http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1168150 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1168150#c1 Bruno Friedmann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |christophe@krop.fr Component|3rd party software |KDE Applications Version|unspecified |Current Product|openSUSE.org |openSUSE Tumbleweed Target Milestone|--- |Current QA Contact|bnc-team-screening@forge.pr |qa-bugs@suse.de |ovo.novell.com | --- Comment #1 from Bruno Friedmann --- Example of segv appearing now in ufraw gdb /usr/bin/ufraw-batch /usr/share/gdb/python/gdb/command/prompt.py:48: SyntaxWarning: "is not" with a literal. Did you mean "!="? if self.value is not '': /usr/share/gdb/python/gdb/command/prompt.py:60: SyntaxWarning: "is not" with a literal. Did you mean "!="? if self.value is not '': GNU gdb (GDB; openSUSE Tumbleweed) 8.3.1 Copyright (C) 2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "x86_64-suse-linux". Type "show configuration" for configuration details. For bug reporting instructions, please see: http://bugs.opensuse.org/. Find the GDB manual and other documentation resources online at: http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/documentation/. For help, type "help". Type "apropos word" to search for commands related to "word"... Reading symbols from /usr/bin/ufraw-batch... Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/ufraw-batch-0.22-8.4.x86_64.debug... (gdb) run --compression=82 --out-type=jpeg --size=1920 2020-03-20_15-54-22_7v1a2883.cr2 Starting program: /usr/bin/ufraw-batch --compression=82 --out-type=jpeg --size=1920 2020-03-20_15-54-22_7v1a2883.cr2 [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1". Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x00007ffff79a3f58 in lfLens::operator= (this=this@entry=0x5555557ac638, other=...) at /usr/src/debug/lensfun-0.3.95.1584325617.48775126-1.1.x86_64/libs/lensfun/lens.cpp:98 98 /usr/src/debug/lensfun-0.3.95.1584325617.48775126-1.1.x86_64/libs/lensfun/lens.cpp: No such file or directory. Missing separate debuginfos, use: zypper install krb5-debuginfo-1.18-1.1.x86_64 libgcc_s1-debuginfo-10.0.1+git175037-1.2.x86_64 libkeyutils1-debuginfo-1.6-1.4.x86_64 libnss_nis2-debuginfo-3.1-1.2.x86_64 libsasl2-3-debuginfo-2.1.27-3.2.x86_64 (gdb) thread apply all bt Thread 1 (Thread 0x7ffff67b1900 (LWP 10511)): #0 0x00007ffff79a3f58 in lfLens::operator= (this=this@entry=0x5555557ac638, other=...) at /usr/src/debug/lensfun-0.3.95.1584325617.48775126-1.1.x86_64/libs/lensfun/lens.cpp:98 #1 0x0000555555624643 in UFRaw::Lensfun::SetLensInterpolation (this=0x5555557ac600) at ufraw_lensfun.cc:717 #2 0x0000555555624f04 in UFRaw::Lensfun::SetCamera (camera=..., this=0x5555557ac600) at ufraw_lensfun.cc:93 #3 UFRaw::Lensfun::Init (this=0x5555557ac600, reset=<optimized out>) at ufraw_lensfun.cc:781 #4 0x00005555555f085a in UFRaw::ufraw_lensfun_init (reset=1, lensfun=<optimized out>) at ufraw_lensfun.cc:849 #5 ufraw_config (cmd=0x7ffffff67b00, conf=0x7ffffff5cc90, rc=0x7ffffff72970, uf=0x5555557af390) at ufraw_ufraw.c:504 #6 main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at ufraw-batch.c:75 (gdb) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1168150 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1168150#c3 --- Comment #3 from Christophe Giboudeaux --- exherbo, FreeBSD Ports, manjaro.. as well -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1168150 Christophe Giboudeaux changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |IN_PROGRESS -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1168150 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1168150#c7 --- Comment #7 from Bruno Friedmann --- Hi Christophe, I've opened this bug to check what is the best solution for us. As you've already checked other are using 0.3.95 version. Maybe our trouble come to the fact it is a git version including changes others doesn't have. I deeply understand that having a fresh database is certainly expected by most end-user, and this one is still maintained. Perhaps we should try to inject new database, but with stable code. I was checking in graphics and see darktable building there, but I've not yet understood why. Beside that, I'm agree with your feeling about the project, and upstream position. btw I've check fedora and they still use 0.3.2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1168150 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1168150#c8 --- Comment #8 from Christophe Giboudeaux --- Once the revert is in factory, I'll have a look at the data files -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.