https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806310 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806310#c1 Michal Vyskocil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P5 - None |P3 - Medium Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Michal Vyskocil 2013-03-05 10:24:00 UTC --- Hi, this is because native packages provides zlib = %{version}-%{release} and obsoletes < %{version}-%{release}, so the newest package is automatically replaced. On the other had this is not possible via baselibs.conf where release it not available. I've fix that removing version from obsoletes, which seems to work well rpm -q zlib-32bit zlib-32bit-1.2.7-2.1.2.x86_64 # test using just build package (with even lower release number, than installed zlib-32bit) $ zypper dup -r zlib-test Loading repository data... Reading installed packages... Computing distribution upgrade... The following NEW package is going to be installed: libz1-32bit The following package is going to be REMOVED: zlib-32bit The following package is going to be downgraded: libz1 The following package is going to change vendor: libz1 openSUSE -> obs://build.opensuse.org/devel:libraries:c_c++ 1 package to downgrade, 1 new, 1 to remove, 1 to change vendor. Overall download size: 101.7 KiB. No additional space will be used or freed after the operation. Continue? [y/n/?] (y): So ignore the downgraded and vendor change lines, they won't appear in official packages. Submitted to Factory: 157346 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806310 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806310#c3 Michal Vyskocil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Michal Vyskocil 2013-03-05 13:44:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2)

Hmm, I'm not sure if a unversioned obsoletes is the best idea. Yes, it works, but it also means that it will never ever possible to install a package named "zlib-32bit" again as long as libz1-32bit is installed.

I would say the risc is quite low - especially if libz1-32bit is made from zlib.src.rpm.

Specifying the version (hardcoded to the latest version with the old name) might be the better choice, like Obsoletes: zlib-32bit <= 1.2.7

As you wish - 157375 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806310 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806310#c5 Bernhard Wiedemann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bwiedemann@suse.com --- Comment #5 from Bernhard Wiedemann 2013-03-06 10:43:10 CET --- https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/157375 Factory / zlib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.