[Bug 797205] New: splitting of cryptsetup-mkinitrd broke booting systems that reside on an encrypted lvm

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797205 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797205#c0 Summary: splitting of cryptsetup-mkinitrd broke booting systems that reside on an encrypted lvm Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Factory Version: 12.3 Milestone 1 Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: libzypp AssignedTo: zypp-maintainers@forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: lnussel@suse.com QAContact: qa-bugs@suse.de CC: lnussel@suse.com, mls@suse.com, cobexer@gmail.com, speilicke@suse.com, idonmez@suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #796167 +++ looks like zypp/sat-solver doesn't properly evaluate split-provides. See bug 796167 for details and test case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797205 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797205#c1 Ludwig Nussel <lnussel@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |werner@suse.com Summary|splitting of |split-provides don't work |cryptsetup-mkinitrd broke | |booting systems that reside | |on an encrypted lvm | --- Comment #1 from Ludwig Nussel <lnussel@suse.com> 2013-03-22 09:07:58 CET --- ping!? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797205 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797205#c2 Michael Schröder <mls@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #2 from Michael Schröder <mls@suse.com> 2013-03-22 12:37:44 UTC --- Not a bug. You have "cryptsetup-mkinitrd" on the soft-locks list. Note that split-provides are weak dependencies, i.e. it *must* be ok to ignore the provides. Mandatory package splits (whatever that is) can't be solved with split provides, they need to be enforced by something else. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797205 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797205#c3 --- Comment #3 from Ludwig Nussel <lnussel@suse.com> 2013-03-22 14:04:06 CET --- I wonder if that SoftLocks entry in the other bug came from the debugging session Sascha talked about. I doubt it has been there in the original zypper dup he made as the package didn't exist before. So it could be that the solver test case does not show the real situation. Just wanted to clarify that split-provides are still meant to work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797205 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797205#c4 Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@inai.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jengelh@inai.de --- Comment #4 from Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@inai.de> 2013-04-02 15:57:32 CEST --- When using --no-recommends (either by option or command line), packageand will not be processed. (See also bug #812944) Why do I use no-recommends? Because the Recommends: in specfiles causes the installation of quite some bloat. IMO, the meaning of --(no-)recommends should not be overloaded with the special packageand(..) supplements. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com