https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204790 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204790#c2 Ludwig Nussel <lnussel@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED CC| |dleuenberger@suse.com Resolution|WONTFIX |--- --- Comment #2 from Ludwig Nussel <lnussel@suse.com> --- omg, yes I think we should get rid of that hack. glibc-devel-32bit already requires glibc-32bit so I think the first substitute is line is not needed at all. So can we introduce eg %with_biarch or something like that and have the basic logic in the gcc spec file itself? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.