[Bug 931165] "Predictable Network Interface Names" workaround(s) stopped working
![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/3035b38ff33cf86f480bb169b8500b80.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=931165
--- Comment #10 from Dr. Werner Fink
And that will be when? I suppose at SLE13GA time - the perfect time to sell net.ifnames=0 in the release notes. Or if you really really want to stay, there's always Base:System:Legacy/systemd. The reason why B:S:L exists is precisely because you want to keep some prior version or extra patches.
The customer wish is what matters.
So, on your Factory test system, which lines of enable_name_policy() get executed?
I can swtich for and back (after removing /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules) and on openSUSE the part with -DNET_IFNAMES=0 is valid (the second part with ``predictable'' rules): static bool enable_name_policy(void) { [...] #if defined(NET_IFNAMES) && (NET_IFNAMES == 1) # warning Using persistent rules as a default if (r <= 0) return false; FOREACH_WORD_QUOTED(w, l, line, state) if (strneq(w, "net.ifnames=1", l)) return true; return false; #else # warning Using predictable rules as a default if (r <= 0) return true; FOREACH_WORD_QUOTED(w, l, line, state) if (strneq(w, "net.ifnames=0", l)) return false; return true; #endif } -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com