http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246#c1 James McDonough <jmcdonough@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jmcdonough@novell.com, | |samba-maintainers@SuSE.de AssignedTo|samba-maintainers@SuSE.de |sjayaraman@novell.com --- Comment #1 from James McDonough <jmcdonough@novell.com> 2010-01-24 19:35:12 UTC --- Suresh, please take a look. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246#c3 Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW --- Comment #3 from Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@novell.com> 2010-01-25 17:53:28 UTC --- Do you use IP address to mount or hostname? If you're using IP, could you try with hostname and check? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246#c4 --- Comment #4 from Robert Mueller <rmueller@thinxsolutions.com> 2010-02-17 09:23:23 UTC --- Sorry for the late answer, but I did not get an information per email about your comment. The problem initially occurred using pam_mount. pam_mount was configured for using server's hostname (but not fully qualified). After that I checked the issue without using pam_mount, doing a cifs mount directly on console. I do not exactly remember if this was with IP or hostname, but I think hostname. Result was the same, as described above. Before, with OpenSuSE 11.1 and identical server configuration, there was no such problem. If needed, I can verify this weekend if using server's hostname or IP makes any difference. BTW: On server side, I use dhcpd with dynamic update of DNS (bind9). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246#c6 Robert Mueller <rmueller@thinxsolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW CC| |rmueller@thinxsolutions.com Info Provider|rmueller@thinxsolutions.com | --- Comment #6 from Robert Mueller <rmueller@thinxsolutions.com> 2010-02-24 12:18:09 UTC --- So, tested it. It doesn't matter if i use IP or hostname: fliewatuet:/var/log # mount -t cifs //lilienthal/Austausch /Srv_Austausch -o user=rmueller Password: fliewatuet:/var/log # mount -t cifs //192.168.99.5/Ablage_DR /Srv_Ablage_DR -o user=rmueller Password: fliewatuet:/ # df -h Dateisystem GröÃe Benut Verf Ben% Eingehängt auf /dev/sda6 20G 6,3G 13G 34% / udev 3,0G 260K 3,0G 1% /dev /dev/sda1 97M 31M 62M 34% /boot lilienthal.example.com:/home/serverbased/rmueller 55G 7,4G 45G 15% /home/serverbased/rmueller //lilienthal/Austausch 373G 195G 178G 53% /Srv_Austausch //192.168.99.5/Ablage_DR 373G 195G 178G 53% /Srv_Ablage_DR Now the renew of the lease happens (/var/log/messages): Feb 24 12:45:37 fliewatuet dhcpcd[2440]: eth1: renewing lease of 192.168.9990 Feb 24 12:45:37 fliewatuet dhcpcd[2440]: eth1: leased 192.168.99.90 for 3000 seconds Feb 24 12:45:37 fliewatuet dhcpcd[2440]: eth1: adding IP address 192.168.99.90/24 Feb 24 12:45:37 fliewatuet dhcpcd[2440]: eth1: adding default route via 192.168.99.254 metric 0 Feb 24 12:45:37 fliewatuet ifup: eth1 device: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller (rev 02) and then: fliewatuet:/ # date Mi 24. Feb 12:49:39 CET 2010 fliewatuet:/ # df -h Dateisystem GröÃe Benut Verf Ben% Eingehängt auf /dev/sda6 20G 6,3G 13G 34% / udev 3,0G 260K 3,0G 1% /dev /dev/sda1 97M 31M 62M 34% /boot Interesting to me: The autofs NFS-mounted home-directory also disappears when it's not used. This time I tested from remote via ssh (root), so no idea why the homedir was mounted at bootup without any user logged in. Normally I didn't recognize that because I'm always logged in. Maybe a dhclient issue? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246#c8 Robert Mueller <rmueller@thinxsolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Info Provider|rmueller@thinxsolutions.com | --- Comment #8 from Robert Mueller <rmueller@thinxsolutions.com> 2010-03-06 21:58:17 UTC --- OK, I have 5 boxes connected to 2 different servers (3 in my office, 2 at home) showing immediately this issue after a fresh install of SuSE 11.2. All machines have had SuSE 11.1 / 10.3 before, without this problem. One server is an old SuSE 9.3 box, an therefore also an very old dhcpd, the other one is a Debian 5 with dhcp3-server package used. So I don't think it's an issue of dhcpd. Yesterday I noticed, that SuSE 11.2 installs both dhcpcd and dhclient package, and preferably uses dhcpcd, when nothing is configured in /etc/sysconfig/network/dhcp for the client binary. Now I changed this config to "dhclient", and the issue has gone. All mounts now survive an IP renewal. So it seems to be an dhcpcd related problem...... How can I test an older package of dhcpcd on SuSE 11.2 (if I should)? Is there any rpm-package which will work? Cheers, Robert -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246#c10 Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |RESOLVED Info Provider|rmueller@thinxsolutions.com | Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #10 from Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@novell.com> 2010-03-08 12:21:50 UTC --- I'm unable to reproduce the issue with the new updated dhcpcd. Please update your dhcpcd package. Please reopen this bug should you see the problem after updating. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246#c12 --- Comment #12 from Robert Mueller <rmueller@thinxsolutions.com> 2010-04-25 18:52:44 UTC --- Hi, for me the issue was immediately solved after I added the "-p" option to dhcpcd options in /etc/sysconfig/network/dhcp. For miscellaneous reasons this option seems not to be default anymore. Up to 11.1 this was probably the case. Up to this problem, I never spent time understanding what dhcp-client software does in detail - it always simply worked ;-) Hope that helps, Robert -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246#c14 Christian Eggers <ceggers@gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |REOPENED InfoProvider|ceggers@gmx.de | --- Comment #14 from Christian Eggers <ceggers@gmx.de> 2010-04-26 06:11:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9)

There was a known bug bnc#551376 that fixed a problem of '-p' option being not honoured. This fix is present in dhcpcd-3.2.3 and greater. openSUSE 11.2 is already shipped with dhcpcd-3.2.3-47.2. I'm using the latest version from openSUSE 11.2 updates (dhcpcd-3.2.3-47.4.1).

(In reply to comment #13)

There was a known bug in dhcpcd as mentioned in Comment #9. Please upgrade your dhcpcd version and try to use '-p' option and update whether the issue is still reproducible.

I've entered the -p option to DHCPCD_USER_OPTIONS in /etc/sysconfig/network/dhcp and rebooted the system. I cannot see any difference, the script "/etc/sysconfig/network/scripts/dhcpcd-hook [...] up" is still called every 5 minutes which in turn umounts all cifs shares. I cannot see that there might be anything wrong with dhcpcd (or its configuration). For me it seems to be obvious that either the call to "rcsmbfs restart" (in if-up.d/21-smbfs) should be changed, or rcsmbfs had to be reworked, that a stop/restart only umounts shares originally present in smbfstab. (but the latter would also be a poor solution because then some shares would be periodically remounted every few minutes) regards Christian -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246#c16 Christian Eggers <ceggers@gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |REOPENED InfoProvider|rmueller@thinxsolutions.com | --- Comment #16 from Christian Eggers <ceggers@gmx.de> 2010-04-26 18:52:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15)

This bug was not reproducible in my setup with dhclient and that is why I'm thinking this is a dhcpcd issue. Could you see whether it is reproducible when you use dhclient instead of dhcpcd?

It's not surprising that the problem doesn't exist with dhclient. With dhcpcd a complex script (/etc/sysconfig/network/scripts/dhcpcd-hook) is called periodically every time the lease is renewed. dhclient uses a completely different script (/sbin/dhclient-script) which is only called once after dhclient initially gets the lease. dhclient (at startup): ---------------------- ifup br0 --> ifup-dhcp br0 --> /sbin/dhclient --> /sbin/dhclient-script dhclient (at lease renewal): ---------------------- /sbin/dhclient <nothing> dhcpcd (at startup): -------------------- ifup br0 --> ifup-dhcp br0 --> /sbin/dhcpcd --> /etc/sysconfig/network/scripts/dhcpcd-hook --> ifdown br0 -o dhcp --> ifup br0 -o dhcp --> if-up.d/21-smbfs --> rcsmbfs restart dhcpcd (at lease renewal): -------------------------- /sbin/dhcpcd --> /etc/sysconfig/network/scripts/dhcpcd-hook --> ifup br0 -o dhcp --> if-up.d/21-smbfs --> rcsmbfs restart

Also I think this is nothing specific to cifs; any network filesystem should have the same behavior (for e.g. nfs mounts).

I don't know why the package "samba-client" places a script into /etc/sysconfig/network/if-up.d/ and the package "nfs-client" doesn't. Using dhclient instead of dhcpcd is no solution for me. Why not fixing the configuration for dhcpcd? regards Christian -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246#c18 Gustav Haapalahti <gushaa@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gushaa@gmail.com --- Comment #18 from Gustav Haapalahti <gushaa@gmail.com> 2010-05-01 16:59:48 UTC --- I also have this problem. If I run the command mount -t cifs //server/share /mnt/mountpoint the share gets mounted and it becomes present in in /etc/mtab When the dhcp lease is renewed the script "/etc/sysconfig/network/if-up.d/21-smbfs" is run which in turn calls /usr/sbin/rcsmbfs restart The rcsmbfs script runs the command "umount -at cifs" which will unmount all cifs mounts that are present in the mtab file. A workaround for this is to mount your cifs shares with mount -n -t cifs //server/share /mnt/mountpoint which will not put a line into the mtab file. This is however a workaround that should not be needed. PS. I use dhcpcd 3.2.3-47.4.1 Best Regards Gustav -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246#c19 Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |p.zinnauer@adfa.edu.au --- Comment #19 from Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@novell.com> 2010-05-13 08:36:55 UTC --- *** Bug 604097 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604097 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246#c21 Marius Tomaschewski <mt@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mt@novell.com --- Comment #21 from Marius Tomaschewski <mt@novell.com> 2010-06-22 11:51:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16)

(In reply to comment #15)

...

This bug was not reproducible in my setup with dhclient and that is why I'm thinking this is a dhcpcd issue. Could you see whether it is reproducible when you use dhclient instead of dhcpcd?

It's not surprising that the problem doesn't exist with dhclient. With dhcpcd a complex script (/etc/sysconfig/network/scripts/dhcpcd-hook) is called periodically every time the lease is renewed. dhclient uses a completely different script (/sbin/dhclient-script) which is only called once after dhclient initially gets the lease.

dhclient (at startup): ---------------------- ifup br0 --> ifup-dhcp br0 --> /sbin/dhclient --> /sbin/dhclient-script

dhclient (at lease renewal): ---------------------- /sbin/dhclient <nothing>

dhcpcd (at startup): -------------------- ifup br0 --> ifup-dhcp br0 --> /sbin/dhcpcd --> /etc/sysconfig/network/scripts/dhcpcd-hook --> ifdown br0 -o dhcp --> ifup br0 -o dhcp --> if-up.d/21-smbfs --> rcsmbfs restart

dhcpcd (at lease renewal): -------------------------- /sbin/dhcpcd --> /etc/sysconfig/network/scripts/dhcpcd-hook --> ifup br0 -o dhcp --> if-up.d/21-smbfs --> rcsmbfs restart

I'd say it is a broken 21-smbfs script, that ignores the -o dhcp options and restarts the smb/nmb on every "up" ("up ; up ; up" without a "down" between) without any reason / check. Note also: "new" arg to dhcpcd-hook != "dhcp renew": - "new" argument in dhcpcd-hook (dhcpcd --script interface) does not mean "renew" as the name may suggest. it means: new IP address => restart everything; the dhcpcd-hook calls "ifdown $iface -o dhcp ; ifup $iface -o dhcp" then. - "up" argument in dhcpcd-hook means, IP didn't changed changed since last reboot (==dhcp reboot state) and the interface configuration finished. that is, "up" basically means "renew". => just signal post-scripts that we are "up" now via "ifup -o dhcp". We've added an additional "complete" action to dhcpcd/dhcpcd-hook that is called after "up" and "new" and signals, that at this point really all configuration steps are complete, e.g. also the hostname is up-to-date. The "ifup $iface -o dhcp" is called in complete now. The difference is dhcpcd<->dhcpcd-hook internal: - before: up: ... ifup $iface -o dhcp new: ... ifdown $iface -o dhcp ; ifup $iface -o dhcp - current: up: ... new: ... ifdown $iface -o dhcp complete: ifup $iface -o dhcp Note also, that dhclient[-script] was not 100% integrated here and didn't executed any ifup / ifdown -o dhcp actions (that is if-up.d or ifservice scripts) until now. This has been completed/fixed in factory. BTW: See also "man 5 ifservices". -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246#c James McDonough <jmcdonough@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|samba-maintainers@SuSE.de |sjayaraman@novell.com -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246#c24 --- Comment #24 from Christian Eggers <ceggers@gmx.de> 2010-06-23 20:33:24 UTC --- Could you eventually solve this problem until release of 11.3? regards Christian -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246#c26 Lars Müller <lmuelle@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |REOPENED InfoProvider|lmuelle@novell.com | --- Comment #26 from Lars Müller <lmuelle@novell.com> 2010-06-29 16:39:01 UTC --- There is no diff between the init script of 11.1 (3.2.7) and 11.2 (3.4.3). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246#c28 Marius Tomaschewski <mt@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |REOPENED InfoProvider|mt@novell.com | --- Comment #28 from Marius Tomaschewski <mt@novell.com> 2010-07-02 09:26:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #27)

(In reply to comment #22)

...

(In reply to comment #8)

...

So it seems to be an dhcpcd related problem......

No. It is missed integration of the dhclient[-script] :-)

But IMO the reason for the problem is the restart in 21-smbfs without any reason / check, except that /etc/init.d/smb and nmb scripts are active.

This causes that when the system boots up, there is /etc/init.d/smb start and on _every_ "up" of an interface, 21-smbfs makes /etc/init.d/smb restart

There is no change between 11.1 and 11.2 in smb init script. If this is the issue, how come it didn't appear in 11.1 and earlier? Has something changed in Network manager or dhcpcd..?

If it is due to some other changes, then it is a regression caused by that component and not smb/cifs, right?

No, it isn't a regression in sysconfig. It is an incorrect 21-smbfs script. I _guess_ the umounts just failed before and didn't caused any problem. The dhcpcd hook on SLE-10 and I think already on SLES-9 also called the if-up.d scripts -- the ifup man page documents this. SuSEfirewall2 using the if-up.d interface would not refresh its rules without these calls. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246#c30 --- Comment #30 from Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@novell.com> 2010-07-07 11:55:04 UTC --- Looks like if we are able to get the 'state' value from /etc/sysconfig/network/scripts/dhcpcd-hook, then we could check if 'state' is 'new' and not 'up' and restart the rccifs script. Marius, Lars, any idea whether it is possible to pass this 'state' value down to 21-cifs script? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246#c32 --- Comment #32 from Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@novell.com> 2010-07-07 12:36:17 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=374259) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=374259) Proposed patch Could you patch /etc/sysconfig/network/if-up.d/21-cifs (preferably backup original file) with the changes attached and see whether it resolves the problem for you? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246#c34 Christian Eggers <ceggers@gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |REOPENED InfoProvider|ceggers@gmx.de | --- Comment #34 from Christian Eggers <ceggers@gmx.de> 2010-07-08 06:35:11 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=374482) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=374482) Modified patch for openSUSE 11.2 (In reply to comment #32)

Created an attachment (id=374259) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=374259) [details] Proposed patch

Could you patch /etc/sysconfig/network/if-up.d/21-cifs (preferably backup original file) with the changes attached and see whether it resolves the problem for you?

On 11.2, the file name is /etc/sysconfig/network/if-up.d/21-smbfs. Instead of patching the symlink I've created a patch for the target file (/etc/sysconfig/network/scripts/smbfs). Please note my change in the "if" condition, your syntax might be wrong: your if "$state" == "new" mine if [ "$state" = "new" ] Altogether the patch seems to work, my cifs mounts are not disconnected anymore. Additionally you might think about only unmounting shared listed in smbfstab instead of using "umount -at cifs" -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246#c Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |NEEDINFO InfoProvider| |lmuelle@novell.com -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246#c37 Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #37 from Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@novell.com> 2010-07-28 13:51:31 UTC --- Fix committed to 11.2 and 11.3. Marking this as Resolved Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246#c39 Swamp Workflow Management <swamp@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|maint:released:11.2:35755 |maint:released:11.3:35791 --- Comment #39 from Swamp Workflow Management <swamp@suse.com> 2010-09-22 16:24:12 UTC --- Update released for: ldapsmb, libldb-devel, libldb0, libldb0-debuginfo, libnetapi-devel, libnetapi0, libnetapi0-debuginfo, libsmbclient-devel, libsmbclient0, libsmbclient0-debuginfo, libsmbsharemodes-devel, libsmbsharemodes0, libsmbsharemodes0-debuginfo, libtalloc-devel, libtalloc2, libtalloc2-debuginfo, libtdb-devel, libtdb1, libtdb1-debuginfo, libtevent-devel, libtevent0, libtevent0-debuginfo, libwbclient-devel, libwbclient0, libwbclient0-debuginfo, samba, samba-client, samba-client-debuginfo, samba-debuginfo, samba-debugsource, samba-devel, samba-doc, samba-krb-printing, samba-krb-printing-debuginfo, samba-winbind, samba-winbind-debuginfo Products: openSUSE 11.3 (debug, i586, x86_64) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246#c42 Swamp Workflow Management <swamp@suse.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|maint:released:11.3:35791 |maint:released:11.3:35791 |maint:released:sle11-sp1:35 |maint:released:sle11-sp1:35 |750 |750 maint:running:52409:low --- Comment #42 from Swamp Workflow Management <swamp@suse.de> 2013-05-09 10:57:29 UTC --- The SWAMPID for this issue is 52409. This issue was rated as low. Please submit fixed packages until 2013-06-06. Also create a patchinfo file using this link: https://swamp.suse.de/webswamp/wf/52409 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573246#c Swamp Workflow Management <swamp@suse.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|maint:released:11.3:35791 |maint:released:11.3:35791 |maint:released:sle11-sp1:35 |maint:released:sle11-sp1:35 |750 maint:running:52409:low |750 |maint:released:sle10-sp4:52 |maint:released:sle10-sp4:52 |586 |586 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.