http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030233 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030233#c4 Coly Li <colyli@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|colyli@suse.com |kernel-maintainers@forge.pr | |ovo.novell.com --- Comment #4 from Coly Li <colyli@suse.com> --- (In reply to Coly Li from comment #3)

(In reply to Jiri Slaby from comment #2)

...

I believe Coly Li fixed this in commit:

commit 71bb629aa7d4e13a468e6513cf697231550c8cfa Author: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Date: Fri Apr 7 01:02:17 2017 +0800

Right?

Shame on me for the big-single-bloody commit. I was young at that time, now I do back port one-commit-one-patch.

Back to the topic, yes, in this back port bi_rw is renamed to bi_opf, I provided several dependent patches so we didn't need a rebased patch, I replaced the rebased patch (from Hannes Reinecke) with an upstream patch.

I guess lustre is far from being up to date in SLE12-SP3 kernel...

I believe both openSUSE and SLE won't support lustre, just fix a compiling error may introduce more potential bugs. I'd rather to keep it untouched, until we decide to support lustre in openSUSE. Assign this bug back to default assignee. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.