https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334250#c1 Danny Kukawka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |bluedzins@wp.pl --- Comment #1 from Danny Kukawka 2007-10-16 07:05:39 MST --- I don't understand why we should rename the CPUFreq names since they are always (in the applet menu, in the config dialog and in the info dialog) in correct combinatio with "CPU Frequency Policy"-naming (as the schemes with "{Current/Active} Scheme"). And they named the same way e.g. in powersave. I see currently no reason to change it. Or is there maybe some wrong translated label in your language? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334250#c3 Danny Kukawka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #3 from Danny Kukawka 2007-10-17 12:08:38 MST --- We discussed this here and decided that there is no need to change the naming, because there is already a strict distinction between schemes and CPU Freq Policies in KPowersave and also powersave. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.