http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600471 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600471#c1 --- Comment #1 from Stephan Kulow 2010-04-28 14:28:56 CEST --- to make it clear: that the error exists is to be expected, just that it talks about no provider is strange - it used to say "package openSUSE-release-usb-x11" does not exist -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600471 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600471#c3 --- Comment #3 from Michael Schröder 2010-04-28 13:15:57 UTC --- IMHO it shouldn't bother the user with messages about capability matching if no package providing the capability exists. (That's if no --name or -C is given.) And it shouldn't do capability matching when it splits <name>-<version>, it should match only the NEVR. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600471 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600471#c5 Ján Kupec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Ján Kupec 2010-06-01 15:53:28 UTC --- yup, fixed in 1.4.4, commit 15798dc: If name-version is auto-split, don't try caps (bnc #600471) - not much worth trying caps if the name is not found and a versioned capability was request (even auto-split). Although i also wanted to do something about "it shouldn't bother the user with messages about capability matching if no package providing the capability exists" i guess that can be done later and this report can be closed. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.