http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100954 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100954#c11 --- Comment #11 from Stanislav Brabec --- Fabian Vogt, comment 10:

kcheckpass uses xdm here, not a special pam module. Is it necessary that lockscreens get detected as such?

If I understand correctly the code, the only purpose of the whole screenlocker code is a restriction of unlock to the token that was used for login. It probably does not apply when the variable is not set or the screensaver pam module name is not listed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.