[Bug 827526] New: "firewire ERR: Incompatible libffado version! (libffado 2.1.0-)" when launching "jackd -dfirewire"
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827526 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827526#c0 Summary: "firewire ERR: Incompatible libffado version! (libffado 2.1.0-)" when launching "jackd -dfirewire" Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 12.3 Version: Final Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: openSUSE 12.3 Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Sound AssignedTo: tiwai@suse.com ReportedBy: lpgasparotto@gmail.com QAContact: qa-bugs@suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux x86_64) Presto/2.12.388 Version/12.14 When launching "jackd -dfirewire" I get this output: jackdmp 1.9.8 Copyright 2001-2005 Paul Davis and others. Copyright 2004-2011 Grame. jackdmp comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; see the file COPYING for details no message buffer overruns no message buffer overruns no message buffer overruns JACK server starting in realtime mode with priority 10 firewire ERR: Incompatible libffado version! (libffado 2.1.0-) Cannot initialize driver JackServer::Open() failed with -1 no message buffer overruns Failed to open server It's impossible to launch Jack server due this issue. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Plug your firewire audio device (jackd and ffado should be previously installed) 2.Open a terminal and type "jackd -dfirewire" 3. Actual Results: jackdmp 1.9.8 Copyright 2001-2005 Paul Davis and others. Copyright 2004-2011 Grame. jackdmp comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; see the file COPYING for details no message buffer overruns no message buffer overruns no message buffer overruns JACK server starting in realtime mode with priority 10 firewire ERR: Incompatible libffado version! (libffado 2.1.0-) Cannot initialize driver JackServer::Open() failed with -1 no message buffer overruns Failed to open server Expected Results: Jack server should start and give information about the plugged firewire device. The version of jack in openSUSE 12.3 has this line: #define FIREWIRE_REQUIRED_FFADO_API_VERSION 8 and requires exactly this version. But ffado-2.1.0 has FFADO_API_VERSION of 9 There's a patched version at this repository: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/wolfi323:/branches:/openSUSE... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827526 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827526#c1 --- Comment #1 from Wolfgang Bauer <wbauer@tmo.at> 2013-06-30 20:03:46 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=546260) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=546260) Patch for jack to accept libffado 2.1.0 I have attached the patch from my jack packages mentioned in comment#0. According to the bug reporter, those packages work fine with libffado 2.1.0 from openSUSE 12.3. If wanted, I would take care of an online update for 12.3... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827526 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827526#c2 Wolfgang Bauer <wbauer@tmo.at> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wbauer@tmo.at --- Comment #2 from Wolfgang Bauer <wbauer@tmo.at> 2013-06-30 20:09:48 UTC --- I'd also like to mention that only openSUSE 12.3 is affected by this. jack 1.9.9.5 in multimedia:libs and factory already supports libffado-2.1.0. And 12.2 shipped with libffado-2.0.1, so the problem doesn't exist there either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827526 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827526#c3 Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO InfoProvider| |davejplater@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com> 2013-07-01 07:50:45 UTC --- Dave, could you work on this? If the patch isn't good (e.g. jack-1.9.8 is known to be broken with libffado 2.1.0) and if there is no regression (ABI change or whatever), it'd be OK to upgrade for 1.9.9.5 for 12.3, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827526 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827526#c4 Dave Plater <davejplater@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW CC| |davejplater@gmail.com InfoProvider|davejplater@gmail.com | --- Comment #4 from Dave Plater <davejplater@gmail.com> 2013-07-02 05:35:55 UTC --- My computer is currently awaiting a power supply so perhaps Wolfgang can handle the jack update for 12.3? The update to 1.9.9.5 for 12.3 jack appears to be the best option. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827526 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827526#c5 Wolfgang Bauer <wbauer@tmo.at> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO InfoProvider| |maintenance@opensuse.org --- Comment #5 from Wolfgang Bauer <wbauer@tmo.at> 2013-07-02 09:09:49 UTC --- So the consensus is to release jack 1.9.9.5 as online update for 12.3? I can prepare that. Mr Maintenance: Is this ok? Can I create a maintanence request for 12.3 with jack 1.9.9.5 from multimedia:libs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827526 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827526#c6 --- Comment #6 from Wolfgang Bauer <wbauer@tmo.at> 2013-07-02 09:21:10 UTC --- And I just saw this was already reported in bnc#801442... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827526 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827526#c7 Marcus Meissner <meissner@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW CC| |meissner@suse.com InfoProvider|maintenance@opensuse.org | --- Comment #7 from Marcus Meissner <meissner@suse.com> 2013-07-04 06:00:49 UTC --- how much difference is there? is it fully plugin compatible? if yes, just file a maintenancerequest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827526 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827526#c8 Wolfgang Bauer <wbauer@tmo.at> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO InfoProvider| |maintenance@opensuse.org --- Comment #8 from Wolfgang Bauer <wbauer@tmo.at> 2013-07-04 09:05:16 UTC --- Sorry, I have no idea. Dave Plater suggested the update to 1.9.9.5 would be the best option. But the changelog is quite long: https://build.opensuse.org/patchinfo/show?package=patchinfo&project=home%3Awolfi323%3Abranches%3Amultimedia%3Alibs I could also just submit my package with the patch attached in comment#1. That patch just alters that version check. According to the reporter this works fine (can't test myself as I have no firewire devices). And I think that's safe to do anyway since it only affects the ffado-plugin. So even if there should be a problem, it can't be worse than now (i.e. the ffado-plugin is not working at all). So which one should I submit? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827526 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827526#c9 Benjamin Brunner <bbrunner@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW InfoProvider|maintenance@opensuse.org | --- Comment #9 from Benjamin Brunner <bbrunner@suse.com> 2013-07-08 11:20:21 CEST --- Let's give it a try with the 1.9.9.5 package and test it in the test-channel. Wolfgang could you open a maintenancerequest with the updated package, please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827526 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827526#c10 --- Comment #10 from Wolfgang Bauer <wbauer@tmo.at> 2013-07-08 10:33:09 UTC --- Well, 1.9.9 and 1.9.8 should be API compatible. From http://jackaudio.org/: JACK 1.9.9 released Submitted by letz on Mon, 2012-12-10 12:34 Jack 1.9.9 is API compatible with latest Jack 0.121.3 version. JACK 1.9.8 released Submitted by letz on Mon, 2011-12-19 14:45 Jack 1.9.8 is API compatible with latest Jack 0.121.3 version. Created MR#182481. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827526 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827526#c11 --- Comment #11 from Bernhard Wiedemann <bwiedemann@suse.com> 2013-07-08 13:00:21 CEST --- This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration: This bug (827526) was mentioned in https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/182481 Maintenance / -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827526 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827526#c12 --- Comment #12 from Bernhard Wiedemann <bwiedemann@suse.com> 2013-07-08 14:00:09 CEST --- This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration: This bug (827526) was mentioned in https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/182485 Maintenance / https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/182486 Maintenance / -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827526 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827526#c13 Benjamin Brunner <bbrunner@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #13 from Benjamin Brunner <bbrunner@suse.com> 2013-07-15 14:12:20 CEST --- Update released for openSUSE 12.3. Resolved fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827526 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827526#c14 --- Comment #14 from Swamp Workflow Management <swamp@suse.de> 2013-07-15 13:04:31 UTC --- openSUSE-RU-2013:1198-1: An update that has two recommended fixes can now be installed. Category: recommended (low) Bug References: 801442,827526 CVE References: Sources used: openSUSE 12.3 (src): jack-1.9.9.5-8.4.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com