[Bug 1043401] New: create repository form crypto currencies
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401 Bug ID: 1043401 Summary: create repository form crypto currencies Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE.org Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Enhancement Priority: P5 - None Component: BuildService Assignee: adrian@suse.com Reporter: sbrabec@suse.com QA Contact: adrian@suse.com CC: marec@detebe.org Found By: --- Blocker: --- Crypto currencies became very popular in recent time. Looking at the openSUSE Build Service, only a very limited set of packages is present in projects and openSUSE itself. But Markus Reckwerth (marec2000) maintains a large set of these packages in https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:marec2000:cryptocoins I would like to propose: - Create a dedicated repository for crypto currencies. I can imagine name "coins", "cryptocoins", "cryptocurrencies", or eventually more generic repository "crypto" or "cryptography". - Move home:marec2000:cryptocoins there. - Move devel project of network/bitcoin (and eventually other packages) there. It will get more popularity for this repo and also allow to get all these packages directly to the openSUSE distribution. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401#c1
Adrian Schröter
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401#c2
Stanislav Brabec
From my point of view it depends on what is expected from such a cryptocoin
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401#c3
Markus Reckwerth
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401#c4
Richard Bos
From my own creation I would propose: cryptocurrencies
To add one: wallets, cryptowallets But I agree it would be nice to give crypto wallets and miners their own repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401#c5
Adrian Schröter
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401#c6
--- Comment #6 from Stanislav Brabec
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401#c7
--- Comment #7 from Stanislav Brabec
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401#c8
Stanislav Brabec
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401#c15
--- Comment #15 from Markus Reckwerth
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401#c19
--- Comment #19 from Markus Reckwerth
I just disabled conflicting non-coin packages for openSUSE_Tumbleweed.
hidapi libargtable2 libdb-5_1 libdb-5_3 peerunity uthash
Let's see what happens and whether Factory packages are sufficient.
I also did a search for packages with _link. There is only additional one that points outside:
libdb-6_2: It is derived from devel:libraries:c_c++ libdb_6.0 I left enabled it, as it is unique here.
The libdb-5_* packages aren't yet available in Factory. There are packages in network and devel:languages:c_c++ but they haven't made it's way into Factory. Therefore I will re-enable those for Tumbleweed. Regarding peerunity - there is a package in network but also not in Factory. So someone has to decide which to maintain. The other mentioned packages I removed few weeks ago. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401#c22
Markus Reckwerth
Looking at peerunity, it is a Peercoin client. So it should logically belong to network:cryptocurrencies.
network is a current peerunity devel project in Factory. So it would be nice to move/merge peerunity from network to network:cryptocurrencies, and then change Factory devel project.
Maintainer is Victor Pereira.
Same with dogecoin (-> Jimmy Berry) and namecoin (-> w/o maintainer), although those are not devel projects for Factory. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401#c23
Victor Pereira
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401#c24
--- Comment #24 from Martin Pluskal
Hi, I work together with the core developers from peercoin and actually we merged it back into the qt client (after 0.6.x) so we can drop peerunity. I will then submit, the "new" qt client for that. What should be my actions here?
I want to:
- drop peerunity - submit peercoin qt-client
Either send sr and deleterequest or do it all yourselv - you are now maintainer of project as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401#c25
--- Comment #25 from Markus Reckwerth
Hi, I work together with the core developers from peercoin and actually we merged it back into the qt client (after 0.6.x) so we can drop peerunity. I will then submit, the "new" qt client for that. What should be my actions here?
I want to:
- drop peerunity - submit peercoin qt-client
Have a look at package ppcoin, which contains current peercoin client (0.6.0).You might want to update/replace it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401#c26
Markus Reckwerth
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401#c27
--- Comment #27 from Jimmy Berry
Same with dogecoin (-> Jimmy Berry) and namecoin (-> w/o maintainer), although those are not devel projects for Factory.
I heavily refactored the bitcoin spec to allow for using same spec for dogecoin. Not sure if the "new" dogecoin package utilizes it, but would seem rather silly not to and I would not appreciate dropping the .changes entries. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401#c28
--- Comment #28 from Jimmy Berry
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401#c29
Markus Reckwerth
(In reply to Markus Reckwerth from comment #22)
Same with dogecoin (-> Jimmy Berry) and namecoin (-> w/o maintainer), although those are not devel projects for Factory.
I heavily refactored the bitcoin spec to allow for using same spec for dogecoin. Not sure if the "new" dogecoin package utilizes it, but would seem rather silly not to and I would not appreciate dropping the .changes entries.
I think first step should be to put all cryptocoin packages together into the network:cryptocurrencies repository and then working on moving dependencies out of it. So a simple copypac does preserve all files. The current dogecoin spec in network:cryptocurrencies is an old one, based on latest release in 2016. Development upstream has been stuck for some time. Is there any reason that prevents 2 or more instances of libdb to live together in factory? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401#c31
--- Comment #31 from Markus Reckwerth
removed namecoin from network.
the spec file of it network:cryptocurrencies looks bloated , but I leave that to you.
have updated namecoin in network:cryptocurrencies to latest upstream version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401#c33
--- Comment #33 from Stanislav Brabec
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401#c35
--- Comment #35 from Markus Reckwerth
I think first step should be to put all cryptocoin packages together into the network:cryptocurrencies repository and then working on moving dependencies out of it.
If this were the case then I would expect a copy of the one already in network. Especially that you are proposal removal of that package the spec would be lost. Secondly I would expect to be added as a maintainer in the new location. I believe I was on bitcoin as well, but that has since been removed.
It seems this was done backwards as everything was taken from a home repository instead of the already "closer to official" devel project packages not to mention carry over maintainers. I am for such efforts, but they should be done properly.
One could then make SRs for changes to spec.
Is there any reason that prevents 2 or more instances of libdb to live together in factory?
No reason as long as they are packaged to allow it. If referencing my comments about dogecoin requiring a different version and not being in Factory that was due to no maintainer for it.
added you as maintainer to network:cryptocurrencies -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401#c37
Marketa Calabkova
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401#c38
--- Comment #38 from Markus Reckwerth
What is the progress here? Both Stanislav's requests were declined, so peerunity and dogecoin are still missing in network:cryptocurrencies. Do we still want to move these packages there? If yes, it would be best if maintainers of these packages moved them.
peerunity probabely should be removed entirely as upstream development has been terminated and code is no longer compatible with the peercoin blockchain. one should use peercoin instead. Anyway, as you mentioned there is nothing going on for a while here and both packages are currently only available for leap 42.3 I would opt for erasing them in network and providing replacements in network:cryptocurrencies. I can take care of this, i.e. moving in dogecoin and peercoin. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
peerunity probabely should be removed entirely as upstream development has been terminated and code is no longer compatible with the peercoin blockchain. one should use peercoin instead. OK. Could you please ping the right people to get it done, please?
Anyway, as you mentioned there is nothing going on for a while here and both packages are currently only available for leap 42.3 I would opt for erasing them in network and providing replacements in network:cryptocurrencies. I can take care of this, i.e. moving in dogecoin and peercoin. Personally I like this solution. It would be very nice of you, thank you. If nobody else answers I guess you can just try it and see how the maintainers
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401#c39
--- Comment #39 from Marketa Calabkova
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401#c40
--- Comment #40 from Markus Reckwerth
(In reply to Markus Reckwerth from comment #38)
peerunity probabely should be removed entirely as upstream development has been terminated and code is no longer compatible with the peercoin blockchain. one should use peercoin instead. OK. Could you please ping the right people to get it done, please?
I triggered delete requests for both, peerunity and dogecoin. https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/682609 https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/682610
Anyway, as you mentioned there is nothing going on for a while here and both packages are currently only available for leap 42.3 I would opt for erasing them in network and providing replacements in network:cryptocurrencies. I can take care of this, i.e. moving in dogecoin and peercoin.
Personally I like this solution. It would be very nice of you, thank you. If nobody else answers I guess you can just try it and see how the maintainers like it :) .
And I added packages for dogecoin and peercoin to repo. https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/network:cryptocurrencies/peercoin https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/network:cryptocurrencies/dogecoin Everything will be fine when delete requests above got accepted. :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043401#c41
--- Comment #41 from Jimmy Berry
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com