[Bug 288879] New: getaddrinfo returns duplicate results
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288879 Summary: getaddrinfo returns duplicate results Product: openSUSE 10.3 Version: Alpha 5 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: pbaudis@novell.com ReportedBy: rhafer@novell.com QAContact: qa@suse.de Found By: --- I have a strange issue here that keeps the OpenLDAP testsuite from finishing successfully (and causing the build to fail). Hence severity == Major. OpenLDAP uses the getaddrinfo() to find out all the interfaces it should bind/listen() on. Under certain cirumstances the currently used glibc in STABLE returns duplicate entries and slapd fails to start getting EADDRINUSE upon the bind() call. I was able to create a small testcase that to reproduce the problem. I'll attach it to this bug. Note that the problem only seems to exist if I call gethostbyname_r before the call to getaddrinfo. Without it getaddrinfo seems to work as expected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288879#c1 --- Comment #1 from Ralf Haferkamp <rhafer@novell.com> 2007-07-02 08:13:18 MST --- Created an attachment (id=149162) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=149162) Testcase -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288879#c4 Petr Baudis <pbaudis@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pgajdos@novell.com --- Comment #4 from Petr Baudis <pbaudis@novell.com> 2007-08-21 09:13:30 MST --- Sorry for the delay, I took for granted that I've found the bug but I really didn't, and NSS isn't pretty to trace through. The problem is that currently, glibc takes ::1 /etc/hosts entry as 127.0.0.1 if you are looking up IPv4 instead of IPv6. And as apparently one of the few distributions, ::1 is associated with localhost instead of ip6-localhost on SUSE. Thus, nss_files "sees" 127.0.0.1 twice in /etc/hosts for localhost. What are our possibilities? (i) We revert the glibc change to take ::1 as 127.0.0.1. (ii) We rename IPv6 localhost record to ip6-localhost like most of other distributions, at the price of maybe a bit less smooth IPv6 integration (?) (based on some googling it just seems to create trouble for our users who don't care about IPv6 anyway, and IPv6-savvy users should find their way through). (iii) We get rid of the 127.0.0.1 entry and just keep ::1. "No-legacy" setup, but in theory might be confusing for the users. Things might get rough if you run app linked against old libc with libc + nss modules in custom LD_LIBRARY_PATH, and maybe in some other cases I'm not thinking of. (iv) We fix applications to expect duplicate addresses in getaddrinfo() output (I couldn't find anything saying that there must not be duplicate addresses there). I think obviously (i) is good only as a short-term measure at best. (iv) isn't overally very friendly. (iii) would be ideal but even if we decide to go for it we clearly can't do that for 10.3 at least anymore. So my preference is (ii). Your thoughts? I'm also Cc'ing /etc/hosts maintainer, and asked Ulrich why did he make this change at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288879#c5 --- Comment #5 from Ralf Haferkamp <rhafer@novell.com> 2007-08-29 03:14:49 MST --- Hm, I would fine with (ii) as well. (as long as we get a working openldap packet for 10.3 after that, of course. :) ) Strangely enough I just noticed that the test programm from the attachment (and also make test from openldap) doesn't fail anymore on a plain Beta2 installation, but it still fails inside the 10.3 (STABLE) build changeroot running on a 10.2. Back when I reported this bug the test programm also failed on a 10.3 (alpha5) installation and not only in the build environment. Any idea what changed since then? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288879#c6 Petr Baudis <pbaudis@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |pgajdos@novell.com --- Comment #6 from Petr Baudis <pbaudis@novell.com> 2007-08-29 03:28:35 MST --- Curious, what's the contents on /etc/hosts on the plain Beta2 installation? NEEDINFO on pgajdos for his opinion about the /etc/hosts change. Of course Urlich didn't reply to my mail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288879#c7 --- Comment #7 from Ralf Haferkamp <rhafer@novell.com> 2007-08-29 03:32:52 MST --- (In reply to comment #6 from Petr Baudis)
Curious, what's the contents on /etc/hosts on the plain Beta2 installation? Look like the same as it was on 10.2. I'll attach the file.
NEEDINFO on pgajdos for his opinion about the /etc/hosts change.
Of course Urlich didn't reply to my mail. Well, who might have guessed that. :)
-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288879#c8 --- Comment #8 from Ralf Haferkamp <rhafer@novell.com> 2007-08-29 03:35:01 MST --- Created an attachment (id=160604) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=160604) /etc/hosts file from Beta2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288879#c9 --- Comment #9 from Petr Gajdos <pgajdos@novell.com> 2007-08-29 10:40:04 MST --- Apologize, I haven't good knowledge base in this area, so it's up to you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288879#c10 Petr Baudis <pbaudis@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Info Provider|pgajdos@novell.com | --- Comment #10 from Petr Baudis <pbaudis@novell.com> 2007-08-29 10:48:39 MST --- Ralf, can I get access to that Beta2 installation where it works, please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288879#c11 --- Comment #11 from Petr Baudis <pbaudis@novell.com> 2007-08-29 11:04:37 MST --- Files now as glibc bug 4980 in order to hopefully get more information from Ulrich. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288879#c12 --- Comment #12 from Ralf Haferkamp <rhafer@novell.com> 2007-08-29 11:32:40 MST --- (In reply to comment #10 from Petr Baudis)
Ralf, can I get access to that Beta2 installation where it works, please? It's a machine in my home office. But if you send me your public ssh key I can setup an account for you. Do you need root access?
-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288879#c13 --- Comment #13 from Petr Baudis <pbaudis@novell.com> 2007-08-30 03:34:50 MST --- If you install the debuginfo packages I shouldn't need root access. My public ssh key is ssh-dss 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 pasky@machine Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288879#c14 --- Comment #14 from Ralf Haferkamp <rhafer@novell.com> 2007-08-30 05:14:02 MST --- (In reply to comment #13 from Petr Baudis)
If you install the debuginfo packages I shouldn't need root access. I installed glibc-debuginfo, just tell me if you need more.
My public ssh key is
ssh-dss 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 pasky@machine
Ok, I'll send you the details by PM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288879#c15 Petr Baudis <pbaudis@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |rhafer@novell.com --- Comment #15 from Petr Baudis <pbaudis@novell.com> 2007-09-05 05:20:11 MST --- Ah, simple when you find it out. nscd is running in fresh installation, and it ensures the uniquity of results. Andreas, can you think of someone who might have any objections against (ii) or should we just go ahead and do it? Oops, apparently bugzilla has thrown an error for my last comment submission and I didn't notice - sorry for sending it only now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288879 Petr Baudis <pbaudis@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Info Provider|rhafer@novell.com |aj@novell.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288879#c16 Andreas Jaeger <aj@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aj@novell.com Info Provider|aj@novell.com |kukuk@novell.com --- Comment #16 from Andreas Jaeger <aj@novell.com> 2007-09-05 08:21:43 MST --- Thorsten, could you decide, please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288879#c17 Thorsten Kukuk <kukuk@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kukuk@novell.com Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Info Provider|kukuk@novell.com | --- Comment #17 from Thorsten Kukuk <kukuk@novell.com> 2007-09-05 08:29:55 MST --- I don't understand why glibc was changed to handle ::1 equal to 127.0.0.1 Between, ::1 has ipv6-localhost and localhost, and this setup is valid. Removing localhost is wrong, both addresses are really "localhost". ii) is no option for me, because this breaks usage if you have IPv6 only daemons running, people don't expect that in this case "localhost" isn't working anymore. iii) may confuse applications using libresolv or derivates from bind, who don't know about the latest glibc change. iv) I'm not sure if duplicate entries are really allowed/to be expected. But have also no time to dig through all the RFCs. So in the end I see only i), but without knowing why the change was made, it is complicated to decide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288879#c18 --- Comment #18 from Petr Baudis <pbaudis@novell.com> 2007-09-05 08:41:17 MST --- Ulrich doesn't want to tell anyone why he made it, apprently. :( I think (i) is unsustainable in longer term, and I guess (iv) is just the way to go long term - I haven't found in any RFCs or specs a requirement for unique results from getaddrinfo(). I'm just not completely comfortable with going (iv) for 10.3 already, on the other hand we've apparently seen no further breakages except of openldap testsuite and it's not probable that we would see more if we'd postpone this as post-10.3. So in the end I think openldap testsuite should just get fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288879#c19 --- Comment #19 from Ralf Haferkamp <rhafer@novell.com> 2007-09-05 08:52:37 MST --- (In reply to comment #18 from Petr Baudis)
Ulrich doesn't want to tell anyone why he made it, apprently. :( I think (i) is unsustainable in longer term, But for 10.3 it should be doable.
and I guess (iv) is just the way to go long term - I haven't found in any RFCs or specs a requirement for unique results from getaddrinfo(). I'm just not completely comfortable with going (iv) for 10.3 already, on the other hand we've apparently seen no further breakages except of openldap testsuite and it's not probable that we would see more if we'd postpone this as post-10.3. As the problem only appears when explictly listening to the "localhost" interface it might also be that no one else tested this for other application on 10.3 yet.
So in the end I think openldap testsuite should just get fixed. It's not the testsuite that has this problem the testsuite just triggers it. If it needs to be fixed anywhere then that must be inside the server code. But I am very uncomfortable of changing the respective OpenLDAP code this late in the 10.3 timeframe.
-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288879#c20 --- Comment #20 from Petr Baudis <pbaudis@novell.com> 2007-09-06 01:54:26 MST --- But will anyone test it on 10.4 either? We don't gain anything by waiting more. Yes, reverting that change should be doable for 10.3, but I'm not terribly comfortable with changing glibc either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288879#c21 Stephan Kulow <coolo@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |coolo@novell.com --- Comment #21 from Stephan Kulow <coolo@novell.com> 2007-09-08 01:02:42 MST --- Just for the record: I'm not comfortable either - especially as we're still unsure about the reasoning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288879#c22 --- Comment #22 from Petr Baudis <pbaudis@novell.com> 2007-09-11 10:06:17 MST --- I discussed it with Ralf in person and since change in glibc will be probably much simpler and Ralf is travelling during whole September, we came to conclusion that it will be best to fix it in glibc for 10.3 and in openldap for the next releases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288879#c23 Petr Baudis <pbaudis@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |rhafer@novell.com --- Comment #23 from Petr Baudis <pbaudis@novell.com> 2007-09-13 14:49:03 MST --- Submitted glibc with this reverted; NEEDINFO on Ralf for confirmation that openldap builds now and for fixing openldap after 10.3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288879#c24 --- Comment #24 from Ralf Haferkamp <rhafer@novell.com> 2007-09-19 01:58:24 MST --- Verified that openldap2 now builds on i386. All other archs still fail, but I guess that's because the glibc did not build there yet. According to /work/built/dists/all/x86_64/packs-x86_64/glibc/glibc-2.6.1/Logfile.glibc.spec glibc currently fails on x86_64 with: RPM build errors: File not found: /var/tmp/glibc-2.6.1-build/etc/gai.conf I will check again later ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288879#c25 Ralf Haferkamp <rhafer@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|pbaudis@novell.com |rhafer@novell.com Severity|Critical |Normal Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Component|Basesystem |Basesystem Info Provider|rhafer@novell.com | Product|openSUSE 10.3 |openSUSE 11.0 Version|Alpha 5 |unspecified --- Comment #25 from Ralf Haferkamp <rhafer@novell.com> 2007-09-25 15:57:31 MST --- Ok, seems to work for 10.3 now. Moving this bug to 11.0 as a reminder to work on a real fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288879#c26 --- Comment #26 from Ralf Haferkamp <rhafer@novell.com> 2007-11-29 07:53:28 MST --- I just committed a patched OpenLDAP 2.4 to Beta (where a glibc without the workaround is available). slapd will now check for duplicates in the getaddrinfo results. I'll submit it to STABLE as soon as I am done with the OpenLDAP 2.4 update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288879#c27 --- Comment #27 from Ralf Haferkamp <rhafer@novell.com> 2007-11-29 08:11:25 MST --- Upstream Bug: http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Incoming?id=5251;page=1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288879#c28 Ralf Haferkamp <rhafer@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |pbaudis@novell.com --- Comment #28 from Ralf Haferkamp <rhafer@novell.com> 2007-11-29 09:39:46 MST --- The fact that getaddrinfo() only returns duplicates if you call if after a call to gethostbyname_r() or after a getaddrinfo() call with the AI_CANONNAME-Flag set, still makes we wonder if there isn't a bug in glibc here. This seems pretty bogus and doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. Do you really thing that this behavior is correct? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288879#c29 Ralf Haferkamp <rhafer@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rhafer@novell.com AssignedTo|rhafer@novell.com |pbaudis@novell.com Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Info Provider|pbaudis@novell.com | --- Comment #29 from Ralf Haferkamp <rhafer@novell.com> 2007-11-30 02:21:13 MST --- I did some more testing and I really thing this is a glibc bug (OpenLDAP upstream seems to agree with that as well). E.g. the following code calls getaddrinfo() twice with the same parameters and returns different results for both calls (1. call returns two addrinfo structs, 2. call returns three). How can this be desired? ------------------------------------------- #include <unistd.h> #include <string.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/socket.h> #include <netdb.h> int main () { int rc; struct addrinfo hints, *res, *iter; int ret, count; memset( &hints, '\0', sizeof(hints) ); hints.ai_flags = AI_PASSIVE | AI_CANONNAME; hints.ai_socktype = SOCK_STREAM; hints.ai_family = AF_UNSPEC; ret = getaddrinfo("localhost", "9009", &hints, &res); for (iter = res, count=0; iter; count++, iter = iter->ai_next) { } printf("1. getaddrinfo: %d results\n", count); ret = getaddrinfo("localhost", "9009", &hints, &res); printf("getaddrinfo returned %d\n",ret); if (ret) { exit(1); } for (iter = res, count=0; iter; count++, iter = iter->ai_next) { } printf("2. getaddrinfo: %d results\n", count); } ---------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288879 User rhafer@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288879#c30 Ralf Haferkamp <rhafer@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |openSUSE 11.1 --- Comment #30 from Ralf Haferkamp <rhafer@novell.com> 2008-09-09 05:37:31 MDT --- According to the upstream bug the behavior has been fixed meanwhile: http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4980#c18 This seems to be true. With current glibc in STABLE I no longer need the workaround patch in openldap2 anymore. I'll set this to FIXED now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com