rpm -qp --requires /work/CDs/all/full-head-x86_64/suse/src/gcc7.spm warning: /work/CDs/all/full-head-x86_64/suse/src/gcc7.spm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 39db7c82: NOKEY bison flex gcc-ada gcc-c++ gettext-devel glibc-32bit glibc-devel-32bit isl-devel makeinfo mpc-devel mpfr-devel

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=795594 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=795594#c4 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mls@suse.com Flags| |needinfo?(coolo@suse.com) --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Not sure why this is back on my plate. The same issue exists in any package BuildRequiring glibc-devel-32bit. gcc7.spm shows: perl rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 zlib-devel similar for spms of dynamips, firescope, grub, grub2, lilo, lsb, memtest86+, papi, trustedgrub, valgrind and xen. Either this isn't considered a bug and thus lets close it as WONTFIX or we need to provide a more proper way of build requiring 32bit/64bit glibc where available rather than relying on the projconf magic. That more proper way needs to deal with the fact that we share spms across all archs (so more packages might be affected if they have architecture specific BuildRequires). Coolo, please either close as WONTFIX or bounce to whatever people responsible for designing something that works for architecture specific BuildRequires in spms. Suggestion: BuildRequires: x86_64(glibc-devel-32bit) BuildRequires: ppc(glibc-devel-64bit) etc. This was on mls plate because it's really also a question for RPM upstream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.