[Bug 504769] New: nondevel packages contain devel libraries
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504769 User behlert@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504769#c450061 Summary: nondevel packages contain devel libraries Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.2 Version: Alpha 0 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Minor Priority: P5 - None Component: Other AssignedTo: puzel@novell.com ReportedBy: behlert@novell.com QAContact: qa@suse.de CC: hare@novell.com, behlert@novell.com, coolo@novell.com, meissner@novell.com, nadvornik@novell.com, postadal@novell.com, ro@novell.com, seife@novell.com, kde-maintainers@suse.de, jmatejek@novell.com, dmueller@novell.com, hschaa@novell.com, jkupec@novell.com, prusnak@novell.com, nangelov@novell.com, crrodriguez@novell.com, puzel@novell.com Depends on: 450061 Found By: --- +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #450061 +++ The following package contains files that may be better put into a -devel package. Please evaluate: pth-2.0.7-102.22 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504769 Petr Uzel <puzel@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P5 - None |P4 - Low Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504769 User puzel@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504769#c1 Petr Uzel <puzel@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Petr Uzel <puzel@novell.com> 2009-06-02 08:55:47 MDT --- pth is split to libpth20 and pth-devel -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504769 User prusnak@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504769#c2 --- Comment #2 from Pavol Rusnak <prusnak@novell.com> 2009-06-02 09:00:24 MDT --- It should be libpth-devel, not pth-devel ... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504769 User puzel@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504769#c3 --- Comment #3 from Petr Uzel <puzel@novell.com> 2009-06-02 09:09:07 MDT --- I had a discussion about this with darix and his suggestion was pth-devel. Why do you think pth-devel is wrong? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504769 User prusnak@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504769#c4 Pavol Rusnak <prusnak@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mrueckert@novell.com --- Comment #4 from Pavol Rusnak <prusnak@novell.com> 2009-06-02 09:15:55 MDT --- I understood from the following document that packages containing devel files for certain library should have name in form libfoo-devel, not foo-devel. http://en.opensuse.org/Packaging/Shared_Libraries -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504769 User puzel@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504769#c5 --- Comment #5 from Petr Uzel <puzel@novell.com> 2009-06-03 02:34:12 MDT --- Even when the name of upstream package is just pth (not libpth)? There are more such packages: gmime, boost, ... If you still think it is wrong, please reopen this bug. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504769 User dmueller@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504769#c6 Dirk Mueller <dmueller@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | --- Comment #6 from Dirk Mueller <dmueller@novell.com> 2009-06-03 12:38:46 MDT --- I think for shared libraries we prefer to follow the shared library policy naming: http://en.opensuse.org/Packaging/Shared_Library_Packaging_Policy -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504769 User prusnak@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504769#c7 --- Comment #7 from Pavol Rusnak <prusnak@novell.com> 2009-06-03 12:43:26 MDT --- Dirk: that's the exact link I posted :-) The problem is that the policy does not specify clearly enough whether the "lib" should be used in the names of -devel packages (regardless of the upstream name). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504769 User dmueller@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504769#c8 --- Comment #8 from Dirk Mueller <dmueller@novell.com> 2009-06-08 10:04:48 MDT --- see Examples - zlib vs libz-devel and section 4b. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504769 User puzel@novell.com added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504769#c9 Petr Uzel <puzel@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #9 from Petr Uzel <puzel@novell.com> 2009-06-11 02:15:53 MDT --- pth-devel renamed to libpth-devel -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504769 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504769#c10 Christian Wittmer <chris@computersalat.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED CC| |chris@computersalat.de Resolution|FIXED | --- Comment #10 from Christian Wittmer <chris@computersalat.de> 2010-01-26 16:33:21 UTC --- Hi, reading and understanding are really two parts. libpth20, and pth-devel because Exception 4b is telling: If more than one version of a -devel package can be installed at the same time the -devel packages should be suffixed with a number that allows identifying the version of the library ==> So such a -devel package would be named lib$NAME$NUM-devel This is not the case here. devel package need to named pth-devel. Kind Regards Chris -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504769 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504769#c11 Petr Uzel <puzel@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #11 from Petr Uzel <puzel@novell.com> 2010-02-01 12:54:54 UTC --- As far as I understand, the exception 4b only states that if some condition is true, then the package should be named lib$NAME$NUM-devel. But it doesn't state that if the same condition is false (pth's case), then the package can not be named lib$NAME$NUM-devel. I agree with comment #7 and therefore I'm not going to rename the package again, sorry. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com