http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1188839 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1188839#c1 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|screening-team-bugs@suse.de |matz@suse.com --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- That's already (mostly?) achieved via ExclusiveArch settings in cross.spec.in which get the target arch pruned in change_spec. For example cross-ppc64le-gcc11.spec ends up with %if 0%{?gcc_icecream:1} ExclusiveArch: ppc64 x86_64 s390x aarch64 riscv64 %endif and thus is not build on ppc64le. So which packages are you specifically complaining about? I see there's explicit cross-aarch64-gcc11-bootstrap added in change_spec with gcc_libc_bootstrap, that path seems to lack the ExclusiveArch list (formerly only exercised for non-hosted targets). Micha? You added this it seems. Not sure why arm-none shouldn't be enabled for armv6/7 hosts though. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1188839 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1188839#c4 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Guillaume GARDET from comment #2)

ExclusiveArch is handled for cross-*-gcc11 but not for the -bootstrap flavor cross-*-gcc11-bootstrap.

cross-arm-none-gcc11* is unresolvable due to: nothing provides cross-arm-binutils nothing provides cross-arm-none-newlib-devel So, we would need to build cross-arm-binutils for armv6/7.

Supposedly the native binutils will do there, so the BuildRequires could be guarded with %ifnarch %{binutils_target} or sth like that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1188839 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1188839#c7 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Michael Matz from comment #6)

(In reply to Guillaume GARDET from comment #5)

...

(In reply to Michael Matz from comment #3)

...

I'd rather find a way that would say "DontBuildOn: XXX".

You are looking for 'ExcludeArch:' then. It means build for all architectures except on the one(s) listed here.

Uhm, right. I wonder why we aren't using it already, is it only supported with "newer" rpm, or were we just not knowing ExcludeArch: 18 years ago? ;-)

IIRC it was unsupported on SLE-11. But binutils uses it now so I guess it's fine to use. Maybe it doesn't combine with ExclusiveArch:, who knows (and we don't want to build crosses on all "hosts" - well, we did so in the past).

FWIW I was just playing with

%ifarch XXX ExclusiveArch: dontbuild %endif

which works as well, but of course ExcludeArch is nicer.

-- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1188839 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1188839#c9 Guillaume GARDET changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #9 from Guillaume GARDET --- This is fixed in Factory. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.