[Bug 384844] New: all updates have version 11.0
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844 Summary: all updates have version 11.0 Product: openSUSE 11.0 Version: Beta 1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: libzypp AssignedTo: zypp-maintainers@forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: mvidner@novell.com QAContact: dmacvicar@novell.com Found By: --- See how the patch "serial number" incremented sequentially by the maintenance team is considered a part of the name and version is constantly 11.0. It may be intentional, but it looks more like a bug. BTW, where is the specification for the new patch metadata format? totoro:~ # LANG=C zypper lu Reading installed packages... Patches Repository: | Name | Version | Category | Status -------------+-----------------+---------+-------------+------- 110updates | SuSEfirewall2-5 | 11.0 | recommended | Needed 110updates | kernel-4 | 11.0 | recommended | Needed The metadata are as follows: http://download.opensuse.org/update/11.0/repodata/updateinfo-update-test-opt... <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!--PATCHINFO id="fabf853ecfb7645e0d5787ef623dd2d3"!--> <update status="stable" from="maint-coord@suse.de" type="optional" version="11.0"> <id>update-test-optional-6</id> <title>Test update of update-test-optional</title> <release>openSUSE 11.0</release> <issued date="1208993304"/> .. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844 User jreidinger@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844#c1 Josef Reidinger <jreidinger@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jreidinger@novell.com --- Comment #1 from Josef Reidinger <jreidinger@novell.com> 2008-05-22 09:01:41 MST --- I don't see any bug in libzypp. Metadata only contain version="11.0" nothing else so It looks like that parsed version is correct. But it looks like that information about format in wiki is not correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844 User mvidner@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844#c2 --- Comment #2 from Martin Vidner <mvidner@novell.com> 2008-05-22 09:57:28 MST ---
But it looks like that information about format in wiki is not correct. ENOURL
-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844 User jreidinger@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844#c3 --- Comment #3 from Josef Reidinger <jreidinger@novell.com> 2008-05-23 00:10:58 MST --- I think this URL says about patch format - http://en.opensuse.org/Libzypp/Metadata/repomd/patches -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844 User schubi@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844#c4 Stefan Schubert <schubi@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |schubi@novell.com AssignedTo|zypp-maintainers@forge.provo.novell.com |hmuelle@novell.com --- Comment #4 from Stefan Schubert <schubi@novell.com> 2008-05-23 02:45:56 MST --- Harald, feel free to close that bug, if this is intent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844 User hmuelle@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844#c5 Harald Mueller-Ney <hmuelle@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ro@novell.com, hmuelle@novell.com AssignedTo|hmuelle@novell.com |dmacvicar@novell.com --- Comment #5 from Harald Mueller-Ney <hmuelle@novell.com> 2008-05-25 14:46:06 MDT --- AFAIK updateinfo is still generated by Duncan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844 User ro@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844#c6 Ruediger Oertel <ro@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|dmacvicar@novell.com |ro@novell.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #6 from Ruediger Oertel <ro@novell.com> 2008-05-25 17:37:52 MDT --- no, it's really my bug ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844 User ro@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844#c7 Ruediger Oertel <ro@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |dmacvicar@novell.com --- Comment #7 from Ruediger Oertel <ro@novell.com> 2008-05-25 17:43:43 MDT --- unfortunately, the URL above does not speak at all about updateinfo.xml I just don't know what to put in the version field, I took the 11.0 from duncan's original example file and that's how it stil is. If <version> should be the patchnumber, I have no problem with that. Same question about <release>, I found "openSUSE 11.0" in the example and that's what I'm putting there. Duncan: what should be in these two attributes ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844 User dmacvicar@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844#c8 Duncan Mac-Vicar <dmacvicar@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Info Provider|dmacvicar@novell.com |kkaempf@novell.com --- Comment #8 from Duncan Mac-Vicar <dmacvicar@novell.com> 2008-05-26 02:22:51 MDT --- My 11.0 was taken from Klaus examples. yes, version should be the patchnumber I guess. In order to have patch levels. Just for Klaus: That is still an open issue. We can't make patches require the previous versions, we can't make patches require the previous patchlevel, so we still need to define how to calculate patchlevel. However, having patches versioned in a incremental way (like we do IIRC), makes easy to calculate the major satisfied continuous patch, and that should be the patch level. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844 User ro@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844#c9 --- Comment #9 from Ruediger Oertel <ro@novell.com> 2008-05-26 02:33:35 MDT --- okay, setting <version> to the patchnumber. What about <release> ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844 User kkaempf@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844#c10 Klaus Kämpf <kkaempf@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kkaempf@novell.com --- Comment #10 from Klaus Kämpf <kkaempf@novell.com> 2008-05-26 03:21:12 MDT --- <release> in Fedora is set to the Distribution, i.e. "Fedora 8". As we want to be upstream-compatible, we should _not_ map this release information to the 'release' property of the zypp patch object ! I'd recommend to leave the release part of the zypp patch object empty. If we ever re-release a patch, we should increase its version field. updateinfo.xml carries an <id>....</id> field for internal information (<title>... is the user-visible part). For computing the patch level, the 'order of external appearance' (when was the update publically visible) is important. Thats what the <issued data="..."/> field contains. I'll start an opensuse wiki page to document the updateinfo.xml format _as we use it_ now. See http://en.opensuse.org/Patch_Management/Code11/Updateinfo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844 User dmacvicar@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844#c11 --- Comment #11 from Duncan Mac-Vicar <dmacvicar@novell.com> 2008-05-26 03:27:20 MDT --- It is documented, just need good comments. Just reference http://svn.opensuse.org/svn/zypp/trunk/libzypp/zypp/parser/yum/schema/update... from that wiki page, and keep the specification in svn :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844 User kkaempf@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844#c12 Klaus Kämpf <kkaempf@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Info Provider|kkaempf@novell.com | --- Comment #12 from Klaus Kämpf <kkaempf@novell.com> 2008-05-26 03:41:34 MDT --- Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844 User mvidner@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844#c13 --- Comment #13 from Martin Vidner <mvidner@novell.com> 2008-05-28 06:36:42 MDT --- I checked that in http://download.opensuse.org/update/11.0/repodata/updateinfo.xml.gz , update/@version has the patch number instead of 11.0. I think we can close this or morph it into "Updateinfo is undocumented". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844 User ro@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844#c14 Ruediger Oertel <ro@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |dmacvicar@novell.com --- Comment #14 from Ruediger Oertel <ro@novell.com> 2008-05-28 07:36:23 MDT --- yes, I re-did all the 11.0 patches to fix this one (after changing the putpatch code). still open: what to use in the release tag ? really change to "" (currently I'm using "openSUSE 11.0", but that's hardcoded right now, but I could also use some form of the product name there). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844 User jkupec@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844#c15 Ján Kupec <jkupec@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jkupec@novell.com --- Comment #15 from Ján Kupec <jkupec@novell.com> 2008-05-29 07:29:41 MDT --- (In reply to comment #13 from Martin Vidner)
I checked that in http://download.opensuse.org/update/11.0/repodata/updateinfo.xml.gz , update/@version has the patch number instead of 11.0.
Confirmed, but still the patch names contain also the numbers, is that intended? Catalog (oops) | Name | Version | Category | Status ------------------+------------------------+---------+-------------+---------- 11.0 Test Updates | SuSEfirewall2-5 | 5 | recommended | Installed 11.0 Test Updates | update-test-security-8 | 8 | security | Needed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844 User jkupec@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844#c16 --- Comment #16 from Ján Kupec <jkupec@novell.com> 2008-05-29 07:59:39 MDT --- *** Bug 395413 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=395413 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844 Ján Kupec <jkupec@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|Normal |Critical -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844 User dmacvicar@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844#c17 --- Comment #17 from Duncan Mac-Vicar <dmacvicar@novell.com> 2008-05-29 10:04:34 MDT --- What information is needed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844 User ro@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844#c18 --- Comment #18 from Ruediger Oertel <ro@novell.com> 2008-05-29 10:13:21 MDT --- I guess it's about the question in #15 PS for #14: for the release-tag, I'm using the product name by now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844 User kkaempf@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844#c19 --- Comment #19 from Klaus Kämpf <kkaempf@novell.com> 2008-05-29 10:16:55 MDT --- #15: The version should be removed from the name #14/#18: Whats the 'product name'? We tend to have several ones... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844 User ro@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844#c21 Ruediger Oertel <ro@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Info Provider|dmacvicar@novell.com |kkaempf@novell.com --- Comment #21 from Ruediger Oertel <ro@novell.com> 2008-05-29 10:29:01 MDT --- ad #19: well, I don't write it to a "name" field, I write it to the "id" field as $name-$version really remove version from the id field ? (no problem from my side, just want to avoid misunderstandings) product name in this case is "Marketing-Name" from the maintained-data database, basically free text, usually rather close to the label from the content file. This is not an identifier but clear text. Another option would be ${CD-Product-Name}-${CD-Product-Version} as normally already represented in the filesystem structure for the updates -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844 User ro@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844#c22 --- Comment #22 from Ruediger Oertel <ro@novell.com> 2008-05-30 02:24:14 MDT --- okay, I've seen bug#395413, removing $version from the id field. last open issue/question here is the release / product_name story. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844 User kkaempf@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844#c23 Klaus Kämpf <kkaempf@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Info Provider|kkaempf@novell.com |hmuelle@novell.com --- Comment #23 from Klaus Kämpf <kkaempf@novell.com> 2008-05-30 04:32:52 MDT --- I'd like to see an internal identifier there, denoting the 'base product' or 'core distribution', something like 'common code base' for SLE11. Then we could use this field to determine if the patch is 'appropriate' for a system. But this is really up to Harald to decide if this is wanted or useful. For openSUSE 11.0, we have - openSUSE 11.0 DVD - openSUSE 11.0 FTP - ... and all have 'openSUSE 11.0' as the 'common core'. The latter should be placed in the 'release' field. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844 User hmuelle@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844#c24 Harald Mueller-Ney <hmuelle@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Info Provider|hmuelle@novell.com | --- Comment #24 from Harald Mueller-Ney <hmuelle@novell.com> 2008-06-02 08:51:46 MDT --- At a first glance it sound ok - but I am not sure if I fully understood the design. Let us talk about it at a whiteboard. I would suggest to go through one or two examples. It will help me especially with wording "core distrbution or "common code base" does not sound to smooth ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844 User ro@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384844#c25 Ruediger Oertel <ro@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #25 from Ruediger Oertel <ro@novell.com> 2008-06-02 09:24:33 MDT --- closing for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com