[Bug 567336] New: Wodim does not properly recognize DVDR drive write speeds on NEC ND-3550A
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567336 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567336#c0 Summary: Wodim does not properly recognize DVDR drive write speeds on NEC ND-3550A Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.2 Version: Final Platform: i686 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.2 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening@forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: rodschaffter@gmail.com QAContact: qa@suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created an attachment (id=334315) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=334315) console output of wodim -prcap dev=/dev/sr0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.6) Gecko/20091201 SUSE/3.5.6-1.1.1 Firefox/3.5.6 When burning a DVDR project with K3b to Verbatim 16x DVD+R media, it notes that it cannot burn the DVD at 16x, saying "Medium or burner does not support burning at 16x speed/Switchign burn speedto 6x" and burns it at 6x speed. K3b apparently recognizes that it is a 16x disk, as 16x speed is offered as an option. Burning DVDs with k3b under openSUSE 11.0 (installed on this machine in a separate partition accessed via GRUB) is successful at 16x. The output of wodim -prcap dev=/dev/sr0 indicates that the top DVD write speed of this drive is 6x, which is incorrect. Console output is attached Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Burn a DVD using K3b using either speed set to 'Auto' or '16x' Actual Results: Burns DVD at 6x Expected Results: Should have burned at 16x -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567336
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567336#c
yang xiaoyu
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567336
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567336#c1
Jörg Schiling
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567336
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567336#c2
--- Comment #2 from Rod Schaffter
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567336
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567336#c3
--- Comment #3 from Rod Schaffter
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567336
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567336#c
Rod Schaffter
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567336
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567336#c4
--- Comment #4 from Jörg Schiling
I of course used wodim because that is what was included in the 11.2 distribution. I removed wodim, and the cdrkit-cdrtools compatibility package, and installed cdrecord and mkisofs from the Factory:Base repository.
The console output of cdrecord -prcap dev=/dev/sr0 incorrectly indicates that the top DVD write speed of this drive is 6x, as did wodim. However, K3b WOULD write a disk at 16x, averaging 12.6x for the test disk I burned, so in that regard, the substitution of cdrecord/mkisofs for wodim was a success.
It seems that you are missinterpreting the output from cdrecord. Cdrecord typically just outputs the information provided by the drive. Cdrecord just knows a lot about bugs in the drive's firmware and how to circumvent related problems. If you like to get information for a specific medium, you of course need to _insert_ this medium first _before_ you call cdrecord. You did not do this, but rather did run cdrecord with an empty tray, so you cannot expect information that is related to a medium..... Didn't you wonder why the drive reported you a max. speed of 8467x when looking at the output? Now back to your drive: it is well known that this drive has firmware bugs and always returns CD related values in the MMC-2 part of the reply although with MMC-2, the DVD media type was introduced into the standard. If you like to discuss the problem, you of course first need to insert _exactly_ the medium, you are interested in. Then have a close look at the get performance values...... Some drives (e.g. Pioneer still will not return useful values here. Now back to k3b: I recommend you to make a bug report against k3b as k3b does not use cdrecord to ask for the possible write speed. Instead, k3b tries to send SCSI commands itself (which is introducing a security problem as k3b is a GUI that cannot be audited for security). The important problem with k3b however is that it does not have the needed knowledge about the drives and it's firmware bugs, so k3b is expected to give wrong results as long as it is not converted to rather ask cdrecord for the needed parameters. I recommend you to run: cdrecord -vv -checkdrive to get the max. write speed for a specific medium, as the related output is not what the drive tells you directly but instead a firmware bug workaround is used in this case. BTW: From reading my statements, you may understand why it is of course a bad idea to use old versions of cdrecord (older than the drive) or completely unmaintained software like wodim. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567336
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567336#c5
Dean Hilkewich
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567336
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567336#c6
--- Comment #6 from Jörg Schiling
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567336
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567336#c7
--- Comment #7 from Dean Hilkewich
You don't need to use closed source software in order to get decent behavior.....
The original cdrtools (even available as binary packet via SuSE) also has no problem to write at the maximum supported speed because cdrtools is well maintained software.
Jorg, no offence, but I am not reporting on a bug against the original cdrtools so kindly butt out and worry about your project that you manage and keep your trolling out of bug reports. If you want to campaign for original cdrtools inclusion then I suggest opening up a openFATE request. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567336
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567336#c8
--- Comment #8 from Jörg Schiling
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567336
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567336#c9
--- Comment #9 from Dean Hilkewich
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567336
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567336#c10
--- Comment #10 from Jörg Schiling
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567336
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567336#c11
--- Comment #11 from Dean Hilkewich
I am sorry to see that you made your bug report not in hope for a fix but rather in order to play political games against OpenSource software.
Have a nice day and have fun with your bugs.
I could care less if it was opensource, closed source, or created by a Mayan deity. Most end users care about something just working. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567336
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567336#c12
--- Comment #12 from Rod Schaffter
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com