http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613871 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613871#c1 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Hurtado Navarro 2010-06-14 01:23:54 UTC --- I have forgotten to tell you that the Index example was just an example: a ridiculous one, although it does exit. The bigger problem is with cross-references fields... many cross-references fields... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613871 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613871#c3 --- Comment #3 from Rainer Hurtado Navarro 2010-12-22 00:53:51 UTC --- Today, December 21th, 2010, after installing the following packages from OBS: OpenOffice_org-base-extensions-3.2.1.6-1.2.x86_64.rpm OpenOffice_org-impress-3.2.1.6-1.2.x86_64.rpm OpenOffice_org-calc-3.2.1.6-1.2.x86_64.rpm OpenOffice_org-impress-extensions-3.2.1.6-1.2.x86_64.rpm OpenOffice_org-calc-extensions-3.2.1.6-1.2.x86_64.rpm OpenOffice_org-math-3.2.1.6-1.2.x86_64.rpm OpenOffice_org-draw-3.2.1.6-1.2.x86_64.rpm OpenOffice_org-writer-3.2.1.6-1.2.x86_64.rpm OpenOffice_org-draw-extensions-3.2.1.6-1.2.x86_64.rpm OpenOffice_org-writer-extensions-3.2.1.6-1.2.x86_64.rpm OpenOffice_org-l10n-es-3.2.1.6-1.2.noarch.rpm (the new versions available from OBS are just for them) I have noticed that this issue seems corrected. This issue was not corrected in OOo Writer 3.2.1.6-1.1 x86_64, which also, although more stable, seldom crashed (concerning it, the good news was that it recovered the working documents 100%, that it was something that I missed since the OOo versions released with openSuSE 10.2). I do really hope that this gain (F9 fixed) doesn't mean a step-back in the stability of OOo and its recovery capabilities. This issue was very important for me, so I am very very happy. Thank you all, and Merry Christmas! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.