http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1045885 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1045885#c2 David Rankin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(drankinatty@sudde | |nlinkmail.com) | --- Comment #2 from David Rankin --- Created attachment 731685 --> http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/attachment.cgi?id=731685&action=edit Geany spec used I built with Gtk+2. The additional files just need packaging when building that way. I have attached the .spec file used (with updates) (I didn't try with Gtk+3, Geany looks horrible with it -- that's why I'm building my own package -- to build with Gtk+2) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1045885 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1045885#c4 --- Comment #4 from David Rankin --- Created attachment 731869 --> http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/attachment.cgi?id=731869&action=edit Geany PLUGINS spec used. Before we close as invalid, let's make sure we understand the problem. I am NOT using a custom .spec from anywhere. This .spec came straight from: geany-plugins-1.30-42.3.src.rpm I did no more than you and changed the flag to build with gtk+2 and got the failure reported here. I think the confusion came from my attaching the WRONG spec. If you would look at the original you would see I attached the Geany .spec by mistake instead of the geany-plugins.spec (yes they are different) sorry. Let's find out what the problem is before closing as Won't Fix at the earliest opportunity. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1045885 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1045885#c6 Atri Bhattacharya changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #6 from Atri Bhattacharya --- (In reply to David Rankin from comment #4)

Created attachment 731869 [details] Geany PLUGINS spec used.

Before we close as invalid, let's make sure we understand the problem. I am NOT using a custom .spec from anywhere. This .spec came straight from:

geany-plugins-1.30-42.3.src.rpm

I did no more than you and changed the flag to build with gtk+2 and got the failure reported here.

Which flag is that? For geany-plugins the specfile from GNOME:Apps does not have a simple flag that you can toggle to switch from gtk3 to gtk2. The "%gtk3_enable" variable at the top is only intended to weed out plugins from the file-list that are still incompatible with gtk3. That's all. There is no intention going forward to support gtk2 builds for geany or geany-plugins at all. So this is still INVALID from the point of view of support. Just to note here that you can, by yourself, modify the spec file for both geany and geany-plugins to build against gtk2 (by modifying the BuildRequires etc). In that case, simply removing the condition checking in the file list "%if %{gtk3_enable}" should be enough to get the package building. But you are pretty much on your own if you go down that route. Sorry!

I think the confusion came from my attaching the WRONG spec. If you would look at the original you would see I attached the Geany .spec by mistake instead of the geany-plugins.spec (yes they are different) sorry.

Let's find out what the problem is before closing as Won't Fix at the earliest opportunity. Thanks.

Hope that clears up why this bug is invalid. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.