[Bug 1134353] adopting BFQ to control I/O
26 Jul
2019
26 Jul
'19
12:29
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134353 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134353#c29 --- Comment #29 from Andreas Herrmann <aherrmann@suse.com> --- Created attachment 811757 --> http://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=811757&action=edit Comparison of results of io-fio-randread-async-seqwrite-ext4 for bfq/mq-deadline (node 0) When I've seen that numastats of test runs for bfq differed when run with low_latency=0 vs. low_latency=1 I've decided to see what difference it makes when the test is pinned to either node0 or node1. FWIW, these are the results when the test is pinned to Node 0. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
1987
Age (days ago)
1987
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com