https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487576 User burnus@gmx.de added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487576#c1 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2009-03-21 07:38:42 MST ---

Compiling the following program with gcc -m32 -fsignaling-nans test.c

Missed: "-lm": gcc -m32 -fsignaling-nans test.c -lm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487576 User pbaudis@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487576#c2 Petr Baudis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |burnus@gmx.de --- Comment #2 from Petr Baudis 2009-03-23 08:11:07 MST --- Why do you expect guaranteed SIGFPE for invalid logf() usage? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487576 User burnus@gmx.de added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487576#c4 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2009-03-28 06:26:14 MST --- I was told that on Gentoo (x86_64) it gives the expected SIGFPE with glibc 2.9. Also on Fedora 6 (x86_64) with glibc 2.5 shows the SIGFPE. Thus it must be a SUSE specific patch, probably one of the AMD math patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.