[Bug 1090853] New: duplicate binaries of llvm4 and llvm5
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1090853 Bug ID: 1090853 Summary: duplicate binaries of llvm4 and llvm5 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.0 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: msrb@suse.com Reporter: lnussel@suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs@suse.de CC: dleuenberger@suse.com, dsterba@suse.com, idonmez@suse.com, jslaby@suse.com, martin.liska@suse.com, mlin@suse.com, mpluskal@suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- llvm4 and llvm5 produce binaries with the same name: libc++-devel libc++1 libc++1-debuginfo libc++abi-devel libc++abi1 libc++abi1-debuginfo python3-clang obs cannot handle that properly. Please make sure only one llvm package creates those or include the llvm version in the package name. For now I will disable llvm4 in leap, therefore break klee and creduce. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1090853
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1090853#c1
--- Comment #1 from Ismail Donmez
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1090853
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1090853#c2
--- Comment #2 from Ludwig Nussel
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1090853
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1090853#c3
--- Comment #3 from Michal Srb
Only the latest stable llvm version should provide libc++ & libc++abi packages. Since it's always ABI compatible old clang can use them as well.
That makes sense. (In reply to Ludwig Nussel from comment #2)
so maybe a model similar to gcc is needed where the prjconf defines the default version
We have a meta package "llvm" that depends on the default version. But if we have to conditionally disable the build of some subpackages, then I guess a prjconf define would be the way to get it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1090853
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1090853#c4
--- Comment #4 from Ludwig Nussel
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1090853
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1090853#c5
Michal Srb
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1090853
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1090853#c6
Michal Srb
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com