http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1173005 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1173005#c23 --- Comment #23 from Aaron Puchert <aaronpuchert@alice-dsl.net> --- (In reply to Sergey Kondakov from comment #9)

By the way, Mesa package is currently missing SPIRV-Tools & LLVMSPIRVLib

There is https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/X11:Wayland/spirv-tools, but I'm not sure if that's what you're looking for. There are some home repos with llvm-spirv, and I think it should be fine for Factory. But if nobody submits it, it won't get there. I happen to maintain llvm and would be happy to help, but I have no experience with SPIR-V yet. It seems that we'd need those tools to enable the SPIR-V targets in libclc, so it would definitely be appreciated. (In reply to Sergey Kondakov from comment #11)

I meant to say that I've redirected icd-files for all available OpenCL packages for myself in my repo and, like many others, not going to ever try to push any of my changes or packages into the official distro.

In the long term you'll probably have less work submitting changes than maintaining your own fork, but that's of course up to you.

...

This sounds unrelated. Could you please open a separate Mesa ticket for this, please? You can assign it directly to me.

Sorry but no.

If you can take the time to write about this in a comment to an unrelated bug report, you can also take the time to open a separate bug report.

It would have to be quite a few of them. And if I'm going to do it for every package that I maintain for myself then it would go into tens or hundreds.

Nobody is saying you have to report anything. But if you report issues, open separate bug reports. And even then you don't have to report everything, start with the things that bother you the most.

I still remember "but it's not default build option though and I personally don't care, so why change anything ?" typical SUSE maintainer excuses when I tried to do something which I'm not going to deal with anymore.

We've all had SRs being declined that we didn't agree with. Don't let that stop you, especially since you seem to know a few things that existing maintainers don't know. (In reply to Sergey Kondakov from comment #14)

Yep. I guess things would go better if all maintainers were also heavy users of their stuff.

Certainly right, but how can we get there if heavy users prefer not to contribute or become maintainers? It's not like you're going to become a heavy user just because you inherit a package, and if the actual users don't step up, that situation won't change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.