[Bug 1208248] New: libopenblas-pthreads0 missing a file?
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248 Bug ID: 1208248 Summary: libopenblas-pthreads0 missing a file? Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: 64bit OS: openSUSE Tumbleweed Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: KDE Applications Assignee: opensuse-kde-bugs@opensuse.org Reporter: heikki@heikki-valisuo.fi QA Contact: qa-bugs@suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- digikam: error while loading shared libraries: libopenblas.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory ------ Yes, it's a package problem. The package libopenblas-pthreads0 should contain the file according to the package list, but it actually doesn't. https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465680 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248#c1 Christophe Marin <christophe@krop.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |heikki@heikki-valisuo.fi Flags| |needinfo?(heikki@heikki-val | |isuo.fi) --- Comment #1 from Christophe Marin <christophe@krop.fr> --- What does `rpm -qiv digikam` return? Also attach the output of `zypper lr -d` -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248#c2 Christophe Marin <christophe@krop.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dimstar@opensuse.org, | |opensuse-kde-bugs@opensuse. | |org Assignee|opensuse-kde-bugs@opensuse. |eich@suse.com |org | Flags|needinfo?(heikki@heikki-val | |isuo.fi) | --- Comment #2 from Christophe Marin <christophe@krop.fr> --- That's an issue in the openblas package. Despite being listed [1], libopenblas.so.0 is missing [1] [1] # rpm -ql libopenblas_pthreads0 /etc/alternatives/libblas.so.3_x86_64 /etc/alternatives/libcblas.so.3_x86_64 /etc/alternatives/liblapack.so.3_x86_64 /etc/alternatives/liblapacke.so.3_x86_64 /etc/alternatives/openblas-default_x86_64 /usr/lib64/libblas.so.3 /usr/lib64/libcblas.so.3 /usr/lib64/liblapack.so.3 /usr/lib64/liblapacke.so.3 /usr/lib64/libopenblas.so.0 /usr/lib64/openblas-default /usr/lib64/openblas-pthreads /usr/lib64/openblas-pthreads/libopenblas.so.0 [2] # ls -l /usr/lib64/libopenblas.so.0 ls: cannot access '/usr/lib64/libopenblas.so.0': No such file or directory # rpm -qi libopenblas_pthreads0 *Name : libopenblas_pthreads0 Version : 0.3.21 Release : 3.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248#c3 Bit Juggler <suse.junky@t-online.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |suse.junky@t-online.de --- Comment #3 from Bit Juggler <suse.junky@t-online.de> --- I can confirm the problem. The package libopenblas_pthreads0-0.3.21-2.1.x86_64.rpm contained a symlink /usr/lib64/libopenblas.so.0 -> usr/lib64/openblas-pthreads/libopenblas.so.0 The package libopenblas_pthreads0-0.3.21-3.1.x86_64.rpm misses that symlink. I did ln -s /usr/lib64/openblas-pthreads/libopenblas.so.0 /usr/lib64/libopenblas.so.0 and digikam is back to work. My system: Operating System: openSUSE Tumbleweed 20230213 KDE Plasma Version: 5.27.0 KDE Frameworks Version: 5.103.0 Qt Version: 5.15.8 Kernel Version: 6.1.10-1-default (64-bit) Graphics Platform: X11 Graphics Processor: Mesa Intel� HD Graphics 630 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248#c4 --- Comment #4 from Egbert Eich <eich@suse.com> --- # zypper in digikam ... hours later # ls /usr/lib64/libopenblas.so.0* -l lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 33 Feb 14 17:52 /usr/lib64/libopenblas.so.0 -> openblas-default/libopenblas.so.0 # file /usr/lib64/libopenblas.so.0* /usr/lib64/libopenblas.so.0: symbolic link to openblas-default/libopenblas.so.0 # file -L /usr/lib64/libopenblas.so.0* /usr/lib64/libopenblas.so.0: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, BuildID[sha1]=722a9adea5a73e98bfebbe0e1cd531794d40417f, stripped I've even tried updating from an older version that had a slightly different link: # ls -l /usr/lib64/libopenblas.so.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 58 Feb 14 19:13 /usr/lib64/libopenblas.so.0 -> /etc/alternatives/openblas-default_x86_64/libopenblas.so.0 # zypper update libopenblas_pthreads0' ... # ls -l /usr/lib64/libopenblas.so.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 33 Feb 14 19:19 /usr/lib64/libopenblas.so.0 -> openblas-default/libopenblas.so.0 The link is created in the %post script. So unless you are installing with --noscript for some reason, you should have this link. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248#c5 --- Comment #5 from Christophe Marin <christophe@krop.fr> --- If I try to force a reinstall using zypper, here's the output: # zypper in -f libopenblas_pthreads0 The following package is going to be reinstalled: libopenblas_pthreads0 1 package to reinstall. Overall download size: 5.0 MiB. Already cached: 0 B. No additional space will be used or freed after the operation. Continue? [y/n/v/...? shows all options] (y): Retrieving: libopenblas_pthreads0-0.3.21-3.1.x86_64 (openSUSE-Tumbleweed-Oss) (1/1), 5.0 MiB Retrieving: libopenblas_pthreads0-0.3.21-3.1.x86_64.rpm ........................................................................................................................................................................[done (5.0 MiB/s)] Verifying ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................[done] Preparing ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................[done] (1/1) Installing: libopenblas_pthreads0-0.3.21-3.1.x86_64 ..................................................................................................................................................................................[done] update-alternatives: error: alternative link /usr/lib64/openblas-default is already managed by openblas-default update-alternatives: error: alternative link /usr/lib64/libblas.so.3 is already managed by libblas.so.3 update-alternatives: error: alternative link /usr/lib64/libcblas.so.3 is already managed by libcblas.so.3 update-alternatives: error: alternative link /usr/lib64/liblapack.so.3 is already managed by liblapack.so.3 update-alternatives: error: alternative link /usr/lib64/liblapacke.so.3 is already managed by liblapacke.so.3 (1/1) Executing postin script for: libopenblas_pthreads0-0.3.21-3.1.x86_64 .................................................................................................................................................................[done] (1/1) Cleaning up: libopenblas_pthreads0-0.3.21-3.1.x86_64 .................................................................................................................................................................................[done] (1/1) Executing postun script for: libopenblas_pthreads0-0.3.21-3.1.x86_64 .................................................................................................................................................................[done] (1/1) Executing posttrans script for: libopenblas_pthreads0-0.3.21-3.1.x86_64 ..............................................................................................................................................................[done] # ls -l /usr/lib64/libopenblas.so.0 ls: cannot access '/usr/lib64/libopenblas.so.0': No such file or directory -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248#c6 --- Comment #6 from Christophe Marin <christophe@krop.fr> --- Also note the rpmlint errors for openblas:pthreads [ 1679s] libopenblas_pthreads0.x86_64: E: alternative-link-missing /etc/alternatives/openblas-default [ 1679s] libopenblas_pthreads0.x86_64: E: alternative-link-missing /etc/alternatives/${lib} [ 1679s] The file %{_sysconfdir}/alternatives/$(basename generic-name) is missing in [ 1679s] the file list. Mark it as %ghost and add it to the file list. [ 1679s] [ 1679s] libopenblas_pthreads0.x86_64: E: alternative-generic-name-not-symlink /usr/lib64/openblas-default [ 1679s] The update-alternative generic-name is not a symlink pointing to [ 1679s] %{_sysconfdir}/alternatives/$(basename generic-name). [ 1679s] [ 1679s] libopenblas_pthreads0.x86_64: E: alternative-generic-name-missing /usr/lib64/${lib} [ 1679s] The update-alternatives generic name is not in the filelist. Create it as a [ 1679s] symlink to %{_sysconfdir}/alternatives/$(basename generic-name) and add it to [ 1679s] the file list. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248#c7 Egbert Eich <eich@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |christophe@krop.fr Flags| |needinfo?(christophe@krop.f | |r) --- Comment #7 from Egbert Eich <eich@suse.com> --- The messages are generated as the check script is not able to correctly parse the post-install script. Do you have /usr/lib64/openblas-default - and if so, is it a link? What does it point to? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248#c8 Christophe Marin <christophe@krop.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(christophe@krop.f | |r) | --- Comment #8 from Christophe Marin <christophe@krop.fr> --- (In reply to Egbert Eich from comment #7)
Do you have /usr/lib64/openblas-default - and if so, is it a link? What does it point to?
No such file. /usr/lib64/openblas-pthreads/libopenblas.so.0 is the only file that exists. The other ones listed in comment #2 are all missing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248#c9 --- Comment #9 from Bit Juggler <suse.junky@t-online.de> --- (In reply to Egbert Eich from comment #4)
The link is created in the %post script. So unless you are installing with --noscript for some reason, you should have this link.
Yes, but that script changed. in libopenblas_pthreads0-0.3.21-2.1.x86_64.rpm: postinstall scriptlet (using /bin/sh): /usr/sbin/update-alternatives --install \ /usr/lib64/openblas-default openblas-default /usr/lib64/openblas-pthreads 50 for lib in libblas.so.3 libcblas.so.3 liblapack.so.3 liblapacke.so.3; do /usr/sbin/update-alternatives --install \ /usr/lib64/${lib} ${lib} /usr/lib64/libopenblas.so.0 20 done /sbin/ldconfig in libopenblas_pthreads0-0.3.21-3.1.x86_64.rpm: postinstall scriptlet (using /bin/sh): /usr/sbin/update-alternatives --install \ /usr/lib64/openblas-default openblas-default_x86_64 /usr/lib64/openblas-pthreads 50 # Cannot package this link - brp-25-symlink doesn't recognize links created by update-alternatives ln -sf openblas-default/libopenblas.so.0 /usr/lib64/libopenblas.so.0 for lib in libblas.so.3 libcblas.so.3 liblapack.so.3 liblapacke.so.3; do /usr/sbin/update-alternatives --install \ /usr/lib64/${lib} ${lib}_x86_64 /usr/lib64/openblas-pthreads/libopenblas.so.0 20 done /sbin/ldconfig I'm no expert in this but all over those scripts complete path names are used except for the line ln -sf openblas-default/libopenblas.so.0 /usr/lib64/libopenblas.so.0 May be this should be ln -sf /usr/lib64/openblas-pthreads/libopenblas.so.0 /usr/lib64/libopenblas.so.0 Or it is enough to use "openblas-pthreads" instead of "openblas-default". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248#c10 Egbert Eich <eich@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(christophe@krop.f | |r) --- Comment #10 from Egbert Eich <eich@suse.com> --- (In reply to Bit Juggler from comment #9)
I'm no expert in this but all over those scripts complete path names are used except for the line
ln -sf openblas-default/libopenblas.so.0 /usr/lib64/libopenblas.so.0
That's fine. That's a relative link - relative to the location of the link.
May be this should be
ln -sf /usr/lib64/openblas-pthreads/libopenblas.so.0 /usr/lib64/libopenblas.so.0
This would create an absolute link.
Or it is enough to use "openblas-pthreads" instead of "openblas-default".
Yes. @Christophe, Bitjuggler - could you do the following (in that order): get me the output of: ls -l /etc/alternatives/openblas-default* then try the following: for i in openblas-default libblas.so.3 libcblas.so.3 liblapack.so.3 liblapacke.so.3; do update-alternatives --remove-all $i done Then force-install the script again? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248#c11 --- Comment #11 from Bit Juggler <suse.junky@t-online.de> --- (In reply to Egbert Eich from comment #10)
@Christophe, Bitjuggler - could you do the following (in that order): get me the output of: ls -l /etc/alternatives/openblas-default*
# ls -l /etc/alternatives/openblas-default* ls: cannot access '/etc/alternatives/openblas-default*': No such file or directory #
then try the following: for i in openblas-default libblas.so.3 libcblas.so.3 liblapack.so.3 liblapacke.so.3; do update-alternatives --remove-all $i done
# for i in openblas-default libblas.so.3 libcblas.so.3 liblapack.so.3 liblapacke.so.3; do
update-alternatives --remove-all $i done update-alternatives: warning: alternative /usr/lib64/libopenblas_pthreads.so.0 (part of link group libblas.so.3) doesn't exist; removing from list of alternatives update-alternatives: warning: alternative /usr/lib64/libopenblas_pthreads.so.0 (part of link group libcblas.so.3) doesn't exist; removing from list of alternatives update-alternatives: warning: alternative /usr/lib64/libopenblas_pthreads.so.0 (part of link group liblapack.so.3) doesn't exist; removing from list of alternatives
Then force-install the script again?
I'm not quite sure what you want me to do here. Should I zypper in -f libopenblas_pthreads0-0.3.21-3.1.x86_64.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248#c12 Christophe Marin <christophe@krop.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(christophe@krop.f | |r) | --- Comment #12 from Christophe Marin <christophe@krop.fr> --- Same result. After another forced installation, the symlinks are there. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248#c13 Bit Juggler <suse.junky@t-online.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo? --- Comment #13 from Bit Juggler <suse.junky@t-online.de> --- (In reply to Christophe Marin from comment #12)
After another forced installation, the symlinks are there.
Same here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248#c14 Egbert Eich <eich@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo? | --- Comment #14 from Egbert Eich <eich@suse.com> --- Right. Meanwhile I found it. The old (non-arch) update alternatives need to we wiped before new (arch-dependent) links can be set up for the same path. This cases the link that's created by ln -sf openblas-default/libopenblas.so.0 /usr/lib64/libopenblas.so.0 to be dangling. The ldconfig at the end of the script takes care of this and wipes it. I'm presently preparing fix. I will test it before submitting. I've set up everything so I can test if this works. Thanks for your help! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248 Gerhard Stengel <gstengel@gmx.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gstengel@gmx.net -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248 Scott Bradnick <scott.bradnick@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |scott.bradnick@suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248 Nikita Beloglazov <nnikita.beloglazov@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nnikita.beloglazov@gmail.co | |m -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248#c15 --- Comment #15 from hui <sturm-fr@web.de> --- *** Bug 1208334 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248 Christophe Marin <christophe@krop.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|christophe@krop.fr | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248#c16 --- Comment #16 from OBSbugzilla Bot <bwiedemann+obsbugzillabot@suse.com> --- This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration: This bug (1208248) was mentioned in https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1066237 Factory / openblas -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248#c17 Christophe Marin <christophe@krop.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jdd@dodin.org --- Comment #17 from Christophe Marin <christophe@krop.fr> --- *** Bug 1208416 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248#c18 Paul Tannington <paul.pgp-7@gmx.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul.pgp-7@gmx.com --- Comment #18 from Paul Tannington <paul.pgp-7@gmx.com> --- I may be mistaken, but the changelog a appears to indicate a fix: - Fix a fallout of making alternatives directory arch dependent. - Remove unneeded links that will be created by update-alternatives. Create remaining links %post scripts properly %ghost-ing the files. However, this still appears to be an issue, zypper dup to 20230216 throws these errors: # 2023-02-18 09:01:28 libopenblas_pthreads0-0.3.21-3.1.x86_64.rpm installed ok # Additional rpm output: # update-alternatives: error: alternative link /usr/lib64/openblas-default is already managed by openblas-default # update-alternatives: error: alternative link /usr/lib64/libblas.so.3 is already managed by libblas.so.3 # update-alternatives: error: alternative link /usr/lib64/libcblas.so.3 is already managed by libcblas.so.3 # update-alternatives: error: alternative link /usr/lib64/liblapack.so.3 is already managed by liblapack.so.3 # update-alternatives: error: alternative link /usr/lib64/liblapacke.so.3 is already managed by liblapacke.so.3 # and digikam still fails to load: digikam: error while loading shared libraries: libopenblas.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248#c19 --- Comment #19 from Christophe Marin <christophe@krop.fr> --- (In reply to Paul Tannington from comment #18)
I may be mistaken, but the changelog a appears to indicate a fix:
However, this still appears to be an issue, zypper dup to 20230216 throws these errors:
The request wasn't accepted yet: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1066237 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248#c20 --- Comment #20 from Paul Tannington <paul.pgp-7@gmx.com> --- (In reply to Christophe Marin from comment #19)
(In reply to Paul Tannington from comment #18)
The request wasn't accepted yet: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1066237
Ah... OK, my bad, apologies. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248#c21 --- Comment #21 from OBSbugzilla Bot <bwiedemann+obsbugzillabot@suse.com> --- This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration: This bug (1208248) was mentioned in https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1066744 Factory / openblas -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248#c23 Stephan van den Akker <stephanv778@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |stephanv778@gmail.com --- Comment #23 from Stephan van den Akker <stephanv778@gmail.com> --- I am having the same problem with digikam. Missing links in /usr/lib64 prevent digikam (and qgis) from running. This problem extends to libblas, libcblas, libopenblas and liblapack. Manually creating links to libraries present in /usr/lib64/blas /usr/lib64/lapack /usr/lib64/openblas-pthreads seems to solve the problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248 Marius Kittler <marius.kittler@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |marius.kittler@suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1208248 Guillaume GARDET <guillaume.gardet@arm.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |guillaume.gardet@arm.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply@suse.com