[Bug 1160276] New: libiscsi fails with -fno-common
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1160276 Bug ID: 1160276 Summary: libiscsi fails with -fno-common Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: bnc-team-screening@forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: martin.liska@suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs@suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- The package fails here: https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/openSUSE:Factory:Staging:M... Please take a look at the META issue for the instructions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1160276 Martin Liška <martin.liska@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1160244 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1160276 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1160276#c2 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška <martin.liska@suse.com> --- (In reply to Martin Pluskal from comment #1)
Reported upstream in https://github.com/sahlberg/libiscsi/issues/308
It's fixed upstream, can you please cherry pick the fix? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1160276 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1160276#c3 Martin Pluskal <mpluskal@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Martin Pluskal <mpluskal@suse.com> --- Should be resolved now -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1160276 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1160276#c5 Martin Liška <martin.liska@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED |--- --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška <martin.liska@suse.com> --- There's a lot of new failures: https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/openSUSE:Factory:Staging:N... [ 56s] /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/10/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: test_writeverify12_0blocks.o (symbol from plugin): in function `test_writeverify12_0blocks': [ 56s] (.text+0x0): multiple definition of `no_medium_ascqs'; iscsi-test-cu.o (symbol from plugin):(.text+0x0): first defined here [ 56s] /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/10/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: test_writeverify12_wrprotect.o (symbol from plugin): in function `test_writeverify12_wrprotect': [ 56s] (.text+0x0): multiple definition of `invalid_cdb_ascqs'; iscsi-test-cu.o (symbol from plugin):(.text+0x0): first defined here [ 56s] /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/10/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: test_writeverify12_wrprotect.o (symbol from plugin): in function `test_writeverify12_wrprotect': [ 56s] (.text+0x0): multiple definition of `copy_aborted_ascqs'; iscsi-test-cu.o (symbol from plugin):(.text+0x0): first defined here [ 56s] /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/10/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: test_writeverify12_wrprotect.o (symbol from plugin): in function `test_writeverify12_wrprotect': [ 56s] (.text+0x0): multiple definition of `miscompare_ascqs'; iscsi-test-cu.o (symbol from plugin):(.text+0x0): first defined here [ 56s] /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/10/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: test_writeverify12_wrprotect.o (symbol from plugin): in function `test_writeverify12_wrprotect': [ 56s] (.text+0x0): multiple definition of `removal_ascqs'; iscsi-test-cu.o (symbol from plugin):(.text+0x0): first defined here [ 56s] /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/10/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: test_writeverify12_wrprotect.o (symbol from plugin): in function `test_writeverify12_wrprotect': [ 56s] (.text+0x0): multiple definition of `sanitize_ascqs'; iscsi-test-cu.o (symbol from plugin):(.text+0x0): first defined here [ 56s] /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/10/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: test_writeverify12_wrprotect.o (symbol from plugin): in function `test_writeverify12_wrprotect': [ 56s] (.text+0x0): multiple definition of `write_protect_ascqs'; iscsi-test-cu.o (symbol from plugin):(.text+0x0): first defined here [ 56s] /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/10/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: test_writeverify12_wrprotect.o (symbol from plugin): in function `test_writeverify12_wrprotect': [ 56s] (.text+0x0): multiple definition of `unsupp_desc_code_ascqs'; iscsi-test-cu.o (symbol from plugin):(.text+0x0): first defined here [ 56s] /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/10/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: test_writeverify12_wrprotect.o (symbol from plugin): in function `test_writeverify12_wrprotect': -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1160276 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1160276#c6 Martin Liška <martin.liska@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |IN_PROGRESS Assignee|mpluskal@suse.com |martin.liska@suse.com --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška <martin.liska@suse.com> --- I've just made SR#798384. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1160276 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1160276#c7 Martin Liška <martin.liska@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška <martin.liska@suse.com> --- Fixed in devel project again. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com