http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124152 Roger Whittaker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |roger.whittaker@suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124152 Oliver Kurz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |okurz@suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124152 Ludwig Nussel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lnussel@suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124152 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124152#c10 --- Comment #10 from Marius Tomaschewski --- More exactly, it is because of improper merge of the migration hooks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124152 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124152#c12 Marius Tomaschewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #12 from Marius Tomaschewski --- OK, mea culpa, mea maxima cupla, sorry! The migration using packages from Base:System works for me. Please reopen when it does not. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124152 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124152#c15 --- Comment #15 from Thorsten Kukuk --- (In reply to Ludwig Nussel from comment #14)

is the %post snippet the right way to fix this? In transactional mode rpms are not meant to mess with the running system, right?

The %post is from me from June 2018 and yes, it does not work with transactional-update anymore. But after it was accepted in June last year, I assumed that it will be part of Factory before we make the big /var cleanup. I would have never imagined, that it takes 7-8 month until it ends in Factory, after the big /var cleanup :( So it will not work on systems which have the new /var layout, but it should work with systems with the old filesystem layout, where /var was part of the root snapshot. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124152 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124152#c18 Thorsten Kukuk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED |--- --- Comment #18 from Thorsten Kukuk --- The following file solves the problem for me with transactional-updates, as the move of the files is done during the first boot if not already happen during upgrade: # cat /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/sysconfig-netconfig.conf C /var/lib/netconfig - - - - /var/adm/netconfig R /var/adm/netconfig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124152 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124152#c20 --- Comment #20 from Thorsten Kukuk --- (In reply to Marius Tomaschewski from comment #19)

Does it helps/make sense to remove the move of the state completely?

If you don't store md5 sums anymore, you can remove the move to /var/lib. But /Var/adm will go away in the future. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124152 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124152#c22 --- Comment #22 from Swamp Workflow Management --- This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration: This bug (1124152) was mentioned in https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/675195 Factory / sysconfig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.