running with a modified openSUSUE 10.2 kernel for the past 10days, and havn't see an issue with this solution yet. Where to from here ? Will this resolution be included in an openSUSE patch? Do you want to close this issue report ? Regards, MarkW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 ------- Comment #40 from teheo@novell.com 2007-02-25 07:45 MST ------- Hello, sorry about late response. I was on the road. I'm confused because the error message you reported for 2.6.19.2 is NOT a detection problem. It's HSM violation and timeouts for DMA READ command which is probably issued by partition code. Prior to 800b399669ad495ad4361d134df87401ae36f44f, polling identify is used if and only if ATA_FLAG_DETECT_POLLING flag is set. After the commit, it's the default behavior for all drivers. ata_piix had the flag set before the commit, so the commit does not introduce any behavior change for ata_piix. To summarize... 1. commit 800b399669ad495ad4361d134df87401ae36f44f only changes device detection and should NOT break or fix HSM violation during DMA READ. 2. commit 800b399669ad495ad4361d134df87401ae36f44f does NOT introduce behavior change for ata_piix. Please... 1. Post the dmesg of opensuse 10.2 without any patch. 2. Post the dmesg of opensuse 10.2 with the patch generated from 800b... 3. Post the patch itself. I think we're confused about something. Let's clear it up. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 markw@alliedtelesis.co.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #117446|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Comment #41 from markw@alliedtelesis.co.nz 2007-02-25 12:04 MST ------- Created an attachment (id=120948) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=120948&action=view) failing dmesg from openSUSE 10.2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 markw@alliedtelesis.co.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #117445|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Comment #42 from markw@alliedtelesis.co.nz 2007-02-25 12:05 MST ------- Created an attachment (id=120949) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=120949&action=view) working dmesg from openSUSE 10.2 with ATA polling as default -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 ------- Comment #43 from markw@alliedtelesis.co.nz 2007-02-25 12:06 MST ------- Created an attachment (id=120950) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=120950&action=view) diff used to specify ATA polling as the default -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 ------- Comment #44 from markw@alliedtelesis.co.nz 2007-02-25 12:09 MST ------- Tejun, I've attached the 3 listings as requested - let me know what you want from here. I agree that my issue appears as a HSM violation, but I thought the HSM violation as occuring duing the detection phase - well before it was attempting to read the partition table. Odd. MarkW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 ------- Comment #45 from teheo@novell.com 2007-02-25 23:51 MST ------- Hmmm... really interesting. Can you please apply the attached patch on top of unmodified 2.6.18.2-34 and see whether the problem is fixed? Thanks for your effort. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 teheo@novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Info Provider|teheo@novell.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 ------- Comment #46 from teheo@novell.com 2007-02-25 23:52 MST ------- Created an attachment (id=120968) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=120968&action=view) polling-revalidate-if-ATA_FLAG_DETECT_POLLING.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 teheo@novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |markw@alliedtelesis.co.nz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 ------- Comment #47 from markw@alliedtelesis.co.nz 2007-02-27 00:47 MST ------- Created an attachment (id=121201) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=121201&action=view) dmesg with Tejun's most recent patch applied Tejun, I've applied the patch you supplied, but the results are still the same - ie the ATA detection is still slow, and as a result the boot times are slow. See the attached dmesg output which is from a clean openSUSE 10.2 (2.6.18.2-34) with your patch applied. MarkW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 teheo@novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #120968|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Comment #48 from teheo@novell.com 2007-02-27 01:34 MST ------- Created an attachment (id=121215) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=121215&action=view) polling-revalidate-if-ATA_FLAG_DETECT_POLLING-take2.patch Sorry, missed one place. This ought fix your problem. :^) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 markw@alliedtelesis.co.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Info Provider|markw@alliedtelesis.co.nz | ------- Comment #49 from markw@alliedtelesis.co.nz 2007-02-27 13:15 MST ------- Tejun, As you expected, this updated patch addresses the issue. With this patch applied, the ATA detection no longer has a problem, and the boot times are nice and quick once more. Thanks, MarkW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216853 teheo@novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Comment #50 from teheo@novell.com 2007-02-27 21:28 MST ------- Thanks, committing the patch to SL102_BRANCH and setting status to resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com