[Bug 706481] New: FOP: Problem with Image Width?
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706481 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706481#c0 Summary: FOP: Problem with Image Width? Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.4 Version: Factory Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Documentation AssignedTo: thomas.schraitle@novell.com ReportedBy: taroth@novell.com QAContact: ke@novell.com Found By: Documentation Blocker: --- XEP and FOP seem to handle the image width attributes slightly different: For example, Figure 1.5 is not shown completely when building a PDF with FOP, with XEP, it is complete. See https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=438018, p. 13. (I'm not sure if this is in fact an FOP issue. It might also be an effect of the new image handling processes introduced by the the DocBook Publishing and Authoring Suite (daps), the successor of susedoc). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706481 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706481#c Thomas Schraitle <thomas.schraitle@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |702276 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706481 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706481#c1 Thomas Schraitle <thomas.schraitle@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO InfoProvider| |taroth@suse.com --- Comment #1 from Thomas Schraitle <thomas.schraitle@suse.com> 2012-04-13 14:25:48 UTC --- I've built the openSUSE Startup and compared the PDF. Well, I cannot see any difference in regard to image width between XEP and FOP. However, the linebreaks and pagebreaks are different (but that was to be expected). Maybe we can look into this issue next week? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706481 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706481#c2 --- Comment #2 from Tanja Roth <taroth@suse.com> 2012-04-19 13:02:45 UTC --- Sorry, cited wrong attachment in the bug description, see https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=437718 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706481 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706481#c3 Thomas Schraitle <thomas.schraitle@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED InfoProvider|taroth@suse.com | Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #3 from Thomas Schraitle <thomas.schraitle@suse.com> 2012-04-19 13:55:06 UTC --- No problem. :) Together we found out that the respective graphic contained a typo in its width attribute (140% instead of less than 100%). Therefore, FOP used this value and override its margins. It seems to me, this is the correct behavior. For some reasons, XEP doesn't do the same as FOP and overprint the margins. It stays below 100%. It may be an implementation detail, but for the time being, it is not really a bug itself. Therefore, closing it as INVALID. Thanks anyway for the report and figuring it out with me! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com