https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300515#c1 --- Comment #1 from Shane Huang 2007-08-14 21:11:13 MST --- Created an attachment (id=157554) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=157554) SB600/SB700/SB800 use same SMBus controll device ID Besides removing the SB700 wrong patch, the attached patch add SB800 support to kernel as well as SB700. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300515#c3 --- Comment #3 from Shane Huang 2007-08-14 23:00:27 MST --- I have sent this patch to i2c maintainer Jean Delvare and i2c@lm-sensors.org before I created this bugzilla item. I think they will add this patch into the linux kernel source tree after their review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300515#c5 --- Comment #5 from Shane Huang 2007-08-16 03:39:53 MST --- This patch has been accepted by linux i2c maintainer, and will appear from linux-2.6.23-rc4 most probably. I will present the git link of this patch after I get it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300515#c7 Shane Huang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Info Provider|shane.huang@amd.com | --- Comment #7 from Shane Huang 2007-08-20 20:13:57 MST --- My comments above have provided the needed information. thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300515#c9 Jean Delvare changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |jeffm@novell.com --- Comment #9 from Jean Delvare 2007-08-27 01:41:33 MST --- Support for the ATI SB600 SMBus is already included in openSuse 10.3 (it was added upstream in 2.6.21 and openSuse 10.3 is based on 2.6.22.) The bug (wrong PCI ID listed) which the attached patch fixes, was introduced upstream in 2.6.23-rc1. This means that openSuse 10.3 is not affected, and neither is 2.6.22 upstream, so there's nothing to fix there. Given that the SB700 and SB800 SMBus use the same PCI ID as the SB600 SMBus (and I thank AMD for this), they are already supported properly in openSuse 10.3. It's just not documented, but I don't think it's a problem. After all, the whole point of reusing the PCI IDs where possible is to avoid backporting patches, isn't it? So I think that this bug can be closed as invalid with no further action. Jeff, is this OK with you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300515#c11 --- Comment #11 from Shane Huang 2007-08-27 19:10:38 MST --- Hi Jeff, sorry for the unnecessary work to you. Usually when we create a kernel patch, we will submit it to kernel.org and many linux distributions to be released very soon through bugzillas. We will check it more carefully in the future to see whether the bugzilla is really valid to this distribution. Thanks. Shane -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.