[Bug 542051] New: xfs font server is poorly installed; standard security risk of using nobody
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051 Summary: xfs font server is poorly installed; standard security risk of using nobody Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.1 Version: Final Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.1 Status: NEW Severity: Minor Priority: P5 - None Component: X.Org AssignedTo: bnc-team-xorg-bugs@forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: suse@tlinx.org QAContact: xorg-maintainer-bugs@forge.provo.novell.com Found By: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-UTF-8; rv:1.9.1.3) Gecko/20090824 Firefox/3.5.3 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729) Found a couple of problems (none making xfs non functional, BTW), concerning the xfs font server that wouldn't be difficult to address and would improve security, fix-a-log-typo, and might easily make it more robust in the long term. 1) the startup script doesn't use any sysconfig file for parameters -- they are hard-coded. Arguments, ideally, should be in 'variables' in sysconfig. (I think of this of the equivalent of using numbers in programing vs. defined constants...generally not a great idea). 2) consistancy w/man page on how daemon runs: daemon man page (xfs(1)), says that if xfs is given the '-droppriv' argument, it will drop it's privs and try to run as "user.group" = "xfs.xfs'. Why shouldn't it do that by default? Instead, someone put it in the global user&group 'nobody' (now considered a common security vulnerability when multiple daemons all run in the same user and group). The install package should create the group: groupadd -r xfs and the user and group, preferring uid=gid (reasoning is multi-variate and too much to go into here, but it's of low pain/difficulty, raises security and can make life simpler later on -- especially if _all_ services install like this...). useradd --preferred-uid=$(grep /etc/group|cut -f3 -d: ) -r -g xfs xfs (or if you want to just try it and give an error on fail:) useradd -uid=$(grep /etc/group|cut -f3 -d: ) -r -g xfs xfs (depending on the 'collision', the "-o" switch might be accpetable -- i.e. if it is another service, unlikely to create any cross-chatter with xfs...but generally might be better to move "xfs's" group to a clear location). Now the rcscript shouldn't have to remove /tmp/.font-server and recreate it. Instead, it should (to be safe), check permissions -- if owned by xfs.xfs, then it _could_ check permissions to see it's not writeable by 'other' (but that can be a setting in /etc/permissions). If it does exist, to be safe, it should rename it to ".fontserver.user.group.mtime" (whatever user/group owns it with it's last mod-time. That should avoid any dangerous collisions and avoid potential data loss -- not to mention NOT, disturbing, any user-run 'xfs' font-server already running (if xfs uses relative pathnames after 'cd'ing to it's "home dir").). Wouldn't work windows, but we aren't on windows...:-). 3rd issue: a 'clarity issue') Even though parts of the X literature refer to it as the 'font server', the choice of "/var/log/fs-errors" seems poor. perhaps "xfs-errors", or better, "XFontServ-errors" (or more easily discernable as what the log belongs to). 'fs-errors' looks like file system, and xfs could be the xfs-file system... Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051 Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P5 - None |P4 - Low Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |sndirsch@novell.com Summary|xfs font server is poorly |xfs: some minor issues |installed; standard | |security risk of using | |nobody | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051 Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bnc-team-xorg-bugs@forge.pr |sndirsch@novell.com |ovo.novell.com | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051 User suse@tlinx.org added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051#c1 --- Comment #1 from L. A. Walsh <suse@tlinx.org> 2009-10-02 09:37:29 MDT --- Created an attachment (id=320840) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=320840) sample xfs startup script Attaching sample changes to /etc/init.d/xfs startup script -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051 User suse@tlinx.org added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051#c2 --- Comment #2 from L. A. Walsh <suse@tlinx.org> 2009-10-02 09:44:58 MDT --- Created an attachment (id=320841) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=320841) sample nscd.conf, running as user ncsd Note, .conf file requires usr.grp==nscd.nscd be created by install script -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051 User suse@tlinx.org added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051#c3 --- Comment #3 from L. A. Walsh <suse@tlinx.org> 2009-10-02 10:44:46 MDT --- the rc and conf scripts require 1) user.group == nscd.nscd be created by install 2) NOTE install script must not use -u optionn to startproc, or nscd will exit with failure (won't be able to switch itself to 'nscd and it's associated groups) 3) default perms on /var/run/nscd/socket, need to be set to /var/run/nscd/ nscd:nscd 755 /var/run/nscd/socket nscd:nscd 666 It's currently set to be owned by root. /etc/permissions{X} changes: (Using bits rwx=421 (in case my memory is faulty, documenting my assumption): for ugo:) 3) /etc/permissions should have: (allow all read/write access - normal) /var/run/nscd set to nscd:nscd 3755 /var/run/nscd/socket to nscd:nscd 666 4) /etc/permissions.secure to /var/run/nscd/ set to nscd:nscd 3751 /var/run/ncsd/socket to nscd:nscd 666 (Requires users be in group nscd to read dir contents but others would still be able to use nscd). 5) /etc/permissions.paranoid to: /var/run/nscd/ set to nscd:nscd 3710 /var/run/ncsd/socket to nscd:nscd 660 6) <separate package bug: texlive creates permissions files in /etc/permissions.d: texlive, texlive.paranoid) -- it should NOT reset permissions on 'var/cache, var/cache/ls-R. (minimum), and probably should not set permissions on subdirs, inconsistent with parent (should follow from above permissions). But MINIMUM -- shouldn't be resetting 'xfs' owned "/var/cache/fonts"... (no one can see contents of dir except root & user nscd; ONLY users in group nscd dir can use the nscd caching daemon) - others get whatever other defaults are configured in /etc/nsswitch... NOTE: I haven't tested the 'secure' or 'paranoid' settings -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051 Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #320840|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051 Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #320841|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051 User sndirsch@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051#c4 Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbaudis@novell.com, | |werner@novell.com --- Comment #4 from Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@novell.com> 2009-10-02 10:55:04 MDT --- Adding Petr and Werner due to the proposals for nscd and texlive. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051 User suse@tlinx.org added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051#c5 --- Comment #5 from L. A. Walsh <suse@tlinx.org> 2009-10-02 11:19:56 MDT --- re texlive permission settings: noted specifically/separately for textlive in bug 543849. (as it was a separate package, thought it should be recorded separately even though it is mentioned in this bug). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051 User pbaudis@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051#c6 --- Comment #6 from Petr Baudis <pbaudis@novell.com> 2009-10-05 04:15:30 MDT --- I'm sorry, I'm a bit lost here - in the bug description I see only XFS-related issue, then suddenly third comment is about nscd... Can you explain the connection, please? Could you consider adding your nscd recommendations to bug 520966, please? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051 User suse@tlinx.org added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051#c7 --- Comment #7 from L. A. Walsh <suse@tlinx.org> 2009-10-05 10:07:06 PDT --- Honestly, I am not, now, sure entirely why I added the nscd comments to this(xfs) bug ... I might have been trying to add them to a separate bug and something was screwy with my browser cache and I didn't look carefully to ensure the attachment was being attached to the bug I meant it to be. I thought I added a bug about nscd...as the bug you mention (I assume you mean 540966, which mentioned 'unscd', which is close to what we are talking about?; I don't have access to 520966?). I hadn't seen 540966 until this morning... and I can't find the bug I thought I was adding this attachment to -- so only think I can think of was that I was entering a bug for nscd, after I added the attachment for xfs, and at some point hit "backspace" when focus wasn't in a text window and didn't notice the entire bug went back to the xfs bug and 'disappearred' my entry for nscd.... been running on a bit too little sleep at times (it was ~3am, my time when I was entering these ... ;^/ As for adding the comments to bug 540966(is that what you meant?) is 'unscd' the same as nscd? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051 User pbaudis@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051#c8 --- Comment #8 from Petr Baudis <pbaudis@novell.com> 2009-10-06 01:38:11 MDT --- Yes, I'm sorry. Yes, unscd is what we currently use to provide the nscd servies. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051 User suse@tlinx.org added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051#c9 L. A. Walsh <suse@tlinx.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |security_vulnerability, | |Systemic Priority|P4 - Low |P3 - Medium Severity|Minor |Normal --- Comment #9 from L. A. Walsh <suse@tlinx.org> 2009-10-09 13:17:29 PDT --- Comments added to bug 540966, title changed to reflect product name. Extra notes added. added tags as security_vulnerability (minor), but unsanitary security practice to have multiple daemons all co-mingling in the 'nobody.nobody' pool Raising this bug's prio P3/Normal (from P4/Minor), since the 'nobody/nobody' issue seems to be systemic.... SuSE should be way past that security detail, IMO, but maybe the security folk I've hung with have overemphasized its importance more than others might consider it....dunno. The group I hung with was also concerned about 'covert' information leakage channels...so that's why this issue is important -- not _usually_ (AFAIK), from a system-corruption problem -- just a system-insecurity. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051 User sndirsch@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051#c10 Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P3 - Medium |P4 - Low Severity|Normal |Minor --- Comment #10 from Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@novell.com> 2009-10-09 14:37:05 MDT --- I really don't understand why you raise severity/priority here. Do you know *anybody*, who still uses xfs? It has never been running by default on SUSE - ever. It might have been interesting for CJK users relying on very big fonts in the past, which blocked the Xserver as the font needed to be loaded completely (not only the required glyph) with server side font rendering. But nowadays all common toolkits/desktops switched to client side rendering and thus no longer block the Xserver. There is no need to run xfs any more. I bet if we would drop it from distribution nobody would notice that and nobody would complain. Also I would appreciate it, if you would do submitrequests in our buildservice for the affected packages. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051 User suse@tlinx.org added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051#c11 L. A. Walsh <suse@tlinx.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |suse@tlinx.org --- Comment #11 from L. A. Walsh <suse@tlinx.org> 2009-10-09 15:28:00 PDT --- Would you please get off your high horse and stop making such a fuss about this? I thought I was doing the right thing and you have a cow. Give me a break. _I_ use the xfs fonts server quite a bit -- I keep my main stash of fonts on a server, and use them on my Windows client. I now have the disk space to also have them on my Windows client, BUT, the local X-server doesn't recognize all of them and/or Doesn't render them as well using the 'native' rendering agent, as the 'glyph' rendering agent does over the network. This is an **ACCESSIBILITY** issue for me -- as the fonts rendered by the local X-font server, for 'some' reason, do not have the option to have font-smoothing turned on. But for *some* reason, the ones' coming from xft DO -- I have a direct switch 1GB connection, so speed isn't an issue. Maybe if xfs wasn't, by default configured 'off', and people saw the difference, there'd be more use of it. I don't know -- there may be settings or tweaks I could do to make things look better, but I'm dealing with a cross-platform (cygwin client) situation where I'm using a poorly documented X-server that technically open-source, but not in a useful sense like SuSE's (they use a proprietary build system that I've never been able to get to work). But I have nearly 1GB of fonts and it's alot more efficient to store the fonts in one place and use 'xfs' than duplicate the store on each of my client systems -- some of which are ancient, but function fine as backup DNS/BDC's, running on a 20G system. And here I was just thinking about how xfs needed some updating to to have better security (like paying attention to the hosts.deny/permit files...etc). submit requests in your buildserver for the affected packages? What are you talking about? Im reporting bugs.... What's a submit requests? It's hard enough with my RSI problems to submit a bug in one place ... at least here I can keep track of all of the bugs and query them with one request. What is a submit request? I have not delved into the details of the opensuse build process or community...I'm just reporting QA items. I'm sorry if that is upsetting you -- please don't take it personally. I don't know anything about it -- so its not about you. I don't understand why you seem to have such a hostile tone over this. I don't believe I've said or entered anything that was particularly provocative -- at least not by conscious intention, so please, don't take out your upsets on me, and please don't treat xfs running as 'nobody.nobody' as a minor issue -- I changed it to the same level as the nscd as it's the same type of bug. It may have less priority, but the level of the bug is the same or GREATER, since this bug had more problems reported with it than the one with ncsd (which only had the bad-user/group problem). So can you explain why this is a "minor" bug while the other is normal? (Priority, I can leave that decision to you, as you seem to regard xfs as unimportant, and that's a value judgement, but the severity of the bug? Why is it 'minor'? Please separate out 'priority' to fix, (because it may be a low use product' from the severity of the bug. Running as user.group=nobody.nobody isn't considered minor by any serious security professional I know, but I may keep a different crowd than you. If you at least agree with my reasoning, please compromise by readadjusting the severity back up to 'normal'... (and please explain what this submit request thing is that I'm supposed to know about), and maybe, could you explain why you started off with such an irritated tone with me? Thanks, -linda -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051 User sndirsch@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051#c12 Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P4 - Low |P3 - Medium --- Comment #12 from Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@novell.com> 2009-10-10 05:18:59 MDT --- Ok. As you wish. I wasn't my intention sounding rude. I apologize for that. My hope was to get this issue fixed earlier by receiving already fixed packages, but I agree that getting familiar with the openSUSE buildservice takes some time. AFAIK there are HOWTOs available on opensuse.org, which provide a good introduction. Also there is a mailing list opensuse-packaging@opensuse.org, in case you have any questions about packaging. QA/filing bugs is one side. Not having enough developers ressources to address these issues is the other. :-( We would need a lot more help from the openSUSE community here to fix that situation. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051 User sndirsch@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051#c13 Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P3 - Medium |P4 - Low Severity|Minor |Normal --- Comment #13 from Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@novell.com> 2009-10-10 05:19:52 MDT --- mixed up severtiy/priority :-( -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051 User suse@tlinx.org added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051#c14 --- Comment #14 from L. A. Walsh <suse@tlinx.org> 2009-10-12 22:50:27 PDT --- In regard to the importance of 'xfs', I had an interesting exchange with someone who works for Lawrence Livermore labs. The said: (_emphasis_, mine...). " My biggest challenge is to get the xorg.conf file for my Linux clients to provide the researchers who I support with enough font choices for their apps. So, I can appreciate their complexity. I go from trying to hard code font paths into the config to running an _X_ _font_ _server_ on each system. Okay, so, “LTSP” is _Linux_ _terminal_ services. Basically, it’s a very thin Linux image that only runs X servers on whatever virtual terminals you tell it to run X servers on. So, you could have say, a Citrix client running on alt-ctrl-f3, a Linux GDM session to another server on alt-ctrl-f4, xeyes running on alt-ctrl-f5, xclock on alt-ctrl-f6, etc… The user community I support does a lot of computing on air gapped networks where their desktop systems are prohibited from having hard drives. Thus, the emphasis on diskless computing." ========= I replied to them about my recent interaction on this bug and SuSE's belief that 'xfs' was virtually unused and could probably be dropped with no one noticing. They replied to me: "We use NVIDIA graphics cards exclusively. The proprietary driver software automatically creates the X config file (/etc/xorg.conf). In most cases, it assigns the following as the Fontpath: FontPath “unix/:7100” That’s the TCP port of the X font server." ============= Maybe a guess, but the hardware rendering of the Nvidia graphics card might make use of the glyphs to create better typography on the screen if it is available. Having access to the direct glyphs might allow some accelerated, finely crafted fonts...? I haven't been able to get my NVIDIA X-server configured under Suse, so I can't say what the X-fonts look like when served by xfs vs. not. I do get alot better X-font rendering by turning off the auto-hinter and letting the fonts do anti-aliasing with 'ttf- code, but I also have most of the windows fonts available to my X-servers. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051 Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|xfs: some minor issues |xfs runs as user nobody -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051#c Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|xfs runs as user nobody |JJ: xfs runs as user nobody -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051#c Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|X.Org |X.Org Version|Final |Milestone 4 Product|openSUSE 11.1 |openSUSE 11.3 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051#c16 Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|JJ: xfs runs as user nobody |xfs runs as user nobody --- Comment #16 from Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@novell.com> 2010-08-14 23:38:40 UTC --- Obviously nobody is interested into this junior job. Adjusting subject. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051#c Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|X.Org |X.Org Version|Milestone 4 |Milestone 5 of 6 Product|openSUSE 11.3 |openSUSE 11.4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051#c17 Jason Craig <signup@sixaxisdesign.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|Milestone 5 of 6 |RC 1 --- Comment #17 from Jason Craig <signup@sixaxisdesign.com> 2011-02-20 22:32:45 UTC --- Still present in RC1--starting xfs with "rcxfs start" starts the daemon as user nobody. (changed during the 2011-02-20 Open-Bugs-Day about bugs for obsolete versions of openSUSE) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051#c18 Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO InfoProvider| |suse@tlinx.org --- Comment #18 from Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@suse.com> 2011-09-01 14:22:01 UTC --- Unfortunately we do not have the ressources to address that issue still for openSUSE 11.4. Could you please test again with a current Milestone of openSUSE 12.1, whether the issue still exists and give me feedback about the result? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051#c Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED InfoProvider|suse@tlinx.org | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542051#c19 Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FEATURE --- Comment #19 from Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@suse.com> 2011-10-12 11:02:51 UTC --- Such a change should be tracked as feature request. --> https://features.opensuse.org/ Of course you can refer to this bugreport. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com