http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141105 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141105#c14 --- Comment #14 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jörg Schiling from comment #10)

(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #9)

...

That is still under investigation and since we don't have a reasonable test-case, we can't prove that.

Well you have a test case. mkisofs can be used as a test case, but I guess that any three liner that calls error() is sufficient. You already have a 100% prove for my statements in the two bug reports with the same signature of problems.

I'm asking you here for a reasonable small test-case. To be honest, the build system of schily is complicated and I one can't report such a huge project as a reproducer. That's why I asked you for a reproducer. ...

You are wrong, these functions have different prototypes and mkisofs

From the linker perspective, the resolution can be fulfilled by any of the shared libraries. Yes, the order of shared libraries should be probably followed, but it seems to me that providing a clashing functions by multiple

libraries is unhappy. Maybe your signature is the right from 1980s perspective, but glibc's is much more standard from today's perspective. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.