[Bug 359490] New: memtest reports memory failure but RAM is O.K.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490 Summary: memtest reports memory failure but RAM is O.K. Product: openSUSE 11.0 Version: Alpha 2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Live Medium AssignedTo: cthiel@novell.com ReportedBy: lmichnovic@novell.com QAContact: coolo@novell.com Found By: --- Running memtest from KDE LiveCD medium, it reports lots of failures of my RAM within 10 seconds. But the RAM is O.K. Running memtest from 10.3 instalation media, no failure of RAM. Running system is also without problems. RPM building and also. Tested on two computers with Via KT333 and Via KT133A chipsets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490
Christoph Thiel
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490
User asvetter@cip.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490#c1
Andreas Vetter
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490
User asvetter@cip.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490#c2
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Vetter
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490
User duwe@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490#c3
Torsten Duwe
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490
User duwe@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490#c4
Torsten Duwe
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490
User casualprogrammer@yahoo.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490#c5
--- Comment #5 from Casual J. Programmer
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490
User novell.com-pnt@ladisch.de added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490#c6
Julian Ladisch
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490
User novell.com-pnt@ladisch.de added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490#c7
Julian Ladisch
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490
User kernel01@hailfinger.org added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490#c8
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490
User koenig@linux.de added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490#c9
--- Comment #9 from Harald Koenig
The failing memory area is decoded to ROM space on most (all?) x86-compatible systems since 8086. Memtest should skip it by default and the area is marked "reserved" in the BIOS e820 memory map.
what's the difference between 10.3 (working) and 11.0 (throws errors) ? I've compared the source rpms -- they have identical contents (source, diffs): -rw-r--r-- 1 harald users 158966 Sep 22 2007 memtest86+-1.70-40.src.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 harald users 156612 Apr 12 22:53 memtest86+-1.70-68.src.rpm so it might be (a) the compiler etc. or (b) some differnece in system/memory setup from grub ?!? one note about the displayed addresses: somehow the decimal addresses don't match the hex address in my case. it looks like this: 0x000FFXXX 0.9 MB 0x000F8XXX 0.5 MB 0x000F3XXX 0.1 MB 0x000F1XXX 0.0 MB 0x000EFXXX 0.9 MB 0x000E3XXX 0.1 MB 0x000E1XXX 0.0 MB 0x000DEXXX 0,9 MB etc. so the decimal address looks something like ( hex_addr * 16 ) % 1MB. weird... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490
User lmichnovic@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490#c10
--- Comment #10 from Ladislav Michnovič
I've compared the source rpms -- they have identical contents (source, diffs):
-rw-r--r-- 1 harald users 158966 Sep 22 2007 memtest86+-1.70-40.src.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 harald users 156612 Apr 12 22:53 memtest86+-1.70-68.src.rpm
You can't compare RPMs. The newer one uses different compression algorithm than the older one. (RPMPayload has changed from bzip2 to lzma in Alpha 3+.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490
User koenig@linux.de added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490#c11
--- Comment #11 from Harald Koenig
-rw-r--r-- 1 harald users 158966 Sep 22 2007 memtest86+-1.70-40.src.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 harald users 156612 Apr 12 22:53 memtest86+-1.70-68.src.rpm
You can't compare RPMs. The newer one uses different compression algorithm than the older one. (RPMPayload has changed from bzip2 to lzma in Alpha 3+.)
yes, I can ;-) I used "rpm2cpio foo.rpm | cpio -idv" in two empty directories, then "diff dir1 dir2". result: only comments/changlog in spec file is different, *.tar.gz and diffs are identical. other possibility would be e.g. rpm -ihv foo1.src.rpm mv /usr/src/packages/SOURCES{,.1} mv /usr/src/packages/SPECS{,.1} mkdir /usr/src/packages/{SOURCES,SPECS} rpm -ihv foo2.src.rpm diff -u /usr/src/packages/SOURCES{1,2} or similar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490
User coolo@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490#c12
--- Comment #12 from Stephan Kulow
rpm -qp --nodigest --nosignature --qf "%{PAYLOADCOMPRESSOR}" memtest86+.spm gzip
-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490
User dave.plater@yahoo.co.uk added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490#c13
Dave Plater
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490
User casualprogrammer@yahoo.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490#c14
--- Comment #14 from Casual J. Programmer
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490
User dave.plater@yahoo.co.uk added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490#c15
--- Comment #15 from Dave Plater
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490
User casualprogrammer@yahoo.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490#c16
--- Comment #16 from Casual J. Programmer
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490
User kernel01@hailfinger.org added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490#c17
--- Comment #17 from Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
Upgraded to factory memtest86 1.70-69 i586 running Athlon 64 X2 4000 @2110Mhz and can confirm that memtest is definitely sick. It starts to fail and then goes haywire and it is impossible to exit except a hard reset.
Very interesting. So can you confirm that the problem not only affects the memtest on the CD, but also the installed version? And does a memtest from opensuse 10.3 work if you install it inside your 11.0beta1? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490
User koenig@linux.de added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490#c18
--- Comment #18 from Harald Koenig
(In reply to comment #13 from Dave Plater)
Upgraded to factory memtest86 1.70-69 i586 running Athlon 64 X2 4000 @2110Mhz and can confirm that memtest is definitely sick. It starts to fail and then goes haywire and it is impossible to exit except a hard reset.
Very interesting. So can you confirm that the problem not only affects the memtest on the CD, but also the installed version? And does a memtest from opensuse 10.3 work if you install it inside your 11.0beta1?
correct, same here on an IBM T60 (T7200 CPU). booting from the same grub from hard disk, the new memtest shows errors starting with test #2, while the memtest.bin from 10.3 is happy. details: errors from: harald > rpm -qf /boot/memtest.bin memtest86+-1.70-70 harald > md5sum /boot/memtest.bin 60f4e98a0fb2882334518c5b6d587745 /boot/memtest.bin working (no errors): harald > rpm -r /10.3 -qf /boot/memtest.bin memtest86+-1.70-40 harald > md5sum /10.3/boot/memtest.bin cdcba28768ebd7a6262f89165cf9f4f2 /10.3/boot/memtest.bin both binary are same size but different: harald > ll /boot/memtest.bin /10.3/boot/memtest.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 103100 Apr 25 22:54 /boot/memtest.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 103100 Sep 21 2007 /10.3/boot/memtest.bin harald > cmp -l /boot/memtest.bin /10.3/boot/memtest.bin | wc 68989 206967 1034835 please remember my comment #9 above! the sources/diffs in memtest *.src.rpm did not change between those versions, so it looks like a problem in the tool chain, isn't it ?!? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490
User dave.plater@yahoo.co.uk added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490#c19
--- Comment #19 from Dave Plater
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490
User kernel01@hailfinger.org added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490#c20
--- Comment #20 from Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490
User per.jessen@enidan.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490#c21
Per Jessen
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490
User coolo@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490#c22
--- Comment #22 from Stephan Kulow
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490
User koenig@linux.de added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490#c23
--- Comment #23 from Harald Koenig
we looked into this and it's the actual test routine - also in 2.01
indeed :-( and memtest86-3.4 does not work with gcc-4.3 either :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490
User coolo@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490#c24
Stephan Kulow
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490
User kernel01@hailfinger.org added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490#c25
--- Comment #25 from Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490
User casualprogrammer@yahoo.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490#c26
Casual J. Programmer
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490
User coolo@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490#c27
Stephan Kulow
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490
User casualprogrammer@yahoo.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490#c28
--- Comment #28 from Casual J. Programmer
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490
User coolo@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490#c29
--- Comment #29 from Stephan Kulow
As far as I see it, the broken memtest is now part of Beta2.
But you can't see beta2, only factory's boot.iso -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490
User koenig@linux.de added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490#c30
--- Comment #30 from Harald Koenig
As far as I see it, the broken memtest is now part of Beta2.
But you can't see beta2, only factory's boot.iso
ACK: memtest86+-2.01-2 works for me (tm). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490
User bgerz@gmx.net added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490#c31
Bruno Gerz
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490
User coolo@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359490#c32
--- Comment #32 from Stephan Kulow
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com