http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601243 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601243#c1 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Hurtado Navarro 2010-04-30 07:43:13 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=358042) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=358042) error report file due to a fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment 6.0_17-b17 x86_64 Another report. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601243 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601243#c3 --- Comment #3 from Rainer Hurtado Navarro 2010-04-30 07:46:00 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=358044) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=358044) gdb.log of soffice.bin -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601243 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601243#c5 --- Comment #5 from Rainer Hurtado Navarro 2010-04-30 07:51:49 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=358047) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=358047) screenshot of error message "The process for protocol file unexpectedly finished." -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601243 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601243#c7 --- Comment #7 from Rainer Hurtado Navarro 2010-04-30 07:56:49 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=358050) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=358050) After a crash, OOo states that it will recover the following files... It does not. After a crash, OOo states that it will recover the following files... It does not after the user run it again, but for the "Sin título1.odt", i. e. "No Tile 1.odt" (or "Noname1.odt"). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601243 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601243#c9 Tor Lillqvist changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tlillqvist@novell.com --- Comment #9 from Tor Lillqvist 2010-04-30 09:36:36 UTC --- It is certainly possible that Java is relatd to this crash, but in general, you shouldn't let the "error report file due to a fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment" message mislead you into thinking that Java has caused the crash. Read closely what the message says. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601243 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601243#c11 Lubos Lunak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |llunak@novell.com AssignedTo|llunak@novell.com |bnc-team-ooo@forge.provo.no | |vell.com --- Comment #11 from Lubos Lunak 2010-05-03 12:43:08 UTC --- Sorry, but OOo's crashes are OOo team's responsibility, even if it's in OOo's KDE code. I can hell, but I don't feel responsible. Moreover, while I cannot figure out much from the backtraces from comment #8 the one thing I can see is that KDE code is first encountered only after there's a 'continue' following the first crash. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601243 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601243#c13 --- Comment #13 from Tor Lillqvist 2010-05-05 07:59:22 UTC --- tl, dr -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601243 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601243#c15 --- Comment #15 from Roman Shtylman 2010-05-05 13:38:59 UTC --- I will try to take a look and see if I can reproduce it. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601243 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601243#c17 --- Comment #17 from Rainer Hurtado Navarro 2010-06-06 15:44:18 UTC --- Indeed, Bug 567886 / Bug 558253 seems to be solved with the new release from OBS. However, Bug 571373, on the OOo search dialog the user can't introduce a new work to search or to replace easily, is still present, but not at the same degree of hardening. Also, the Search box still "flicks" when chosen "More Options" before it be expanded stably. On issue referred as Bug 601243, OOo has issues while saving the files, and even crashes, after updating Java Runtime, I can not tell you yet. I have already updated OOo in my laptop (no debuginfo packages here), but I have not upgraded Java there. I am going to updated OOo (plus its debuginfo packages) in my desktop computer, in which I have just upgraded Java (plus its debuginfo packages). It is going to take some time... If I noticed any changes, I will tell you ASAP. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601243 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601243#c19 --- Comment #19 from Rainer Hurtado Navarro 2010-06-12 01:57:49 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=368825) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=368825) strace.log This first strace.log is after opening a previously saved file (OOo Calc's paste linked, submitted for Bug 612265: https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=368824). Perhaps will be interesting the console output, as well: ============== console output begins ============= hurtado@dominatrix:/usr/lib64/ooo3/program> strace -o /tmp/strace.log -f -tt -s 512 ooffice *** buffer overflow detected ***: strace terminated ======= Backtrace: ========= /lib64/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail+0x37)[0x7f1707fba4e7] /lib64/libc.so.6[0x7f1707fb83f0] /lib64/libc.so.6[0x7f1707fb7247] strace[0x4093ac] strace[0x4055b3] strace[0x403d34] strace[0x4049d0] /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xfd)[0x7f1707ef1a7d] strace[0x4020f9] ======= Memory map: ======== 00400000-00447000 r-xp 00000000 08:42 397520 /usr/bin/strace 00647000-00648000 r--p 00047000 08:42 397520 /usr/bin/strace 00648000-00649000 rw-p 00048000 08:42 397520 /usr/bin/strace 00649000-00678000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 [heap] 7f1707cbc000-7f1707cd2000 r-xp 00000000 08:42 1952 /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 7f1707cd2000-7f1707ed1000 ---p 00016000 08:42 1952 /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 7f1707ed1000-7f1707ed2000 r--p 00015000 08:42 1952 /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 7f1707ed2000-7f1707ed3000 rw-p 00016000 08:42 1952 /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 7f1707ed3000-7f1708024000 r-xp 00000000 08:42 119 /lib64/libc-2.10.1.so 7f1708024000-7f1708224000 ---p 00151000 08:42 119 /lib64/libc-2.10.1.so 7f1708224000-7f1708228000 r--p 00151000 08:42 119 /lib64/libc-2.10.1.so 7f1708228000-7f1708229000 rw-p 00155000 08:42 119 /lib64/libc-2.10.1.so 7f1708229000-7f170822e000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 7f170822e000-7f170824c000 r-xp 00000000 08:42 1750 /lib64/ld-2.10.1.so 7f1708420000-7f1708422000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 7f1708448000-7f170844b000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 7f170844b000-7f170844c000 r--p 0001d000 08:42 1750 /lib64/ld-2.10.1.so 7f170844c000-7f170844d000 rw-p 0001e000 08:42 1750 /lib64/ld-2.10.1.so 7fffec37c000-7fffec391000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 [stack] 7fffec3ff000-7fffec400000 r-xp 00000000 00:00 0 [vdso] ffffffffff600000-ffffffffff601000 r-xp 00000000 00:00 0 [vsyscall] Fatal exception: Signal 5 Stack: /usr/lib64/ooo3/program/../basis-link/ure-link/lib/libuno_sal.so.3[0x7fbf3454b60b] /usr/lib64/ooo3/program/../basis-link/ure-link/lib/libuno_sal.so.3[0x7fbf3454b743] /usr/lib64/ooo3/program/../basis-link/ure-link/lib/libuno_sal.so.3[0x7fbf3454b7f7] /lib64/libc.so.6[0x7fbf3380c560] /lib64/libpthread.so.0(pthread_cond_timedwait+0x13d)[0x7fbf3318a2cd] /usr/lib64/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/server/libjvm.so[0x7fbf0962bd26] /usr/lib64/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/server/libjvm.so[0x7fbf0962fe0b] /usr/lib64/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/server/libjvm.so[0x7fbf0971c7a8] /usr/lib64/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/server/libjvm.so[0x7fbf09630192] /lib64/libpthread.so.0[0x7fbf3318565d] /lib64/libc.so.6(clone+0x6d)[0x7fbf338aae1d] Abortado hurtado@dominatrix:/usr/lib64/ooo3/program> ============== console output ends ============= -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601243 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601243#c21 Michal Vyskocil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P5 - None |P4 - Low Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|shtylman@gmail.com |mvyskocil@novell.com Summary|OOo has issues while saving |bas stack protecto patch |the files, and even |causing a crash of OOo |crashes, after updating | |Java Runtime. | --- Comment #21 from Michal Vyskocil 2010-06-14 08:00:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #18)

Rainer, could you please get a strace log? The steps are described at http://en.opensuse.org/Bugs:OOo#How_to_get_strace_log

It might be related to the bug #603316. Unfortunately, the problematic openjdk-6-src-b17-stack-protector.patch was part of the openJDK maintenance update for openSUSE-11.2 :-(

Yes, the strace contains the same problem - opened a lot of /proc/self/maps files without closing. I got this bug. Rainer: please workaround it by removing openjdk and instaling Sun Java, I cannot guarantee this will be fixed soon, because I'd like to merge it with an update of openjdk to newest release. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601243 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601243#c23 --- Comment #23 from Rainer Hurtado Navarro 2010-06-17 00:33:06 UTC --- I am sorry, but I did not understand what do you mean form comment 22. Concerning your comment 21, I downgraded the package, waiting a next update, although I realize that openSuSE 11.2 is cared-less (for instance, there has not been a kernel update in many month, and there is, I have, kernel issues: in a week I have more kernel hangs than all the hangs I ever had in 10 years as a SuSE user, and 11.2 is the first version which worries me due to the lot of times I have lost my data). That is why, in my case, I am very disappointed by 11.2, and, although I do not really know if 11.3 will be so better, I plan to move on as soon 11.3 be released. Thus, it will be what came first: java update or 11.3. Meanwhile, if I might contribute to help you solve any issues, I will do that, because I know that the solution of those issues will benefit what-ever version of SuSE be (I am confident of that). I would downgrade my SuSE to 10.2, which has been, since my humble point of view, the best distribution ever (I have my box, and rsync'ed mirrors the OSS, Non-OSS, Update, Packman, Videolan repositories for it in my HD, and even my first PC, a Compaq Presario 7111LA, improved, still runs it, and I am able to build my own rpms, update from its own pages my preferred applications, &c.), but my new Tablet PC is not supported by 10.2. And downgrading does not help to improve SuSE, nor warranty that in a near future these issues would be solve so I could use a modern SuSE SO that fitted my PC, nor solve my need of a good Tablet support, etc. So, I prefer to bother you with my complaints, help you following your suggestion, and thank you every time, specially when the issues are solved. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601243 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601243#c25 Michal Vyskocil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |623905 --- Comment #25 from Michal Vyskocil 2010-07-30 09:28:05 UTC --- JFI: the new openjdk with fixed stack protector patch is going to maintenance update -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601243 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601243#c26 Michal Vyskocil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #26 from Michal Vyskocil 2010-09-14 13:27:23 UTC --- maintenance update has been released -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.