[Bug 974800] New: unable to run go-5 on armv7
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974800 Bug ID: 974800 Summary: unable to run go-5 on armv7 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: armv7 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: bnc-team-screening@forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: dmueller@suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs@suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- running go-5 on tumbleweed/armv7hl gives an endless hang, e.g. as seen on "go-5 version". gdb gives: Program received signal SIGINT, Interrupt. 0xb639b750 in __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt ( mutex=0xb6fff4dc <_rtld_local+1244>, decr=1) at pthread_mutex_unlock.c:73 73 pthread_mutex_unlock.c: No such file or directory. (gdb) p i No symbol "i" in current context. (gdb) bt #0 0xb639b750 in __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt ( mutex=0xb6fff4dc <_rtld_local+1244>, decr=1) at pthread_mutex_unlock.c:73 #1 0xb64cb4ec in __GI___dl_iterate_phdr ( callback=0xb64cb4ec <__GI___dl_iterate_phdr+436>, data=0x10415c54, data@entry=0x10415c4c) at dl-iteratephdr.c:83 #2 0xb64cc3b0 in __gnu_Unwind_Find_exidx (pc=pc@entry=3057612094, pcount=0x10415c74, pcount@entry=0x10415c6c) at ../sysdeps/arm/find_exidx.c:74 #3 0xb637c4f0 in get_eit_entry (ucbp=ucbp@entry=0x10415c88, return_address=3057612094) at ../../../libgcc/unwind-arm-common.inc:210 #4 0xb637cc50 in __gnu_Unwind_Backtrace (trace=0xb6cef380 <unwind>, trace_argument=0x10415f28, entry_vrs=<optimized out>) at ../../../libgcc/unwind-arm-common.inc:567 #5 0xb637d700 in _Unwind_Backtrace () at ../../../libgcc/config/arm/libunwind.S:360 #6 0xb6cef440 in backtrace_full (state=<optimized out>, skip=skip@entry=0, callback=<optimized out>, error_callback=<optimized out>, data=0x10415f54, data@entry=0x10415f4c) at ../../../libbacktrace/backtrace.c:106 #7 0xb69d92d4 in runtime_callers (skip=skip@entry=1, locbuf=locbuf@entry=0x10418074, m=m@entry=32, keep_thunks=keep_thunks@entry=0 '\000') at ../../../libgo/runtime/go-callers.c:168 #8 0xb69e8adc in mcommoninit (mp=mp@entry=0x10418000) ---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---c at ../../../libgo/runtime/proc.c:808 #9 0xb69eb3d4 in runtime_allocm (p=p@entry=0x0, stacksize=stacksize@entry=-1, ret_g0_stack=ret_g0_stack@entry=0x0, ret_g0_stacksize=ret_g0_stacksize@entry=0x0) at ../../../libgo/runtime/proc.c:1146 #10 0xb69eb47c in newm (fn=0xb69ede60 <sysmon>, p=p@entry=0x0) at ../../../libgo/runtime/proc.c:1433 #11 0xb69ed3ec in runtime_main (dummy=<optimized out>) at ../../../libgo/runtime/proc.c:575 #12 0xb69eaf60 in kickoff () at ../../../libgo/runtime/proc.c:235 #13 0xb63f7540 in setcontext () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/setcontext.S:82 Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974800 Dirk Mueller <dmueller@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |agraf@suse.com, | |rguenther@suse.com Assignee|bnc-team-screening@forge.pr |schwab@suse.com |ovo.novell.com | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974800 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974800#c3 Dirk Mueller <dmueller@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(rguenther@suse.co | |m) --- Comment #3 from Dirk Mueller <dmueller@suse.com> --- Can you fix the _constraints so that the gcc6-go has a chance to build? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974800 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974800#c5 Dirk Mueller <dmueller@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(dmueller@suse.com | |) | --- Comment #5 from Dirk Mueller <dmueller@suse.com> --- For gcc5 we're deleting the constraints file as it can never be fulfilled. there is currently no way to create armv7 build workers with more than ~ 1GB of RAM (as the tota l guest including qemu needs to fit into the 32bit 2GB limit on the host). The gcc6 package builds just fine on armv7 without the constraints, as we only build with -j1 or -j2 depending on the worker hardware. just expressing a constraint of 700MB or so for armv7hl should always work (both gcc 5 and gcc 6) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974800 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974800#c6 --- Comment #6 from Dirk Mueller <dmueller@suse.com> --- it hangs also with gcc6-go -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974800 Dirk Mueller <dmueller@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|unable to run go-5 on armv7 |unable to run go-5/go-6 on | |armv7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974800 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974800#c12 Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(schwab@suse.com) | --- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.com> --- No, there are more bugs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974800 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974800#c14 --- Comment #14 from Matwey Kornilov <matwey.kornilov@gmail.com> --- Has anybody tested gcc-7 already? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974800 Dirk Mueller <dmueller@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|dmueller@suse.com |schwab@suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974800 Dirk Mueller <dmueller@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|schwab@suse.com |afaerber@suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974800 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974800#c15 --- Comment #15 from Dirk Mueller <dmueller@suse.com> --- I'm trying with devel:ARM:Factory/go1.9 (gcc7) and it still hangs on initial go bootstrap via gcc-go -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974800 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974800#c17 --- Comment #17 from Matwey Kornilov <matwey.kornilov@gmail.com> --- I cannot reproduce the issue with gcc9 I build gcc version 9.0.0 20181230 (experimental) (GCC) as the following: ../gcc/configure --enable-languages=go --with-arch=armv7-a --with-tune=cortex-a15 --with-float=hard --with-abi=aapcs-linux --with-fpu=vfpv3-d16 --prefix=/opt/gcc/9 Then, build go1.11 as the following: ./make.bash Building Go cmd/dist using /opt/gcc/9. Building Go toolchain1 using /opt/gcc/9. Building Go bootstrap cmd/go (go_bootstrap) using Go toolchain1. Building Go toolchain2 using go_bootstrap and Go toolchain1. Building Go toolchain3 using go_bootstrap and Go toolchain2. Building packages and commands for linux/arm. # os/user cgo-gcc-prolog: In function '_cgo_a84f89c9c806_Cfunc_mygetgrgid_r': cgo-gcc-prolog:59:42: warning: taking address of packed member of 'struct <anonymous>' may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Waddress-of-packed-member] cgo-gcc-prolog:59:78: warning: taking address of packed member of 'struct <anonymous>' may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Waddress-of-packed-member] cgo-gcc-prolog: In function '_cgo_a84f89c9c806_Cfunc_mygetgrnam_r': cgo-gcc-prolog:81:42: warning: taking address of packed member of 'struct <anonymous>' may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Waddress-of-packed-member] cgo-gcc-prolog:81:78: warning: taking address of packed member of 'struct <anonymous>' may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Waddress-of-packed-member] cgo-gcc-prolog: In function '_cgo_a84f89c9c806_Cfunc_mygetpwnam_r': cgo-gcc-prolog:103:42: warning: taking address of packed member of 'struct <anonymous>' may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Waddress-of-packed-member] cgo-gcc-prolog:103:78: warning: taking address of packed member of 'struct <anonymous>' may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Waddress-of-packed-member] cgo-gcc-prolog: In function '_cgo_a84f89c9c806_Cfunc_mygetpwuid_r': cgo-gcc-prolog:125:42: warning: taking address of packed member of 'struct <anonymous>' may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Waddress-of-packed-member] cgo-gcc-prolog:125:78: warning: taking address of packed member of 'struct <anonymous>' may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Waddress-of-packed-member] # os/user cgo-gcc-prolog: In function '_cgo_a84f89c9c806_Cfunc_mygetgrouplist': cgo-gcc-prolog:46:56: warning: taking address of packed member of 'struct <anonymous>' may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Waddress-of-packed-member] cgo-gcc-prolog:46:68: warning: taking address of packed member of 'struct <anonymous>' may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Waddress-of-packed-member] # net cgo-gcc-prolog: In function '_cgo_18049202ccd9_C2func_getnameinfo': cgo-gcc-prolog:51:29: warning: taking address of packed member of 'struct <anonymous>' may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Waddress-of-packed-member] cgo-gcc-prolog: In function '_cgo_18049202ccd9_Cfunc_getnameinfo': cgo-gcc-prolog:77:29: warning: taking address of packed member of 'struct <anonymous>' may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Waddress-of-packed-member] # net cgo-gcc-prolog: In function '_cgo_18049202ccd9_C2func_getaddrinfo': cgo-gcc-prolog:48:53: warning: taking address of packed member of 'struct <anonymous>' may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Waddress-of-packed-member] cgo-gcc-prolog:48:65: warning: taking address of packed member of 'struct <anonymous>' may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Waddress-of-packed-member] cgo-gcc-prolog: In function '_cgo_18049202ccd9_Cfunc_freeaddrinfo': cgo-gcc-prolog:65:21: warning: taking address of packed member of 'struct <anonymous>' may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Waddress-of-packed-member] cgo-gcc-prolog: In function '_cgo_18049202ccd9_Cfunc_getaddrinfo': cgo-gcc-prolog:101:53: warning: taking address of packed member of 'struct <anonymous>' may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Waddress-of-packed-member] cgo-gcc-prolog:101:65: warning: taking address of packed member of 'struct <anonymous>' may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Waddress-of-packed-member] # plugin cgo-gcc-prolog: In function '_cgo_463ee791a5ac_Cfunc_pluginLookup': cgo-gcc-prolog:45:78: warning: taking address of packed member of 'struct <anonymous>' may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Waddress-of-packed-member] cgo-gcc-prolog: In function '_cgo_463ee791a5ac_Cfunc_pluginOpen': cgo-gcc-prolog:64:40: warning: taking address of packed member of 'struct <anonymous>' may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Waddress-of-packed-member] --- Installed Go for linux/arm in /home/matwey/lab/go Installed commands in /home/matwey/lab/go/bin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974800 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974800#c19 --- Comment #19 from Swamp Workflow Management <swamp@suse.de> --- SUSE-SU-2019:1149-1: An update that solves one vulnerability and has two fixes is now available. Category: security (moderate) Bug References: 1121397,1125768,974800 CVE References: CVE-2019-6486 Sources used: SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Open Buildservice Development Tools 15 (src): go1.10-1.10.8-1.8.1 NOTE: This line indicates an update has been released for the listed product(s). At times this might be only a partial fix. If you have questions please reach out to maintenance coordination. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974800 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974800#c22 --- Comment #22 from Swamp Workflow Management <swamp@suse.de> --- SUSE-RU-2020:1341-1: An update that has four recommended fixes can now be installed. Category: recommended (moderate) Bug References: 1082409,1119634,1121397,974800 CVE References: Sources used: SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Open Buildservice Development Tools 15-SP1 (src): go1.9-1.9.7-3.6.2 NOTE: This line indicates an update has been released for the listed product(s). At times this might be only a partial fix. If you have questions please reach out to maintenance coordination. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974800 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974800#c23 --- Comment #23 from Swamp Workflow Management <swamp@suse.de> --- openSUSE-RU-2020:0718-1: An update that has four recommended fixes can now be installed. Category: recommended (moderate) Bug References: 1082409,1119634,1121397,974800 CVE References: Sources used: openSUSE Leap 15.1 (src): go1.9-1.9.7-lp151.2.3.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974800 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974800#c24 --- Comment #24 from Swamp Workflow Management <swamp@suse.de> --- openSUSE-RU-2020:0768-1: An update that has four recommended fixes can now be installed. Category: recommended (moderate) Bug References: 1082409,1119634,1121397,974800 CVE References: Sources used: openSUSE Backports SLE-15-SP1 (src): go1.9-1.9.7-bp151.2.3.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
participants (2)
-
bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com -
bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com