http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598520 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598520#c2 Reinhard Max changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW InfoProvider|max@novell.com | --- Comment #2 from Reinhard Max 2010-04-22 13:09:13 CEST --- Created an attachment (id=356197) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=356197) /var/log/boot.msg after booting into the Milestone5 install system BTW, hare wondered about the fact that the controller uses PCI INT C rather than A. (In reply to comment #1)

Hmm... 11.2 still works, right?

Yes, even 11.3 Milestone4 still works, but there the output of the driver already looks a bit suspicious: [ 2.738945] ahci 0000:00:1f.2: version 3.0 [ 2.738957] ahci 0000:00:1f.2: PCI INT C -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18 [ 2.738991] alloc irq_desc for 32 on node -1 [ 2.738993] alloc kstat_irqs on node -1 [ 2.739005] ahci 0000:00:1f.2: irq 32 for MSI/MSI-X [ 2.739055] ahci 0000:00:1f.2: AHCI 0001.0200 32 slots 6 ports 3 Gbps 0x27 impl SATA mode [ 2.739057] ahci 0000:00:1f.2: flags: 64bit ncq sntf led clo pio ems sxs [ 2.739060] ahci 0000:00:1f.2: setting latency timer to 64 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598520 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598520#c4 Tejun Heo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO InfoProvider| |max@novell.com --- Comment #4 from Tejun Heo 2010-04-22 11:39:44 UTC --- Hmm... the log from m4 seems fine as far as ahci is concerned and I don't think there has been any relevant ahci changes which could have caused something like this. As for using INT C, that's probably because the pci device hosts several functions and each function is assigned to different INTx. Can you please also attach boot.msg from m4? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598520 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598520#c6 --- Comment #6 from Tejun Heo 2010-04-22 14:29:09 UTC --- I have no idea about the node -1 from irq subsys (it probably indicates that the irq doesn't have preferred NUMA node associated). At any rate, I don't think it's likely to be related with the failure seen on m5. Hmm... there has been a lot of differences in PCI subsystem. I think it's very likely that the problem is coming from PCI. The bridges don't seem to be being set up correctly. <3>pci 0000:00:1f.2: no compatible bridge window for [mem 0xff970000-0xff9707ff] <4>Expanded resource reserved due to conflict with PCI Bus 0000:00 <7>reserve RAM buffer: 000000000009e400 - 000000000009ffff <7>reserve RAM buffer: 00000000cfdffc00 - 00000000cfffffff I think it probably is something which should be forwarded upstream. Who should I be bugging for PCI issues? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598520 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598520#c8 Greg Kroah-Hartman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW CC| |gregkh@novell.com InfoProvider|gregkh@novell.com | --- Comment #8 from Greg Kroah-Hartman 2010-04-22 15:09:48 UTC --- Send the report to the linux-pci@vger.kernel.org mailing list, I'm no longer the upstream PCI maintainer for over a year now. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598520 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598520#c12 --- Comment #12 from Tejun Heo 2010-04-28 14:05:48 UTC --- Hmm... yeah slightly different but looks basically like the same failure. I'll report upstream. Thanks for testing. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598520 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598520#c14 --- Comment #14 from Reinhard Max 2010-05-10 17:04:35 CEST --- The latest kernel from Factory (2.6.34-rc6-7-desktop) seems to include this patch already and initializes the controller just fine when installed into Milestone 4. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598520 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598520#c16 Reinhard Max changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |RESOLVED InfoProvider|max@novell.com | Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #16 from Reinhard Max 2010-06-18 17:42:38 CEST --- Yes, Milestone7 works fine on the Optiplex 960. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.