http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989903 Dr. Werner Fink changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|bnc-team-screening@forge.pr |tchvatal@suse.com |ovo.novell.com | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989903 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989903#c2 Tomáš Chvátal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(werner@suse.com) --- Comment #2 from Tomáš Chvátal --- Actually it is generated right. There seem to be problem with the split between groff and groff-full. The grog binary is in groff while the stuff in %_libdir is in groff-full. What do you think is better, moving grog to the "full" package or move the helper to the base package? What would be your prefference? I suppose this is caused because they seem to rewrite it to use common perl code http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/groff.git/commit/src/roff/grog/grog.pl?id=9... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989903 Dr. Werner Fink changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(werner@suse.com) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989903 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989903#c5 Tomáš Chvátal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Tomáš Chvátal --- Thanks, I updated the package to move things around as described. https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/412541 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.