[Bug 1121412] New: should disable to building kubic multibuilded subpackage on Leap
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412 Bug ID: 1121412 Summary: should disable to building kubic multibuilded subpackage on Leap Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.1 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Containers Assignee: containers-bugowner@suse.de Reporter: mlin@suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs@suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Most of container packages had multibuilded "kubic" subpackage, eg. containerd, docker, docker-runc, etc., however we don't have kubernetes in Leap this causes failed installcheck, eg. nothing provides kubernetes-kubeadm needed by docker-kubic-kubeadm-criconfig Therefore the container stack package updates can not pass Leap staging testing. Maybe we should disable kubic flavor building on Leap? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412#c1
Jordi Massaguer
Most of container packages had multibuilded "kubic" subpackage, eg. containerd, docker, docker-runc, etc., however we don't have kubernetes in Leap this causes failed installcheck, eg.
nothing provides kubernetes-kubeadm needed by docker-kubic-kubeadm-criconfig
Therefore the container stack package updates can not pass Leap staging testing. Maybe we should disable kubic flavor building on Leap?
I am not familiar with _multibuild . Is there an easy way to do that? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412#c2
--- Comment #2 from Max Lin
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412#c3
--- Comment #3 from Flavio Castelli
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412#c4
--- Comment #4 from Max Lin
We think it would be easier to just disable the kubic flavor when building these packages for Leap.
Unfortunately there are still some differences between the "plain" docker packages and the one built for kubic (and hence used by SUSE CaaS Platform).
You mean changing repository build setting to off on kubic flavor? No, it must to be done in packaging level ie. specfile. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412
Ludwig Nussel
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412#c5
Flavio Castelli
You mean changing repository build setting to off on kubic flavor? No, it must to be done in packaging level ie. specfile.
Yes, Sascha is looking into that (the changes to perform to our spec files). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412
Sascha Grunert
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412#c6
--- Comment #6 from Sascha Grunert
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412#c7
--- Comment #7 from Ludwig Nussel
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412#c8
--- Comment #8 from Ludwig Nussel
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412#c10
Sascha Grunert
the docker packages in leap are from SLE. Could you please apply the fixes on top of SLE and submit to SLE maintenance?
Is this intended somehow? If not I would submit it from openSUSE:Factory, too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412#c11
Ludwig Nussel
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412#c12
--- Comment #12 from Sascha Grunert
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412#c13
--- Comment #13 from Sascha Grunert
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412#c14
Flavio Castelli
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412#c17
--- Comment #17 from Swamp Workflow Management
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412#c18
--- Comment #18 from Swamp Workflow Management
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412#c22
--- Comment #22 from Swamp Workflow Management
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412
Swamp Workflow Management
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412#c23
--- Comment #23 from Swamp Workflow Management
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121412
Swamp Workflow Management
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com