[Bug 634768] New: ConsoleKit launher for *safe to kde by default
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634768 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634768#c0 Summary: ConsoleKit launher for *safe to kde by default Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.3 Version: Final Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Enhancement Priority: P5 - None Component: KDE4 Workspace AssignedTo: kde-maintainers@suse.de ReportedBy: nettezzaumanaa@gmail.com QAContact: qa@suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100723 SUSE/3.6.8-0.1.1 Firefox/3.6.8 hi there, i'm suggesting to add to kde startup by default this: ck-list-sessions | grep "`tty`" || ck-launch-session ^^ advantages are just clear, although the kdm does a job, there are situations left where the user could start kde with another way (vnc for example) .. this option would save him up to several weeks of investigating, why there doesn't run things like sound or userspace mounter and so .. regards, daniel Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634768
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634768#c1
Christian Trippe
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634768
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634768#c2
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Pecka
Not sure if this is really realistic or if there are other problems when not using KDM or another Login manager.
^^ well, i'm using it in real .. i have custom service in KDE doing so. I've experienced also, that it could be useful in case of factory KDE. I know cases, when due to the custom kde (obs) the CK is not ran after logging in properly. I think that this *generic check and workaround could not harm anything and it's safe to use it. regards, daniel ps. please, reconsider changing the summary back to something accurate. i was not talking about startx and i would never use this summary - i don't understand to your change but i believe that you've got some good reason for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634768
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634768#c3
Christian Trippe
ps. please, reconsider changing the summary back to something accurate. i was not talking about startx and i would never use this summary - i don't understand to your change but i believe that you've got some good reason for it.
Sorry then I probably misunderstood your report. I mainly do some bug screening and will leave this report now to someone more qualified and a better understanding of the matter. Christian Ps: But my guess that this bug/wish is still valid is probably correct, isn't it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634768
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634768#c4
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Pecka
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634768
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634768#c
Daniel Pecka
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634768
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634768#c
Daniel Pecka
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634768
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634768#c5
Hrvoje Senjan
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com