[Bug 1190566] New: Python 3.6 does not include the compat fixes to work with OpenSSL 3.0.0
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190566 Bug ID: 1190566 Summary: Python 3.6 does not include the compat fixes to work with OpenSSL 3.0.0 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: screening-team-bugs@suse.de Reporter: pmonrealgonzalez@suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs@suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Python 3.10, 3.9 and 3.8 have released the compatibility fixes to build and work with OpenSSL 3.0.0. But python 3.6 does not include these fixes and it seems that upstream is not going to port them to 3.6. Note that many packages fail to build due to this in the staging project where we are testing the OpenSSL 3.0.0 update: * https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/openSUSE:Factory:Staging:Gcc7 I'm not sure about the plans to keep 3.6 in Factory or not. But, if 3.6 is going to stay in Factory for long, it would be convenient to have these fixes also in Factory in that case. Here is the upstream bug for this task with all the required commits: * Make Python compatible with OpenSSL 3.0.0: https://bugs.python.org/issue38820 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190566
Pedro Monreal Gonzalez
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190566
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190566#c1
Pedro Monreal Gonzalez
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190566
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190566#c2
--- Comment #2 from Matej Cepl
I'm not sure about the plans to keep 3.6 in Factory or not. But, if 3.6 is going to stay in Factory for long, it would be convenient to have these fixes also in Factory in that case.
How long is long? We will probably phase out 3.6 after 3.10 is released (and we switch our packages to it), which is planned to be 4.10. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190566
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190566#c3
--- Comment #3 from Pedro Monreal Gonzalez
(In reply to Pedro Monreal Gonzalez from comment #0)
I'm not sure about the plans to keep 3.6 in Factory or not. But, if 3.6 is going to stay in Factory for long, it would be convenient to have these fixes also in Factory in that case.
How long is long? We will probably phase out 3.6 after 3.10 is released (and we switch our packages to it), which is planned to be 4.10.
Two weeks in definitely not long in our time scale, we can wait for that to happen. Our plan is to have openssl-3 ready first in Factory and then submit to SLE-15-SP4. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190566
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190566#c11
--- Comment #11 from Swamp Workflow Management
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190566
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190566#c13
--- Comment #13 from Swamp Workflow Management
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190566
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190566#c14
--- Comment #14 from Swamp Workflow Management
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190566
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190566#c15
--- Comment #15 from Swamp Workflow Management
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190566
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190566#c19
--- Comment #19 from Swamp Workflow Management
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com