[Bug 690038] New: Packages loose their marking as "do not change"
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038#c0 Summary: Packages loose their marking as "do not change" Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.4 Version: Factory Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: YaST2 AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening@forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: dieter.jurzitza@t-online.de QAContact: jsrain@novell.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:2.0.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0 I repetitively stumble across the fact that Yast is loosing the attributes of "don't change" files either due to package kit or due to a timeout. The current mgetty / sendfax distribution is buggy (bug report exists) Hence I installed a fixed version - somewhat older than the recend one and marked it as "do not change". This always ensured that the packages were kept as long as I did not intentionally change the attribute. However, since openSUSE 11.4 the attribute "don't change" (Geschützt - nicht verändern) get's lost -the heck knows why this happens. So I cannot tell an unexperienced user to upgrade - because the upgrade potentionally destroys a running system. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Mark a package as "Geschützt - nicht verändern") 2. wait (a day, a week, don't know how long 3. Marking is gone!!!!! Actual Results: Well, the mark as "Geschützt" is vanishing into the haze after some time - don't know what causes this behaviour! Expected Results: Guess what :-) If I intentionally mark software as _dont_change_this_ I would expect the updater to respect my decision. I have my reasons!!!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038#c1
--- Comment #1 from Dieter Jurzitza
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038#c2
--- Comment #2 from Dieter Jurzitza
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038#c
zj jia
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038#c3
Thomas Göttlicher
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038#c4
Michael Andres
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038#c
Michael Andres
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038#c5
--- Comment #5 from Dieter Jurzitza
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038#c6
Dieter Jurzitza
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038#c7
Bjørn Lie
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038#c8
Bjørn Lie
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038#c9
Bjørn Lie
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038#c10
Michael Andres
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038#c11
Michael Andres
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038#c
Michael Andres
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038#c12
--- Comment #12 from Michael Andres
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038#c13
Duncan Mac-Vicar
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038#c14
--- Comment #14 from Dieter Jurzitza
I am lowering the severity, as it is not straightforward to reproduce. You need to get the requires of a locked package and then do another operation to get the reset lock commited.
is kind of strange. As an administrator I am urged now to live with kpackagekit, and everyone knows that defective packages hang around all the time. And if you argue that an effect that happens _immediately_ and _always_ when using the services of kpackagekit you're urged to use as the former yast frontend for updates does not exist any more is not straightforwad to reproduce, hmm, then, please tell me what would be straightforward in your opinion? It is 100% reproducible ..... ;-) Don't get me wrong, I am glad you fix this, but I cannot agree with your points. This bug is severe IMHO because it touches the basics of system administration. If I have to tell people don't use this service because it definitively destroys functionalities (talking about the defective package of mgetty that is being distributed) then it is serious. At least much more serious than a simple broken feature of a non-system relevant program. Thank you anyway for fixing this quickly, take care Dieter Jurzitza -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038#c15
--- Comment #15 from Duncan Mac-Vicar
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038#c16
Duncan Mac-Vicar
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038#c17
Marcus Meissner
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038#c18
Christian Dengler
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038#c19
Duncan Mac-Vicar
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038#c20
--- Comment #20 from Bernhard Wiedemann
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038#c21
--- Comment #21 from Marcus Meissner
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038#c
Christian Dengler
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038#c22
--- Comment #22 from Dieter Jurzitza
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038#c23
--- Comment #23 from Duncan Mac-Vicar
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038#c24
john andersen
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038#c27
Swamp Workflow Management
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038#c28
Duncan Mac-Vicar
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038#c29
--- Comment #29 from Bernhard Wiedemann
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690038#c30
Michael Andres
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com