[Bug 809843] New: Random eth0/eth1 name spave with two Ethernet driver modules
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c0 Summary: Random eth0/eth1 name spave with two Ethernet driver modules Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 12.3 Version: Final Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: SUSE Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening@forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: werner@suse.com QAContact: qa-bugs@suse.de Found By: Development Blocker: --- The system here uses two ethernet card, one is used for external network including dsl. The other gigabit ethernet card is used as internal network. The problem is that the asignment of eth0 and eth1 is random. As workaround I've added the r8169 module to the initrd to make sure that this drive is asigned to eth0 for the internal network. Beside this I'm using ifup. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c1 --- Comment #1 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@suse.com> 2013-03-17 11:36:19 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=530065) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=530065) output of ifconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c2 --- Comment #2 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@suse.com> 2013-03-17 11:36:57 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=530066) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=530066) output of route -n -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c3 --- Comment #3 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@suse.com> 2013-03-17 11:39:47 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=530067) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=530067) firewall rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c4 Marius Tomaschewski <mt@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |duwe@suse.com, | |mfilka@suse.com AssignedTo|bnc-team-screening@forge.pr |fcrozat@suse.com |ovo.novell.com | --- Comment #4 from Marius Tomaschewski <mt@suse.com> 2013-03-18 15:53:17 UTC --- Yes, I've noticed too, that the persistent network interface name has been removed from udev and biosdevname usually does not work: e.g. on a Dell OptiPlex 960, because there is smbios 2.5 and the biosdevname rule explicitly checks for 2.6; further, one of the NICs is not from Dell, but an additional TP-Link (r8169) PCIe Card. When I've observed it correctly on a Dell OptiPlex 990 (SMBIOS 2.6), it is not reliable; before [SLES-11-SP2] a r8169 card were renamed to p1p1, on [SLES-11-SP3] p1p4. Workaround is to add rules to the /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules, e.g.: # PCI device 0x8086:/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:19.0 (e1000e) SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="00:26:b9:8e:f8:66", ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="nic0" # PCI device 0x10ec:/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1c.1/0000:03:00.0 (r8169) SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="90:f6:52:03:62:50", ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="nic1" The rules can be IMO added using yast2. To avoid rename problems, use something else than "ethX" for the names. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c Frederic Crozat <fcrozat@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|fcrozat@suse.com |rmilasan@suse.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c5 --- Comment #5 from Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> 2013-03-18 16:55:02 UTC --- Like Marius said, in the newer udev the persistent names are dropped and before they were unreliable which I can't do anyting about. Now the fact that eth0 is renamed to eth1 or something like that, is not udev, udev doesn't handle the network devices anymore, so not much I can do here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c6 Marius Tomaschewski <mt@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |meissner@suse.com See Also| |https://bugzilla.novell.com | |/show_bug.cgi?id=810076 --- Comment #6 from Marius Tomaschewski <mt@suse.com> 2013-03-18 18:13:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5)
Like Marius said, in the newer udev the persistent names are dropped and before they were unreliable which I can't do anyting about.
This is not correct. biosdevname is not reliable, not even on Dell boxes, where it aims to work: see bnc#810076 (because of BIOS versions, bugs in biosdecode, BIOS update?). Renaming inside of the same namespace as the kernel e.g. "eth" like try to rename "eth1" to "eth0" and "eth0" to "eth1" is not reliable. This is just a question of using different name scheme (e.g. "nicX") than the kernel to be reliable.
Now the fact that eth0 is renamed to eth1 or something like that, is not udev, udev doesn't handle the network devices anymore, so not much I can do here.
This is a mandatory functionality which has to available - we need a replacement. Just dropping it without a replacement is a no-go. Do you provide any replacement? We've dropped the persistent name encoding from sysconfig (ifcfg-bus-... ifcfg-id... on 10.x/SLES-10), because udev aimed to provide it. Removing persistent interface names breaks almost every network related configuration file, including sysconfig, SuSEfirewall2, dhcp, ... It is simply not possible to rewrite any configuration file at boot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c7 --- Comment #7 from Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> 2013-03-18 18:32:44 UTC --- I haven't dropped this, upstream did and I do understand why. There are problems with persistent names not actually changing the name, in some cases having network devices called 'rename5' or 'rename9', etc. Now we could revert the change and re-add the persistent rule, but again thats broken and then it can start with bugs that it doesn't work correctly. To be honest from my side, I've no idea whats a good idea or in what direction to go. I would like this to be fixed, but don't wanna re-add something that is broken by design, like the persistent rule. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c8 --- Comment #8 from Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> 2013-03-18 18:38:44 UTC --- I'll try to research this, maybe I'll be able to come up with something functional. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c Per Jessen <per@computer.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |per@computer.org Summary|Random eth0/eth1 name spave |Random eth0/eth1 name space |with two Ethernet driver |with two Ethernet driver |modules |modules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c9 --- Comment #9 from Per Jessen <per@computer.org> 2013-03-18 19:05:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4)
Yes, I've noticed too, that the persistent network interface name has been removed from udev and biosdevname usually does not work:
See perhaps bug#676025. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c10 Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #10 from Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> 2013-03-19 07:29:39 UTC --- I've did some small checking and seems that biosdevnames actually work, but not for openSUSE. For example booting Fedora on the same setup, has biosdevnames enable and working well, but openSUSE no, even if setup and even if adding biosdevname=1 doesn't work. After some more research turns out that biosdevname doesn't work in openSUSE due to option '--nopirq'. If we run in openSUSE: /sbin/biosdevname --policy physical --smbios 2.6 -i eth0 (it works) /sbin/biosdevname --policy physical --smbios 2.6 --nopirq -i eth0 (doesn't work) and Fedora uses: /sbin/biosdevname --policy physical -i eth0 (it works) The initial issue I can't reproduce, but I'll keep looking. openSUSE using: /sbin/biosdevname --policy physical --smbios 2.6 -d: BIOS device: p2p1 Kernel name: eth0 Permanent MAC: 08:00:27:81:C5:31 Assigned MAC : 08:00:27:81:C5:31 ifIndex: 2 Driver: e1000 Driver version: 7.3.21-k8-NAPI Firmware version: Bus Info: 0000:00:03.0 PCI name : 0000:00:03.0 PCI Slot : 2 Index in slot: 1 /sbin/biosdevname --policy physical --smbios 2.6 --nopirq -d: BIOS device: Kernel name: eth0 Permanent MAC: 08:00:27:81:C5:31 Assigned MAC : 08:00:27:81:C5:31 ifIndex: 2 Driver: e1000 Driver version: 7.3.21-k8-NAPI Firmware version: Bus Info: 0000:00:03.0 PCI name : 0000:00:03.0 PCI Slot : Unknown Index in slot: 0 As you can see the first one is missing 'BIOS device', but the second example has 'BIOS device'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c11 --- Comment #11 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@suse.com> 2013-03-19 08:02:10 UTC --- Q: Would it make sence to use temporary udev rules below /dev/.udev/rules.d/ before loading the ethernet driver modules? With such a rule which would look like one of the old lines in /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules and shell code like modprobe $module udevadm settle it should work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c12 --- Comment #12 from Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> 2013-03-19 08:08:21 UTC --- Not sure if I get you, how do you know which is which and what name the device has? Based on what you writing a rule in /dev/.udev/rules.d/ ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO InfoProvider| |werner@suse.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c13 Dr. Werner Fink <werner@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED InfoProvider|werner@suse.com | --- Comment #13 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@suse.com> 2013-03-19 08:33:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) Just add a variable HWADDR with the hardware address of the network device to the ifcfg-eth<#> files. Then a rule file /dev/.udev/rules.d/70-network-eth<#>.rules with e.g. for cfg in /etc/sysconfig/network/ifcfg-eth* ; do unset HWADDR . $cfg test -n "$HWADDR" || continue ETHNUM=${cfg#*ifcfg-} echo 'SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*"', \ 'ATTR{address}=="'$HWADDR'", ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0", ATTR{type}=="1",' \ 'KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="'$ETHNUM'"' > /dev/.udev/rules.d/70-network-$ETHNUM.rules done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c14 Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO InfoProvider| |werner@suse.com --- Comment #14 from Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> 2013-03-19 08:42:16 UTC --- Well I suppose $ETHNUM you expect it to be something like eth0 or eth1 and so on, but this was the main issue with the persistent rules that it can end-up in a collision due to what the kernel says the device name is and what you wanna name the device. Could you try this: created a new file in /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/80-net-name-slot.rules and add the following: -- # do not edit this file, it will be overwritten on update ACTION=="remove", GOTO="net_name_slot_end" SUBSYSTEM!="net", GOTO="net_name_slot_end" NAME!="", GOTO="net_name_slot_end" ENV{ID_NET_NAME_ONBOARD}!="", NAME="$env{ID_NET_NAME_ONBOARD}" ENV{ID_NET_NAME_SLOT}!="", NAME="$env{ID_NET_NAME_SLOT}" ENV{ID_NET_NAME_PATH}!="", NAME="$env{ID_NET_NAME_PATH}" LABEL="net_name_slot_end" -- and of course reboot. Seems that this is how upstream fixed the issue with the network devices, can't say it's working as in VirtualBox it doesn't, but maybe on a physical system it does. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c15 --- Comment #15 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@suse.com> 2013-03-19 08:49:24 UTC --- OK ... but this will take a while as the system is at home not in work -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c16 --- Comment #16 from Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> 2013-03-19 08:56:05 UTC --- Ohh, it's OK, I guess we can wait until you're able to test. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c17 --- Comment #17 from Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> 2013-03-19 12:38:16 UTC --- Werner, sorry, but the rules is useless. We need builtin net_id also for this to work, which currently doesn't exist in systemd/udev 195. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c18 --- Comment #18 from Marius Tomaschewski <mt@suse.com> 2013-03-19 17:29:05 UTC --- Robert, "/sbin/biosdevname --policy physical --smbios 2.6 -d" without the "--nopirq" option seems to work on my Dell OptiPlex 960. It produces different results -- on OptiPlex 990 / SMBIOS 2.6: @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ sysfs Label: Onboard LAN Embedded Index: 1 -BIOS device: p8p1 +BIOS device: p2p1 Kernel name: nic2 Permanent MAC: 54:E6:FC:80:19:08 Assigned MAC : 54:E6:FC:80:19:08 @@ -24,10 +24,10 @@ Firmware version: N/A Bus Info: 0000:03:00.0 PCI name : 0000:03:00.0 -PCI Slot : 8 +PCI Slot : 2 Index in slot: 1 -BIOS device: p16p1 +BIOS device: p1p1 Kernel name: nic1 Permanent MAC: 68:05:CA:0A:39:E7 Assigned MAC : 68:05:CA:0A:39:E7 @@ -36,6 +36,6 @@ Firmware version: 1.8-0 Bus Info: 0000:01:00.0 PCI name : 0000:01:00.0 -PCI Slot : 16 +PCI Slot : 1 Index in slot: 1 See also bnc#810076. Removing the "--smbios 2.6" option as you found on Fedora, enables the use of older bios versions which are known to be buggy... ?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c19 --- Comment #19 from Marius Tomaschewski <mt@suse.com> 2013-03-19 17:38:45 UTC --- BTW: Does biosdevname or net_id deal also with miltiport nics like mlx4, that use one device (same bus-id, port in /sys/class/net/XXX/dev_id)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c20 Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- InfoProvider|werner@suse.com |duwe@suse.com --- Comment #20 from Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> 2013-03-19 17:51:32 UTC --- Marius, net_id is not available in current version of systemd/udev 195 available in openSUSE 12.3 and biosdevname, have no idea. Lets ask Torsten. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c21 --- Comment #21 from Per Jessen <per@computer.org> 2013-03-19 18:53:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #18)
Robert, "/sbin/biosdevname --policy physical --smbios 2.6 -d" without the "--nopirq" option seems to work on my Dell OptiPlex 960.
I tried on a couple of different HP DL380 (latest BIOS) biosdevname --policy physical --smbios 2.6 -d All "BIOS device" lines are empty. (doesn't matter if I include --nopirq or not). Same on an HP DL580G4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c22 --- Comment #22 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@suse.com> 2013-03-19 22:41:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) This was useless, just removed the r8169 from initrd, then add the file /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/80-net-name-slot.rules and rebooted ... the r8169 for the onboard ethernet device had become eth1 instead of eth0. After adding r8169 to initrd and reboot I'm now able to write this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c23 --- Comment #23 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@suse.com> 2013-03-19 22:46:47 UTC --- Just to show # readlink -f /sys/class/net/eth0/device /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1c.5/0000:05:00.0 # find /sys/ -name 0000:05:00.0 /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:05:00.0 /sys/bus/pci/drivers/r8169/0000:05:00.0 /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1c.5/0000:05:00.0 # readlink -f /sys/class/net/eth1/device /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1c.4/0000:03:00.0/0000:04:00.0 # find /sys/ -name 0000:04:00.0 /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:04:00.0 /sys/bus/pci/drivers/8139too/0000:04:00.0 /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1c.4/0000:03:00.0/0000:04:00.0 this is how it should be -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c24 --- Comment #24 from Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> 2013-03-20 07:04:18 UTC --- OK, seems the bringing back persistent rules is the only way to fix it. So for openSUSE 12.3 that will be the fix I guess. As biosdevname doesn't work properly, so we can't rely on it, plus back-porting net_id (way too much and intrusive), I guess I'll try to bring back the persistent rule and will give you some test rpm's to see if all works. The next release of openSUSE will contain all necessary parts (net_id, hwdb) so we can really drop persistent rules, but until then don't think there is another way. Werner, your idea with the small script is good, but this means that ifcfg-eth* has to be created before and a lot of people may not know how or yast2-network has to be modified, so for the moment, don't think is worth doing it, but your idea has been implemented by Fedora with something called "rename_devices". I don't like this, but don't see how else we could fix this fast. If anyone has a better idea, please speak out :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c25 --- Comment #25 from Bernhard Wiedemann <bwiedemann@suse.com> 2013-03-20 12:00:11 CET --- This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration: This bug (809843) was mentioned in https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/160211 Factory / systemd https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/160212 Maintenance / -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c27 --- Comment #27 from Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> 2013-03-20 14:31:26 UTC --- It's OK Torsten, I've re-added the persistent rules for openSUSE 12.3 and should fix the issue. The next version of openSUSE and of course udev will have the full implementation of net_id and hwdb which should handle the network correctly, until then we rely on persistent rules. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c28 Cristian Rodríguez <crrodriguez@opensuse.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |crrodriguez@opensuse.org --- Comment #28 from Cristian Rodríguez <crrodriguez@opensuse.org> 2013-03-20 18:36:37 CLT --- (In reply to comment #27)
It's OK Torsten, I've re-added the persistent rules for openSUSE 12.3 and should fix the issue. The next version of openSUSE and of course udev will have the full implementation of net_id and hwdb which should handle the network correctly, until then we rely on persistent rules.
I have a question .. why this rules were restored in factory when they are already obsolete ? the next iteration will have http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PredictableNetworkInterface... and all this is moot.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c29 --- Comment #29 from Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> 2013-03-21 07:10:07 UTC --- Because factory is not yet updated to the latest version of systemd, so if someone wants to use factory then at least until systemd will be update, they will have a proper network. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c30 Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jnelson-suse@jamponi.net --- Comment #30 from Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> 2013-03-22 08:28:10 UTC --- *** Bug 810909 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810909 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c31 --- Comment #31 from Michal Filka <mfilka@suse.com> 2013-03-22 09:33:41 UTC --- Note that persistent net rules are needed for installer too (to survive reboots during netinstall). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c32 --- Comment #32 from Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> 2013-03-22 09:42:14 UTC --- I really don't think we will update the installer/ISO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c33 --- Comment #33 from Benjamin Brunner <bbrunner@suse.com> 2013-03-27 15:17:32 CET --- Update released for openSUSE 12.3. And no unfortunately it's not possible to update the ISO of a released version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c34 --- Comment #34 from Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> 2013-03-27 14:29:27 UTC --- Yeah, I kind of knew it, but thanks for the confirmation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c35 --- Comment #35 from Swamp Workflow Management <swamp@suse.de> 2013-03-27 16:05:19 UTC --- openSUSE-RU-2013:0551-1: An update that has one recommended fix can now be installed. Category: recommended (low) Bug References: 809843 CVE References: Sources used: openSUSE 12.3 (src): systemd-195-13.14.1, systemd-mini-195-13.14.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c36 Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO InfoProvider| |werner@suse.com --- Comment #36 from Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> 2013-03-27 18:15:44 UTC --- Werner, systemd/udev is available to be updated, please try it and let me know. I would like to close this as fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c37 Dr. Werner Fink <werner@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED InfoProvider|werner@suse.com | --- Comment #37 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@suse.com> 2013-03-28 07:54:54 UTC --- Sory but after installing the updates and reboot, removing the r8169 module from initrd, and a second reboot the order of the nethwork decive become wrong. I'll attach the last few lines of /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules and the output of ifconfig. Maybe it should be noted that if the r8169 module is added to INITRD_MODULES variable of /etc/sysconfig/kernel the mkinitrd also includes a lot of firmware stuff for the module (see modinfo r8169) ... maybe this cause a runtime problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c38 --- Comment #38 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@suse.com> 2013-03-28 07:56:55 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=532351) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=532351) the last lines of 70-persistent-net.rules and the output of ifconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c39 Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO InfoProvider| |werner@suse.com --- Comment #39 from Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> 2013-03-28 07:59:29 UTC --- I don't think it became wrong, it's more which was first was setup as eth0. This is how it worked before and this is how it will work maybe always. Not sure how it will be in 13.1, but wouldn't bet it would change much, besides maybe the actual name of the device. Sorry, but don't see anything there to tell me is wrong. Is wrong based on what you would like or what? Change them manually, eth0 to eth1 and eth1 to eth0 if it's really what you need. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c40 Dr. Werner Fink <werner@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED InfoProvider|werner@suse.com | --- Comment #40 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@suse.com> 2013-03-28 08:30:20 UTC --- IMHO ... ATTR{address}=="00:25:22:9f:d6:c9" ... KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth0 ... ATTR{address}=="00:00:1c:d9:11:e7" ... KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth1 versus eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:1C:D9:11:E7 eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:25:22:9F:D6:C9 is wrong, isn't it. In other words the persistent rule set had not worked. Changing naming I had tried several times (before installing the update) and detected that it may work with the next boot but then found the it also can fail as the order or eth0/eth1 in comparision to r8169/8139too is random. The only solution seems to be to load the module for eth0 (which was always r8169 with openSUSE 11.4 the onboard network chip) much before the other module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c41 Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO InfoProvider| |werner@suse.com --- Comment #41 from Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> 2013-03-28 08:33:09 UTC --- Ahh, I see it now, didn't even check the mac address. You could try to enable debugging in udev and attach it to the bug, not sure whats wrong with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c42 --- Comment #42 from Per Jessen <per@computer.org> 2013-03-28 08:38:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #40)
IMHO
... ATTR{address}=="00:25:22:9f:d6:c9" ... KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth0 ... ATTR{address}=="00:00:1c:d9:11:e7" ... KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth1
versus
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:1C:D9:11:E7 eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:25:22:9F:D6:C9
is wrong, isn't it.
This is an ongoing thread about exactly this problem: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse/2013-03/msg01075.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c43 --- Comment #43 from Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> 2013-03-28 08:50:45 UTC --- OK, did some small checking and you are totally right, looks like udev can't rename the interfaces. Mar 28 09:47:32 opensuse123.suse.cz systemd-udevd[276]: IMPORT builtin 'pci-db' /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/75-net-description.rules:11 Mar 28 09:47:32 opensuse123.suse.cz systemd-udevd[276]: error changing net interface name eth1 to eth0: File exists I've modified manually the rule and used for example 'nic0' and 'nic1' and that works all the time. Something changed in the code that doesn't do anymore the renaming correctly, meaning that before if it couldn't rename it (because it exists) it would try to rename first 'eth0-eth1' and then rename it to the correct one, but that behavior has changed. Will try to see how it could be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c44 --- Comment #44 from Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> 2013-03-28 09:20:55 UTC --- OK, I think I've fixed it. Will give you soon a link from where you should try to install and check udev. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c45 --- Comment #45 from Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> 2013-03-28 09:24:05 UTC --- This was the issue or the missing code in rename_netif: Mar 28 10:19:32 opensuse123.suse.cz systemd-udevd[270]: renamed network interface eth1 to rename3 Mar 28 10:19:32 opensuse123.suse.cz systemd-udevd[271]: renamed network interface eth0 to eth1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c46 --- Comment #46 from Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> 2013-03-28 09:30:42 UTC --- Right now systemd/udev is building and should be done in about an hour (if OBS is nice), so you could get the rpms like this: osc getbinaries home:rmilasan:branches:Base:System systemd openSUSE_Factory x86_64 or go to: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=systemd&project=home%3Armilasan%3Abranches%3ABase%3ASystem Please install them and try it out. I've already tested this and worked as expected, but don't wanna do another update which will create issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c47 --- Comment #47 from Marius Tomaschewski <mt@suse.com> 2013-03-28 13:50:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #45)
This was the issue or the missing code in rename_netif:
Mar 28 10:19:32 opensuse123.suse.cz systemd-udevd[270]: renamed network interface eth1 to rename3 Mar 28 10:19:32 opensuse123.suse.cz systemd-udevd[271]: renamed network interface eth0 to eth1
Udev has to rename to ifindex based $tmpname first as soon as possible, so another rule is able to rename to the currently occupied name. Basically something like this ("pseudo code" just for illustration): tmp="tmp" ip link set name "$wanted" dev "$current" && return 0 || { # rename to tmpname to allow another rule to rename to $current read idx < "/sys/class/net/$current/ifindex" tmpname="${tmp}-${idx}" ip link set name "$tmpname" || return 1 # schedule a "rename later" / do it in background current="$tmpname" ( for ((i=0; i<1000; i++)) ; do ip link set name "$wanted" dev "$current" && return 0 usleep 25000 done ) & disown -a } and it were IMO doing this before. It could be, that this were a patch before. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c48 --- Comment #48 from Marius Tomaschewski <mt@suse.com> 2013-03-28 13:52:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #47)
ip link set name "$tmpname" || return 1 ip link set name "$tmpname" dev "$current" || return 1
-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c49 --- Comment #49 from Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> 2013-03-28 13:59:03 UTC --- Already fixed the issue, but would like for Werner to test it out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c50 --- Comment #50 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@suse.com> 2013-03-28 16:09:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #49) Teh only problem is that there is no version for 12.3 as systemd does not build due pkgconfig(libselinux) >= 2.1.9 on my system there is a libselinux1 with version 2.1.9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c51 Dr. Werner Fink <werner@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED InfoProvider|werner@suse.com | --- Comment #51 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@suse.com> 2013-03-28 16:41:14 UTC --- OK ... I've tried factory version of udev-195-360.1: /home/werner> sudo journalctl | grep systemd-udev Mar 28 17:33:22 speedy systemd-udevd[156]: starting version 195 Mar 28 17:33:22 speedy systemd-udevd[332]: starting version 195 Mar 28 17:33:22 speedy systemd-udevd[354]: renamed network interface eth0 to rename2 Mar 28 17:33:22 speedy systemd-udevd[350]: renamed network interface eth1 to eth0 Mar 28 17:33:22 speedy systemd-udevd[354]: renamed network interface rename2 to eth1 and it really works! Congrats! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c52 --- Comment #52 from Bernhard Wiedemann <bwiedemann@suse.com> 2013-04-02 10:00:09 CEST --- This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration: This bug (809843) was mentioned in https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/162065 Maintenance / -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c53 --- Comment #53 from Bernhard Wiedemann <bwiedemann@suse.com> 2013-04-02 11:00:11 CEST --- This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration: This bug (809843) was mentioned in https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/162072 Factory / systemd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c54 --- Comment #54 from Bernhard Wiedemann <bwiedemann@suse.com> 2013-04-03 10:00:49 CEST --- This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration: This bug (809843) was mentioned in https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/162339 Maintenance / -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c55 Dr. Werner Fink <werner@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO InfoProvider| |rmilasan@suse.com OS/Version|SUSE Other |openSUSE 12.3 Severity|Major |Normal --- Comment #55 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@suse.com> 2013-04-05 07:31:05 UTC --- IMHO this one is a fixed one -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c56 Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |RESOLVED InfoProvider|rmilasan@suse.com | Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #56 from Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> 2013-04-05 07:36:51 UTC --- I believe the same, will close this as RESOLVED/FIXED. In case the situation happens again, it can be re-opened. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c57 --- Comment #57 from Swamp Workflow Management <swamp@suse.de> 2013-04-08 15:05:08 UTC --- openSUSE-RU-2013:0642-1: An update that has two recommended fixes can now be installed. Category: recommended (low) Bug References: 746595,809843 CVE References: Sources used: openSUSE 12.3 (src): systemd-195-13.18.1, systemd-mini-195-13.18.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c58 Reinhard Max <max@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED CC| |max@suse.com Resolution|FIXED | --- Comment #58 from Reinhard Max <max@suse.com> 2013-04-08 22:30:20 CEST --- On two machines with multiple Ethernet interfaces (one with three, the other with two), I still get the network devices assigned randomly after installing the update and editing the ethX devices in 70-persistent-net.rules to be as I want them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c59 Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |NEEDINFO InfoProvider| |max@suse.com --- Comment #59 from Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> 2013-04-09 07:08:46 UTC --- Can you give me the first couple of lines of 'rpm -q --changelog udev'? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c60 Reinhard Max <max@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |REOPENED InfoProvider|max@suse.com | --- Comment #60 from Reinhard Max <max@suse.com> 2013-04-09 09:20:42 CEST --- --- snip --- * Mi Mär 20 2013 rmilasan@suse.com - udev: re-add persistent network rules (bnc#809843). add: 1026-re-add-persistent-net.patch - rebase all patches, ensure that they apply properly. --- snap --- The entries in 70-persistent-net.rules were created again, after installing this update, but they didn't seem to get used upon reboot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c61 --- Comment #61 from Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> 2013-04-09 07:33:23 UTC --- Update systemd/udev, the next update fixes the issue. I added the persistent rule, but didn't add the proper rename functionality :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843#c62 Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #62 from Robert Milasan <rmilasan@suse.com> 2013-04-15 07:46:57 UTC --- Closing this as RESOLVED/FIXED, again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com