https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679142 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679142#c Duncan Mac-Vicar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dmacvicar@novell.com AssignedTo|zypp-maintainers@forge.prov |mls@novell.com |o.novell.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679142 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679142#c4 Duncan Mac-Vicar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO CC| |mls@novell.com InfoProvider| |mls@novell.com --- Comment #4 from Duncan Mac-Vicar 2011-03-17 12:09:33 UTC --- I tried to get rid of the calculations but they are there to put the stuff related to the transaction, so checking for isToBeInstalled() plus isRecommended() replaces hundred of lines of code with two, but the result is not the same. After talking to Michael Schroeder, we agreed satsolver could store the first transaction (before the weak dependencies) so that we can make a diff between the two. We would then in libzypp always run the solver with recommends, but use the first part only for the --ignore-recommends. And this allow us to set an additional flag in the status to know if the item belongs to the weak part of the transaction or to the strong dependencies one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.