[Bug 1195707] New: What with new CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE_LEGACY_ACCELERATION?
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195707 Bug ID: 1195707 Summary: What with new CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE_LEGACY_ACCELERATION? Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: gfx-bugs@suse.de Reporter: jslaby@suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs@suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- 5.17-rc3 introduced CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE_LEGACY_ACCELERATION. What should we set it to? Currently we have:
origin/master:config/i386/pae:CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE_LEGACY_ACCELERATION=y origin/master:config/ppc64/default:# CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE_LEGACY_ACCELERATION is not set origin/master:config/ppc64le/default:# CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE_LEGACY_ACCELERATION is not set origin/master:config/riscv64/default:# CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE_LEGACY_ACCELERATION is not set origin/master:config/s390x/default:# CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE_LEGACY_ACCELERATION is not set origin/master:config/x86_64/default:# CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE_LEGACY_ACCELERATION is not set
Is this OK? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195707 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195707#c1 Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |patrik.jakobsson@suse.com, | |tiwai@suse.com, | |tzimmermann@suse.com Assignee|gfx-bugs@suse.de |kernel-bugs@opensuse.org --- Comment #1 from Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@suse.com> --- Honeslty, I don't know. I think Thomas, Patrik and Takashi are more competent here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195707 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195707#c2 --- Comment #2 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com> --- I guess we don't care much for now, as we're targeting more on simpledrm enablement. So I'd say the current config is fine. We can enable them later only if anyone gives a strong argument that options must be inevitably enabled. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195707 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195707#c3 Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #3 from Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com> --- I think noone cares :P. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com