[Bug 467174] New: automounting is killing the dvd drives with udf disc
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 Summary: automounting is killing the dvd drives with udf disc Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.1 Version: Final Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening@forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: bluedzins@wp.pl QAContact: qa@suse.de Found By: --- automounting is killing the dvd drives with udf disc I just upgraded from OS 10.3 and to my surprise I was barely able to read all my disk, which mostly have been written using udf. After two days of digging, I found out the culprit -- automounting. Previously I had an entry for dvd drive, with iso9660 (it works for udf perfectly), now everything is automounted and with udf disc is it an ordeal -- each disc takes 3 minutes and 30 secons to mount (!) after noisy fight, a lot of work of drive. I am pretty convinced this is not healthy for the drive. mount -t auto /dev/sr0 /media/dvd --> 3.30 min + noise + drive struggle mount -t iso9660 /dev/sr0 /media/dvd or mount -t udf /dev/sr0 /media/dvd --> instantaneous mounting, silent operation My naive suggestion would be to change the auto behaviour -- try iso9660 first for the disc drives, after all it is most likely to work right away. If not, keep trying other formats. But this is just a suggestion from the user -- bottom line is please change the automounting behaviour because it can lead to breaking the drive (after some time), it locks the drive for over 3 minutes and it could be a big "surprise" for opensuse users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User bluedzins@wp.pl added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c1 Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|automounting is killing the |mounting udf disc as udf is |dvd drives with udf disc |killing the dvd drive --- Comment #1 from Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> 2009-01-17 16:06:09 MST --- After some more testing more details, those discs (udf) were burnt on 32-bit system using opensuse 10.3. ISO9660 (mount) * mount -t iso9660 works silently on 64-bit system with opensuse 11.1, but the data are unreadable * mount -t iso9660 on 32-bit system was not tested UDF (mount) * mount -t udf works fine on 32-bit system with opensuse 10.3 * mount -t udf on 32-bit + OS 11.1 leads to a complete struggle with the drive while mounting, but later reading is OK. * mount -t udf on 64-bit + OS 11.1 leads to a complete struggle with the drive while mounting, but later reading is OK. So sorry for the previous report, it was misleading.
From those tests it seams that the fault is _not_ with AUTOmounting but with mounting system itself in opensuse 11.1.
-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User bluedzins@wp.pl added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c2 --- Comment #2 from Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> 2009-01-17 16:10:00 MST --- PS. On 32-bit system, opensuse 10.3, automounting was the struggle though for the drive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User bluedzins@wp.pl added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c3 Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|mounting udf disc as udf is |mounting udf disc as udf is |killing the dvd drive |killing HL dvd drives Severity|Major |Critical --- Comment #3 from Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> 2009-01-18 01:33:59 MST --- And more tests: * 64 bit computer, 32-bit opensuse 10.3, mount -t udf -- silent, immediate, mount -t auto -- noisy, takes time All the above test were done on two computers (Dell), each with HL-DL-ST dvd drive (not the same of course). I attached external dvd drive -- NEC, and results are surprising -- 64-bit computer, 32-bit opensuse 10.3 and 64-bit opensuse 11.1, mount -t udf and mount -t auto -- silent, immediate operation. So, opensuse didn't like udf disc in HL drive already at times of 10.3, but now things get even worser. Maybe another case of "LG loves Mandrake" (LH = LG + Hitachi). Judging from all the noise OS+LH makes, the rapid movement of the head it is probably advised not to use udf disc in such drives and use external drives, non-LH (if user has such drive). So, there are two issues now: * please make 11.1 perform mount -t udf as 10.3 did -- it is possible for sure * please make opensuse perform mount on LH drives in more gentle way -- it might be not possible, though -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 Andreas Jaeger <aj@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bnc-team-screening@forge.pr |kernel-maintainers@forge.pr |ovo.novell.com |ovo.novell.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User gregkh@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c4 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|kernel-maintainers@forge.pr |bnc-team-screening@forge.pr |ovo.novell.com |ovo.novell.com --- Comment #4 from Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@novell.com> 2009-01-25 17:59:44 MST --- This is a hal mount issue, not a kernel one... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 Pavol Rusnak <prusnak@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bnc-team-screening@forge.pr |dkukawka@novell.com |ovo.novell.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User dkukawka@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c5 Danny Kukawka <dkukawka@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |bluedzins@wp.pl --- Comment #5 from Danny Kukawka <dkukawka@novell.com> 2009-02-23 00:49:25 MST --- Please provide full output of lshal with the media in the device. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User dkukawka@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c6 --- Comment #6 from Danny Kukawka <dkukawka@novell.com> 2009-02-23 00:50:28 MST --- And please also the output of '/lib/udev/vol_id /dev/sr0' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User bluedzins@wp.pl added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c7 --- Comment #7 from Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> 2009-02-23 07:46:58 MST --- /lib/udev/vol_id /dev/sr0 ID_FS_USAGE=filesystem ID_FS_TYPE=udf ID_FS_VERSION= ID_FS_UUID= ID_FS_UUID_ENC= ID_FS_LABEL=db ID_FS_LABEL_ENC=db ID_FS_LABEL_SAFE=db -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User bluedzins@wp.pl added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c8 Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Info Provider|bluedzins@wp.pl | --- Comment #8 from Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> 2009-02-23 07:48:17 MST --- Created an attachment (id=274673) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=274673) lshal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User dkukawka@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c9 Danny Kukawka <dkukawka@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |bluedzins@wp.pl --- Comment #9 from Danny Kukawka <dkukawka@novell.com> 2009-02-23 08:11:42 MST --- I'm confused: Do we speak about mounting the DVD via GNOME/KDE or do we speak about some kind of other automount?
From the HAL side everything is correctly. The filesystem get correctly detected and the desktop should mount it that way via HAL dbus functions.
-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User bluedzins@wp.pl added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c10 Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Info Provider|bluedzins@wp.pl | --- Comment #10 from Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> 2009-02-23 15:23:30 MST --- Danny, I initially thought the problem is with automounting but the problem is with mounting.
The filesystem get correctly detected
OK, but the problem is the detection is silent and correct (as you said), but the mounting takes absurdly long time, meanwhile the drive is dying (with disc too), the mounting is extremely noisy. In short -- it looks like system is fighting with the drive and I am afraid that if I keep using it it will soon fail for me. So if there was some information about disc detected, mount does not know about it and tries hard to detect (?) the disc or mount (?) it. The problem is with mount command (and any related mechanism -- like automounting). As I showed in tests, no such issue with opensuse 10.3. So something had changed in a bad direction. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User dkukawka@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c11 Danny Kukawka <dkukawka@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dkukawka@novell.com AssignedTo|dkukawka@novell.com |bnc-team-screening@forge.pr | |ovo.novell.com --- Comment #11 from Danny Kukawka <dkukawka@novell.com> 2009-02-27 09:39:15 MST --- Then it looks like a problem in the base system/kernel but not in HAL itself. Reassign to default owner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User chrubis@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c12 Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |bluedzins@wp.pl --- Comment #12 from Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@novell.com> 2009-03-02 05:14:08 MST --- Please attach output from "dmesg" after mounting medium. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User bluedzins@wp.pl added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c13 Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Info Provider|bluedzins@wp.pl | --- Comment #13 from Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> 2009-03-02 09:07:24 MST --- Created an attachment (id=276443) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=276443) dmesg Here we go... I just want to assure you the error msg you see in the log is not because this single disc has errors -- I have a lot of udf discs and this problem occurs for all of them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bnc-team-screening@forge.pr |kernel-maintainers@forge.pr |ovo.novell.com |ovo.novell.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|kernel-maintainers@forge.pr |teheo@novell.com |ovo.novell.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User teheo@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c14 Tejun Heo <teheo@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |bluedzins@wp.pl --- Comment #14 from Tejun Heo <teheo@novell.com> 2009-03-02 17:12:43 MST --- Can you please attach /var/log/boot.msg and the full output of dmesg after several of those attempts? In general, it definitely looks like degrading media and/or drive problem. The drive simply can't read data off the media. From the posted log, what catches my eyes is that the errors are near the end of the media (> 4GB) and what could have changed between 10.3 and 11.0 is the access pattern for mounting. 11.0 could be trying to read data near the end of the media, which is legit but would cause problem if the media is degrading on the area or the drive is failing. The differenc between -t autofs and -t udf on 10.3 fits the theory nicely too. Also, on 10.3, can you please try to access the whole media? i.e. "dd if=/dev/sr0 of=/dev/null bs=1M" and see whether any of the frantic drive behavior happens? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User bluedzins@wp.pl added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c15 --- Comment #15 from Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> 2009-03-03 07:26:23 MST --- Logs follow. Strange result so far: * every disc burnt in 10.3 (k3b) has hard time mounting * some discs burnt in 11.1 (brasero) are mount fine, some not (i.e. as above) I will restart using 10.3 and add news about dd. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User bluedzins@wp.pl added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c16 --- Comment #16 from Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> 2009-03-03 07:29:02 MST --- Created an attachment (id=276725) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=276725) boot.msg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User bluedzins@wp.pl added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c17 --- Comment #17 from Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> 2009-03-03 07:32:38 MST --- Created an attachment (id=276726) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=276726) dmesg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User bluedzins@wp.pl added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c18 Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Info Provider|bluedzins@wp.pl | --- Comment #18 from Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> 2009-03-03 08:00:05 MST --- Test with 10.3 and dd -- for very long time normal whoosh sound from the disc, at the end the same struggle sound I have with 11.1 and suddenly the end and the message of input/output error + statistics of reading. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User teheo@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c19 Tejun Heo <teheo@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #19 from Tejun Heo <teheo@novell.com> 2009-03-03 18:15:46 MST --- Have no idea what's up with the k3b/brasero difference but dd causing same IO errors on 10.3 strongly indicates something is wrong with the drive or media. ISTR there are cases where medium error was caused when the burning was done with incorrect parameters (it was padding related, I don't remember exactly). In those cases, the IO errors were localized to the last few sectors. Can't tell whether this is your case tho. I can tell you that brasero doesn't make such mistakes when burning regular iso images but I don't have much experience with udf. At any rate, this doesn't seem to be a driver related problem. For whatever reason, the drive can't read certain sectors off the media so the struggle and errors. As it's more likely to be a hardware / media problem, I'm afraid the only way to debug the problem is to eliminate causes one by one. ie. Try different recorder (this would be my first bet), try different readers, try different media and so on. I'm resolving as INVALID for now. Please feel free to reopen if there's anything indicating software problem. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User bluedzins@wp.pl added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c20 --- Comment #20 from Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> 2009-03-04 01:41:54 MST --- Look, I have hard evidence it is OS 11.1 problem -- it is not about just one computer, it is not just about one HL drive, it is not about just one disc. The discs are already there (Sony, Verbatim, TDK, Omega), they are burnt and I would like to use them -- pretty sane I think. I won't trash them just because I upgraded OS.
try different readers, try different media and so on.
Please, read the report from the beginning -- I did enough tests already and the data are already there. The problem is with OS 11.1 + HL drives + UDF discs _only_. Nothing less, nothing more. Bottom line is this -- opensuse 10.3 did what everybody could expect -- mounting flawlessly *anything*, *anywhere*. This is the fact. Opensuse 11.1 mount cannot match 10.3 counterpart (the proof is above). And the issue is to provide the same quality in 11.1 as were in 10.3 -- quite simply. Solving the problem is possible because it was already done. In OS 10.3. If 10.3 could do this, OS 11.1 can do it to -- closing the reports about quality regression is not part of solving it (btw. closing this reports simply means admitting OS 11.1 does not support HL drives anymore, only NEC, and maybe others). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User bluedzins@wp.pl added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c21 Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | --- Comment #21 from Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> 2009-03-04 01:44:34 MST --- Changing status accordingly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User teheo@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c22 Tejun Heo <teheo@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |bluedzins@wp.pl --- Comment #22 from Tejun Heo <teheo@novell.com> 2009-03-04 02:15:30 MST --- You're experiencing media error w/ dd on openSUSE 11.0 too. Probably the only difference between SL110 and SL111 is that something on SL111 is trying to access sectors near the end of the media during mount. The -t auto triggering the problem is indicative of this too. The bottom line is that some sectors on those media are inaccessible and whether SL111 triggers it or not isn't very relevant as long as what SL111 does is legit (ie. drive struggling for inaccessible media isn't a bug). If most of the media you have are showing the same problem (note that the problem did exist on SL103, it just wasn't visible because nobody was reading the affected area), it's more likely that the burning process is somehow botched but then again this doesn't really explain why the NEC one is happy with those media. The closest thing I can think of other than hardware problem is the padding problem I mentioned earlier and it could be that NEC firmware handles it differently. Can you please do the followings? 1. Select a few different media burned at different times. 2. Record "cat /sys/block/sr0/size" for each media on SL103 and SL110. It would be better to turn off automount on SL110. 3. do "dd if=/dev/sr0 of=/dev/null bs=2048 iflags=direct" and record the kernel error messages for IO errors. You can play with skip= parameter if you wanna skip over the earlier part of the media. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User teheo@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c23 Tejun Heo <teheo@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jack@novell.com --- Comment #23 from Tejun Heo <teheo@novell.com> 2009-03-04 02:20:19 MST --- cc'ing Jan Kara. Hello, Jan. Has udf behavior changed during mount between SL103 and SL111? It seems that during mount SL111 is trying to access sectors near the end of the media while SL103 didn't. I'm not sure where the access is coming from but if mount -t udf is showing different behaviors, it's likely to be something inside the udf code, right? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User teheo@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c24 --- Comment #24 from Tejun Heo <teheo@novell.com> 2009-03-04 02:34:17 MST --- Eh... I screwed up release numbers. (In reply to comment #22)
You're experiencing media error w/ dd on openSUSE 11.0 too. Probably the only difference between SL110 and SL111 is that something on SL111 is trying to SL103 and SL111 .. 1. Select a few different media burned at different times. 2. Record "cat /sys/block/sr0/size" for each media on SL103 and SL110. It SL111 would be better to turn off automount on SL110. SL111
-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User bluedzins@wp.pl added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c25 --- Comment #25 from Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> 2009-03-04 02:55:13 MST --- Tejun, ad.b) using which opensuse (btw. I don't have suselinux I use open version, opensuse)? How do I record those kernel errors? From /var/log/messages? Since reading the whole dvd disc is lengthy operation what safe value for skip do you suggest? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User bluedzins@wp.pl added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c26 Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |REOPENED Info Provider|bluedzins@wp.pl | --- Comment #26 from Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> 2009-03-04 03:17:10 MST --- a) OS11.1: 8357568 9180416 8922304 9180416 9180416 9180416 the last 2 ones were burnt at the same day if I remember correctly. For the rest difference in time is months and years. The same set in the same order, OS10.3 -- the numbers are identical to those above. So, please let know about the (b) part. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User bluedzins@wp.pl added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c27 --- Comment #27 from Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> 2009-03-04 03:19:46 MST --- ad.a) some of them were burnt using even OS10.2, but I had no problem with mounting after upgrade 10.2->10.3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User teheo@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c28 Tejun Heo <teheo@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |bluedzins@wp.pl --- Comment #28 from Tejun Heo <teheo@novell.com> 2009-03-04 03:24:27 MST --- Heh... Sorry about the cryptic release names. SL103 == openSUSE 10.3. SL111 == openSUSE 11.1. It's something used internally that I got too used to. skip=N will skip N megabytes. If the reported size is 8357568, it's 4080Mbytes (8357568*512/1024/1024), so skip=4000 should do the trick. Similarly for others, reading several tens of megabytes at the end should do the trick. Running "dmesg" will show the kernel messages. You can run "dmesg -c" to clear whatever has accumulated for the next run. Yeah, the behavior seems to have changed between SL103 and SL111. What did you use to burn the media? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User jack@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c29 --- Comment #29 from Jan Kara <jack@novell.com> 2009-03-04 03:30:48 MST --- UDF has something which is called "anchor block". Essentially it plays role of superblock. The problem with this block is that it can be on several places in the media and it depends on the creator of the media which position he chooses. Furthermore some of these positions are relative to the end of the media (recorded area) and some drives misreport size of this area. OpenSuse 11.1 is different from OpenSUSE10.3 in the fact that it checks some more placements of anchor block (previously we were missing some places required by the standard) and we check even some more to compensate for drives reporting recorded area wrongly. I guess some of these places are what makes problem to your media. I'll attach here a debug patch that will report which blocks we are trying (and what recorded size the drive reports). Please try a kernel with this patch applied and send me the resulting kernel messages. I'll have a look whether we can somehow reasonably workaround problems your drive has. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User jack@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c30 --- Comment #30 from Jan Kara <jack@novell.com> 2009-03-04 03:32:34 MST --- Created an attachment (id=276988) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=276988) Debugging patch to report anchor block numbers Please try this debugging patch. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User bluedzins@wp.pl added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c31 --- Comment #31 from Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> 2009-03-04 06:27:11 MST --- Since it is not trivial I want to reassure. I have to download kernel-source, apply patch, compile kernel, add it as secondary kernel, add entry in grub, boot system with this new kernel selected and check how the drive behaves? Is this correct. Should I do the tests (b) anyway? About the mount algorithm -- would be it be possible to provide lazy algorithm, i.e. look for anchor block until they are all collected, so it would be possible to omit some places, if they are found before it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User teheo@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c32 --- Comment #32 from Tejun Heo <teheo@novell.com> 2009-03-04 06:30:07 MST --- I can prepare a debug kernel package for you. It will take about an hour or so. Please stand by. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User jack@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c33 --- Comment #33 from Jan Kara <jack@novell.com> 2009-03-04 06:38:10 MST --- Thanks Tejun. Maciej: About b) yes, it would be good to know /sys/block/sr0/size from 10.3 and 11.1 at least for one failing media. About the algorithm: We already do what you suggest - i.e. check one possible position after another until we find a correct one. But obviously we try some position not working with your drive before we find the correct one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User teheo@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c34 --- Comment #34 from Tejun Heo <teheo@novell.com> 2009-03-04 06:39:46 MST --- Yeah, and please do the dd testing. I wanna see whether the read failure is localized to the last few sectors . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User bluedzins@wp.pl added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c35 --- Comment #35 from Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> 2009-03-04 06:56:30 MST --- Tejun thank you in advance, I compiled kernel myself years ago :-) So, I have to run the following tests: * new kernel -- a, b * current kernel -- b * os 10.3 -- b ? Jan, for the two last ones I already run (a), see #26. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User bluedzins@wp.pl added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c36 --- Comment #36 from Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> 2009-03-04 13:57:34 MST --- Created an attachment (id=277162) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=277162) dmesg 11.1 dd if=/dev/sr0 of=/dev/null bs=2048 iflag=direct skip=2080000 because skip skips bs*skip bytes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User jack@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c37 --- Comment #37 from Jan Kara <jack@novell.com> 2009-03-04 15:09:54 MST --- Maciej, the logfile you've attached does not seem to contain the kernel messages from UDF. Are you sure you've run the kernel with the patch? Also you can check whether the messages weren't just filtered by syslog. Anyway, dmesg should show the messages in any case so you can have a look at its output. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User teheo@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c38 --- Comment #38 from Tejun Heo <teheo@novell.com> 2009-03-04 18:28:02 MST --- Here's the debug kernel. Sorry about the delay. I fell asleep. http://htj.dyndns.org/export/testing/sl111-x86_64-bnc467174_dbg0/ Jan, the posted kernel log is to determine where the IO errors are. It's dd'ing from the end of the media to see where it falls apart. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User teheo@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c39 --- Comment #39 from Tejun Heo <teheo@novell.com> 2009-03-04 18:36:05 MST --- (In reply to comment #36)
Created an attachment (id=277162) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=277162) [details] dmesg 11.1
dd if=/dev/sr0 of=/dev/null bs=2048 iflag=direct skip=2080000 because skip skips bs*skip bytes
Ah.. right, I had bs=1M at first. Can you please turn off firewall logging? The log is difficult to follow with all the firewall messages. The failed sector is 9176768. dd reported the same (in 2048 sector unit tho), right? What's the actual size of the test media? It doesn't fall into last sectors of any of the posted sizes. Can you please test several other media? If the failure isn't localized to the last few sectors, it's more likely to be actual media issue. Can you please verify the media is fully readable in 10.3? ie. Does "tar cvf - /CD-MOUNT-POINT > /dev/null" finish without triggering IO errors? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User bluedzins@wp.pl added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c40 --- Comment #40 from Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> 2009-03-05 01:43:18 MST --- Created an attachment (id=277253) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=277253) dmesg 10.3 This time I increased the skip a little dd if=/dev/sr0 of=/dev/null bs=2048 iflag=direct skip=2088000 Answering all questions so far :-) * I used k3b in OS 10.2 and 10.3, I cannot burn any DVD disc (CD is ok) anymore in 11.1 using K3b so I use brasero * Jan, the previous dmesg 11.1 was from unaltered kernel * the test-set is the same from the sector size, the order of the discs I test is also the same (so as you can see there are already several discs) * tar cvf - /CD-MOUNT-POINT > /dev/null this works fine, but I doubt it tests anything, because the content of the disc is about ~4GB, and tar finished its job in less than second (in other words there was no reading content of the disc), it looked for me it was only archived the list of the filenames Next test --> OS 11.1 with patched kernel (thank you very much Tejun) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User bluedzins@wp.pl added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c41 --- Comment #41 from Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> 2009-03-05 01:48:27 MST --- Tejun, sorry for disturbing you but which file should I download and install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User teheo@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c42 --- Comment #42 from Tejun Heo <teheo@novell.com> 2009-03-05 01:56:09 MST --- Download the following three files. kernel-default-base-2.6.27.18-*.x86_64.rpm kernel-default-2.6.27.18-*.x86_64.rpm kernel-default-extra-2.6.27.18-*.x86_64.rpm and do "rpm -Uvh --force ALL_THREE_RPMS". Eh.. you didn't answer one question, what's the original size of the test media? And I don't know why the tar didn't to do it but can you please try to verify whether all contents of the media is accessible after testing the debug kernel? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User bluedzins@wp.pl added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c43 --- Comment #43 from Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> 2009-03-05 03:29:28 MST --- Ok, I move the current kernel aside not to be overwritten, right? The media size, you mean the disc? It is standard DVD single layer, so it is 4.4 (fake) GB. The content is one or two files, one 4GB-4.4GB, the second if exists is checksum of the first one. If it is sufficient I can tell the files are 100% readable and correct, because MD5 checksums match. This is tested under 10.3 and 11.1. But this is test of the file, not the entire disk. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User bluedzins@wp.pl added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c44 --- Comment #44 from Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> 2009-03-05 14:50:37 MST --- Created an attachment (id=277491) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=277491) kernel.txt I am sorry but I didn't do the test so far. The problem is I have to have this machine working. I installed the kernel as described, and get huge list of warnings and fatal errors. I checked the /boot after that and my current kernel was deleted. So I was at the point that I could boot computer or... scary to think for me. So I installed back the standard kernel. I would have to find the way how to install this special kernel additionally, so if it won't boot I could select my standard kernel in grub. See the messages from installation in the attachment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User teheo@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c45 --- Comment #45 from Tejun Heo <teheo@novell.com> 2009-03-05 18:58:36 MST --- Hmmm... Nothing looks too wrong to me. The initrd for the debug kernel was generated alright. Dunno why the original modules are remaining while the kernel is gone tho. Anyways, it should bood fine with the debug kernel. It would be nice to install the kernel in parallel tho. Just keep an installation/rescue media around and give it a try. Also, I meant "cat /sys/block/sr0/size" by media size. Good luck. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User bluedzins@wp.pl added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c46 Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |REOPENED Info Provider|bluedzins@wp.pl | --- Comment #46 from Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> 2009-03-14 09:39:37 MST --- Created an attachment (id=279619) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=279619) dmesg patched 11.1 Sorry for the delay but I have to gain some courage ;-) The media sizes are exactly the same as I already reported. The dmesg log is attached here. The discs-set is also the same and the order of checking the discs is also the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User teheo@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c47 Tejun Heo <teheo@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |bluedzins@wp.pl --- Comment #47 from Tejun Heo <teheo@novell.com> 2009-03-15 20:11:04 MST --- Maciej, thanks for testing. Can you please post /var/log/boot.msg too? It doesn't seem to contain the debug messages Jan's patch added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User bluedzins@wp.pl added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c48 Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |REOPENED Info Provider|bluedzins@wp.pl | --- Comment #48 from Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> 2009-03-16 12:16:57 MST --- Created an attachment (id=279843) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=279843) boot.msg patched 11.1 Here we go... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User jack@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c49 Jan Kara <jack@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |bluedzins@wp.pl --- Comment #49 from Jan Kara <jack@novell.com> 2009-03-16 13:49:44 MST --- Maciej, have you really tried mounting the problematic disc? I don't think so because there should be at least a message like: UDF-fs INFO UDF: Mounting volume 'udf26', timestamp 2008/04/10 18:56 (103c) in the kernel log and additionally also some debug messages. So please try mounting the problematic disc under the debug kernel and then post the dmesg output. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User bluedzins@wp.pl added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c50 Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |REOPENED Info Provider|bluedzins@wp.pl | --- Comment #50 from Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> 2009-03-16 14:31:06 MST --- Jan, what I did: a) rpm -Uvh --force *.rpm in the directory with kernel files (tag: bnc) b) reboot c) dmesg -c > /dev/null d) insert one disk, check the media size, and run dd (test a and b, see #22) e) the same as (d) for all discs in the test set f) dmesg > /tmp/dmesg.txt g) go to dir with "normal" kernel h) rpm -Uvh --force *.rpm i) reboot j) send you the /tmp/dmesg.txt That's it. So if there is something else needed please tell me what kind of test I should perform. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User jack@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c51 --- Comment #51 from Jan Kara <jack@novell.com> 2009-03-16 15:11:23 MST --- Aha, OK. So I'd need the following: Instead of d) and e), take just one disk which has problems and mount it and then umount it. Other steps can remain the same. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User bluedzins@wp.pl added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c52 --- Comment #52 from Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> 2009-03-17 16:52:32 MST --- Created an attachment (id=280159) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=280159) dmesg patched 11.1 -- mount -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User jack@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c53 Jan Kara <jack@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|teheo@novell.com |jack@novell.com --- Comment #53 from Jan Kara <jack@novell.com> 2009-03-18 04:45:14 MST --- Thanks for the dump. It contains all the info I need. What happens is that your drive reports that the last recorded block on the media is 2295103 (in 2048 bytes sized blocks) but apparently it's not able to read anywhere nearby before it. Finally we find the anchor block in block 256 (either the media is open or it is not standard compliant) but we check all the blocks near the end of the media earlier and that's causing troubles to your drive. I've checked the UDF standard and it seems we are allowed to try block 256 first and use it if it's OK but it needs larger code modification because currently we first check which of the all allowed blocks look reasonable and only after that fully verify which blocks are completely fine. So even if I put block 256 in front of the sequence we'd try reading blocks near the end of the media anyway. So stay tuned. Tejun, I'm taking the bug since this really seems like UDF which is making difference. Thanks for help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User jack@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c54 Jan Kara <jack@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P5 - None |P3 - Medium Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |bluedzins@wp.pl --- Comment #54 from Jan Kara <jack@novell.com> 2009-03-19 10:56:51 MST --- Ok, I've rewritten the anchor detection code. The test kernel will be soon mirrored to http://beta.suse.com/private/jack/467174/. Could you please test whether your media now mount without problems? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User bluedzins@wp.pl added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c55 Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Info Provider|bluedzins@wp.pl | --- Comment #55 from Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins@wp.pl> 2009-03-19 15:01:24 MST --- Jan, thank you! Mounting now is fast and quiet. I tested both HL drive and NEC drive and just for be sure some udf disc which didn't make any problems before. All tests passed flawlessly. So, thank you once again. The obvious question is -- can I keep this kernel installed, or there is some performance issue with it (like increased debug output or something)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User jack@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c56 --- Comment #56 from Jan Kara <jack@novell.com> 2009-03-23 07:19:25 MST --- The kernel should be fine. You can keep it installed and use it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174 User jack@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467174#c57 Jan Kara <jack@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #57 from Jan Kara <jack@novell.com> 2009-03-23 07:33:44 MST --- OK, I've committed the fix to the kernel repository so the fix should be in the next maintenance update. Closing the bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com