https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185613 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185613#c8 --- Comment #8 from Petr Gajdos <pgajdos@suse.com> --- (In reply to Petr Gajdos from comment #7)

(In reply to Ludwig Nussel from comment #5)

...

Binary packages of an OBS project are reused in different products. So what's correct to display really depends on what we want. Code stream or actually installed product? Evaluating os-release at run time, ie implement in C code would show the actually installed product.

Or even hard code it harder to s/BSD/SUSE/. Of course there can pop up

Took this way and submitted: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1055783

someone else with greater motivation to have $PRETTY_NAME in header/tailer of few manual pages.

Even this sounds ideal, yes, but in the course of almost two years none who would like to implement this feature appeared. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.