http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951
Summary: [maintenance] Cherrypick fixes from f-spot 0.6.1.4 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.2 Version: Factory Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: GNOME AssignedTo: bnc-team-gnome@forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: vuntz@novell.com QAContact: qa@suse.de Found By: ---
Stéphane mentions it's a nice bug fix release, so we probably want at least some of this as a maintenance update.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951#c1
Stefan Kost ensonic@sonicpulse.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ensonic@sonicpulse.de Severity|Normal |Major
--- Comment #1 from Stefan Kost ensonic@sonicpulse.de 2009-12-07 17:49:31 UTC --- Please update. f-spot 0.6.1.3 which is in 11.2 is unusable.I'll attach two backtraces.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951#c2
--- Comment #2 from Stefan Kost ensonic@sonicpulse.de 2009-12-07 17:52:30 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=331405) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=331405) crash when double clicking images
because of this no image can be looked at in large.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951#c3
--- Comment #3 from Stefan Kost ensonic@sonicpulse.de 2009-12-07 17:53:24 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=331406) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=331406) crash when clicking '+' to import pictures
no picture importing becasue of this
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951#c4
Vincent Untz vuntz@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |maintenance@opensuse.org
--- Comment #4 from Vincent Untz vuntz@novell.com 2009-12-07 17:59:57 UTC --- Maintenance team: f-spot is not officially part of GNOME, but the 0.6.1.x branch is for major bugfixes only. Would it be possible to release an update with the latest 0.6.1.x release?
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951#c5
Gabriel Burt gburt@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gburt@novell.com
--- Comment #5 from Gabriel Burt gburt@novell.com 2009-12-07 18:50:22 UTC --- I would recommend this, too. We are taking 0.6.1.5 for SLED 11 SP1.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951#c6
Magnus Boman captain.magnus@opensuse.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |captain.magnus@opensuse.org
--- Comment #6 from Magnus Boman captain.magnus@opensuse.org 2009-12-07 21:54:31 UTC --- +1 for updating since it is only a bugfix release
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951#c7
--- Comment #7 from Marcus Meissner meissner@novell.com 2009-12-08 08:28:03 UTC --- sounds good to me, especially as there at least is 1 user with problems with it. +1
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951#c8
Swamp Workflow Management swamp@suse.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |maint:running:29443
--- Comment #8 from Swamp Workflow Management swamp@suse.com 2009-12-08 14:58:08 UTC --- The SWAMPID for this issue is 29443. Please submit the patch and patchinfo file using this ID. (https://swamp.suse.de/webswamp/wf/29443)
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951#c9
Christian Dengler cdengler@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW CC| |cdengler@novell.com Info Provider|maintenance@opensuse.org |
--- Comment #9 from Christian Dengler cdengler@novell.com 2009-12-08 14:58:42 UTC --- +1
update process started; be so kind and submit a patchinfo and the fixed sources
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951#c10
Vincent Untz vuntz@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |maintenance@opensuse.org
--- Comment #10 from Vincent Untz vuntz@novell.com 2009-12-10 17:43:24 UTC --- Maintenance team: could you look at the updated package in home:vuntz:11.2-testing?
We didn't want to force an update of the lang package because it's quite big, and this branch of f-spot is string-frozen (so it cannot get worse than the current situation). So we have this now:
+ we require a lang package with a version between the old version and the one in the maintenance update (to make sure we have a lang package, and that either the old one or the new one can be used)
+ we provide f-spot with the old version so that, if the old lang package is installed, there's no requirement to update to the new lang package (keep in mind that a lang package has a "Requires: %{name} = %{version}").
Obviously, this is hacky, but we couldn't find a better solution. What do you think?
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951#c11
--- Comment #11 from Magnus Boman captain.magnus@opensuse.org 2009-12-10 22:48:22 UTC ---
From an update perspective I think this is the right approach. From a packaging
perspective, I don't know if there are better ways to solve this, but will leave that to someone with better knowledge on the topic.
+1 to release with this.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951#c12
--- Comment #12 from Marcus Meissner meissner@novell.com 2009-12-11 09:28:41 UTC --- The -lang package should be released too, the requirements might otherwise become a dependency nightmare.
"807k" as it is in your repo is still an acceptable size I guess.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951#c13
--- Comment #13 from Vincent Untz vuntz@novell.com 2009-12-11 10:04:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12)
The -lang package should be released too, the requirements might otherwise become a dependency nightmare.
Oh, we're not talking about not releasing the -lang package, but about being permissive on which one can be used.
"807k" as it is in your repo is still an acceptable size I guess.
Well, while talking about updates in #opensuse-gnome, we already got feedback from 2 different people that limiting the size would be good, if possible.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951#c14
--- Comment #14 from Christian Dengler cdengler@novell.com 2009-12-11 12:21:42 UTC --- I prefer a complete update. It is an acceptable size.
For one case I think solution 2 is practicable, but if we start with such a thing, we have to do the same for other packages and then we have a higher update risk in the future.
complete update: +1
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951#c15
--- Comment #15 from Magnus Boman captain.magnus@opensuse.org 2009-12-14 22:05:24 UTC ---
From the email conversation on the maintenance list:
"Normally all subpackages are automatically released as part of the update. however, -lang package are usually updated via bundle-lang* updates, so as long as it is not a version update, that should be fine (is it a version update?).
In addition, we have delta rpms, so if the new user had the previous version installed, the download bandwidth should be minimal (as the delta is ~ zero)."
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951#c16
--- Comment #16 from Vincent Untz vuntz@novell.com 2009-12-14 22:29:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15)
From the email conversation on the maintenance list:
"Normally all subpackages are automatically released as part of the update. however, -lang package are usually updated via bundle-lang* updates, so as long as it is not a version update, that should be fine (is it a version update?).
It is a version update, hence the issue :-)
In addition, we have delta rpms, so if the new user had the previous version installed, the download bandwidth should be minimal (as the delta is ~ zero)."
That is true if f-spot-lang is already installed, but that's not true if it's currently provided by bundle-lang-$something.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951#c17
--- Comment #17 from Christian Dengler cdengler@novell.com 2009-12-15 13:55:10 UTC --- We do a whole gnome upgrade and in this case we fight for 807k *confused* ;-)
And it is a standardly not installed package (base setup with gnome). So I think not too many users are affected by this update.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951#c18
--- Comment #18 from Vincent Untz vuntz@novell.com 2009-12-15 14:10:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #17)
We do a whole gnome upgrade and in this case we fight for 807k *confused* ;-)
No, we fight for the general case, not this specific example :-) It's really about setting a policy on how this should be handled in general. It's actually even more important for the GNOME upgrade, since if we make it possible to not upgrade translations, it will be much smaller.
And it is a standardly not installed package (base setup with gnome). So I think not too many users are affected by this update.
F-Spot is installed by default with GNOME, as far as I can tell.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951#c19
--- Comment #19 from Christian Dengler cdengler@novell.com 2009-12-15 14:27:13 UTC ---
No, we fight for the general case, not this specific example :-) It's really about setting a policy on how this should be handled in general. It's actually even more important for the GNOME upgrade, since if we make it possible to not upgrade translations, it will be much smaller.
I wrote an email. Vincent you are on cc. We should discuss it as a separate problem to find a policy for the handling.
F-Spot is installed by default with GNOME, as far as I can tell.
YES! f-spot but not f-spot-lang (I think ;-) )
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951#c20
Marcus Meissner meissner@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |meissner@novell.com
--- Comment #20 from Marcus Meissner meissner@novell.com 2009-12-15 15:02:56 UTC --- as we do a 0.6.1.5 version upgrade, and 0.6.1.5 has this changes: f-spot 0.6.1.5 - Nov 4 2009 - What Next ?
* bugfix release for 0.6.x branch o make IconView responsive to mouseclicks on gdk 2.18 (bgo #600032) o do not ignore .rw2 files (bgo #593474) o avoid an Array.OORE on empty dbs (bgo #566977) (Mike Gemuende)
f-spot 0.6.1.4 - Oct 29 2009 - Dedication
* bugfix release for 0.6.x branch o keep sorting on startup (bgo #598714) (Lorenzo) o fix a NRE on LastRollDialog (bgo #598009) (Jordi Mas) o fix the toolbar 2.28-ification (bgo #591421) (Michael Monreal) o accept --sync as comandline parameter o avoid crashing on AdjustTimeDialog (bgo #591402) o allow more than 60 pictures per Facebook albums o backported translations
.. aka it has translaiton updates ...
So we of course should also release the translations.
Once we have done both f-spot and GNOME versionm updates we will also push bundle-lang-gnome-* updates for people installing later to get less updates.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951#c21
--- Comment #21 from Dirk Mueller dmueller@novell.com 2009-12-15 22:53:07 CET --- we have to do a bundle-lang* update then at the same time. my suggestion would be to combine this with the general gnome 2.28.2 update.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951#c22
--- Comment #22 from Vincent Untz vuntz@novell.com 2009-12-16 10:12:39 UTC --- (replying to the last few comments)
(In reply to comment #19)
No, we fight for the general case, not this specific example :-) It's really about setting a policy on how this should be handled in general. It's actually even more important for the GNOME upgrade, since if we make it possible to not upgrade translations, it will be much smaller.
I wrote an email. Vincent you are on cc. We should discuss it as a separate problem to find a policy for the handling.
Okay.
F-Spot is installed by default with GNOME, as far as I can tell.
YES! f-spot but not f-spot-lang (I think ;-) )
You're missing the issue, it seems. We have this in f-spot.spec: Requires: f-spot-lang = %{version} f-spot 0.6.1.3 is installed, and f-spot-lang 0.6.1.3 is provided by bundle-lang-gnome-fr. Now, if I update to f-spot 0.6.1.5, I will need f-spot-lang 0.6.1.5 too. So, unless we update bundle-lang-gnome-*, I will need to download f-spot-lang.
(In reply to comment #20)
So we of course should also release the translations.
Yes, nobody is saying the opposite. We're just arguing about making it possible to download less data for the updates for people who would like to do so.
[and again, yes, for this specific case, we might want to just wait for the whole GNOME update and handle that with bundle-lang-* updates]
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951#c23
--- Comment #23 from Dirk Mueller dmueller@novell.com 2009-12-16 11:24:24 CET --- yep, we have to be careful with version updates. updating bundle-lang-gnome* at the same time should however help with this (needs testing though).
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951#c
Christian Dengler cdengler@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Info Provider|maintenance@opensuse.org |
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951#c24
--- Comment #24 from Christian Dengler cdengler@novell.com 2009-12-22 17:31:28 UTC --- What to do here. Should we reject it and pick it up with the gnome-upgrade?
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951#c25
Vincent Untz vuntz@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |maintenance@opensuse.org
--- Comment #25 from Vincent Untz vuntz@novell.com 2010-01-05 13:42:04 UTC --- It was agreed to try the proposed approach and see how it goes. I've submitted the package (sr#28041). But I just found out there's no swamp id for this issue.
Do you want to wait for the GNOME upgrade? If no, may I ask for a swamp id? Thanks!
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951#c26
--- Comment #26 from Marcus Meissner meissner@novell.com 2010-01-05 13:44:06 UTC --- lets keep it seperate. +1 to go
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951#c27
Christian Dengler cdengler@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Info Provider|maintenance@opensuse.org |
--- Comment #27 from Christian Dengler cdengler@novell.com 2010-01-05 15:44:05 UTC --- see comment 8 ;-)
The SWAMPID for this issue is 29443. Please submit the patch and patchinfo file using this ID. (https://swamp.suse.de/webswamp/wf/29443)
As Marcus said, go on ;-)
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951#c28
Vincent Untz vuntz@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #28 from Vincent Untz vuntz@novell.com 2010-01-05 16:11:31 UTC --- Ah, there were so many comments I didn't see this old one. Patchfinfo filled, and package was already submitted (sr#28041).
=> closing.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951#c29
Swamp Workflow Management swamp@suse.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|maint:running:29443 |maint:running:29443 | |maint:released:11.2:29902
--- Comment #29 from Swamp Workflow Management swamp@suse.com 2010-01-11 12:19:56 UTC --- Update released for: f-spot, f-spot-debuginfo, f-spot-debugsource, f-spot-lang Products: openSUSE 11.2 (debug, i586, x86_64)
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951#c
Swamp Workflow Management swamp@suse.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|maint:running:29443 |maint:released:11.2:29902 |maint:released:11.2:29902 |
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550951#c30
--- Comment #30 from Bernhard Wiedemann bwiedemann@suse.com --- This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration: This bug (550951) was mentioned in https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/28041 11.2:Test / f-spot
-
bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com