http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127934
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127934#c15
Johannes Meixner changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(jsmeix@suse.com) |
--- Comment #15 from Johannes Meixner ---
Because there had been several such submitrequests
that got superseded one by one
https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/685058
superseded by
https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/685304
superseded by
https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/685431
superseded by
https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/686126
I had no idea when things will have stabilized so far
to be acceptable.
If
https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/686126
is meant to be usable (for now by users of the Printing project)
I will "just accept" it because in general it looks good to me.
But I cannot review the actual AppArmor related changes
because I know basically nothing about AppArmor.
A side note:
I think Martin Wilck had applied ijs_exec_server_dont_use_sh.patch
only in ghostscript.spec but not in ghostscript-mini.spec
because ghostscript-mini builds with 'configure --without-ijs'
but I like it when patches are applied in any case so that both
ghostscript and ghostscript-mini are built from exactly same sources
and we do not need to care about what patch is actually needed where.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.