[Bug 473714] New: wvdial fails to update DNS if NetworkManager is enabled.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714 Summary: wvdial fails to update DNS if NetworkManager is enabled. Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.1 Version: Final Platform: x86 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.1 Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Network AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening@forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: Uniacke1@yahoo.ca QAContact: qa@suse.de Found By: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.5) Gecko/2008121300 SUSE/3.0.5-1.1 Firefox/3.0.5 Using wvdial to connect to dial-up internet results in a nameserver failure error from wvdial. If nameservers are manually added to /etc/resolv.conf, connection works normally. Wvdial has auto dns option enabled, and disabling networkManager via YAST causes the connection to work properly without the need to manually add nameservers. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.launch wvdial to connect to ISP on system with network manager enabled. After connecting, wvdial states 'Warning, no nameserver found '/etc/resolv.conf' Nameserver (DNS) failure, your connection may not work", though wvdial receives IP and DNS addresses from ISP. Actual Results: As described Expected Results: Nameservers should be added to /etc/resolv.conf after connection. This worked fine in SuSE 10-11, first broken in 11.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714
User dominique.leuenberger@tmf-group.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714#c1
Dominique Leuenberger
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714
Martin Vidner
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714
User aj@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714#c2
Andreas Jaeger
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714
User dominique.leuenberger@tmf-group.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714#c3
--- Comment #3 from Dominique Leuenberger
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714
User Uniacke1@yahoo.ca added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714#c4
B. Wielens
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714
User aj@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714#c5
Andreas Jaeger
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714
User dominique.leuenberger@tmf-group.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714#c6
--- Comment #6 from Dominique Leuenberger
So, let me restate: Use the traditional setup if you need this to work.
Yaiks... BT modems are mostlyu sed (I guess :) ) on notebooks, where NM is almost mandatory to be used (office network, home network, wifi at the airport and so on) and in cases nothing else is available you (at least me) fall back to GPRS over BT connection. For the time being I think I stay with 'wvdial and then fixing /etc/resolv.conf'. Is there a good way to tell the system that 'there is a connection' so that FF does not believe to have the need to work in offline mode? (also other apps..) I think there was a d-bus call that could be issued for this
to have Modem support in NM is a feature request, and let's move it to Tambet for that.
Great. Thanks for this. Tambet: if you need any help in testing, feel free: I'm here and looking forward in being able to use this feature ;) so far NM supports Mobile Broadband, but it's not possible to use it over a BT connected 'modem'. I think that the upstream discussed 'Modem Manager' might be of some uise here? (there was some upstream work in trunk, but not in the 0.7 series). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714
User tambet@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714#c7
--- Comment #7 from Tambet Ingo
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714
User Uniacke1@yahoo.ca added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714#c8
--- Comment #8 from B. Wielens
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714
User tambet@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714#c9
Tambet Ingo
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714
User Uniacke1@yahoo.ca added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714#c10
--- Comment #10 from B. Wielens
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714
User Uniacke1@yahoo.ca added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714#c11
--- Comment #11 from B. Wielens
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714
User Uniacke1@yahoo.ca added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714#c12
B. Wielens
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714
User tambet@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714#c13
Tambet Ingo
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714
User Uniacke1@yahoo.ca added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714#c14
--- Comment #14 from B. Wielens
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714
User tambet@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714#c15
--- Comment #15 from Tambet Ingo
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714
User aspiers@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714#c16
--- Comment #16 from Adam Spiers
Is there a good way to tell the system that 'there is a connection' so that FF does not believe to have the need to work in offline mode? (also other apps..) I think there was a d-bus call that could be issued for this
I have searched high and low on the internet for a way of doing this, but despite finding many other people who also need it, I found no solution, and I couldn't find docs on the NetworkManager dbus methods either. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714
User tambet@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714#c17
--- Comment #17 from Tambet Ingo
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714
User Uniacke1@yahoo.ca added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714#c18
--- Comment #18 from B. Wielens
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714
User aspiers@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714#c19
--- Comment #19 from Adam Spiers
No. These applications use NetworkManager API to determine the online/offline state and if the connections is brought up using some other means, NM has no way of knowing about it. It is not possible to tell NM "lie to apps and say we're online", because then it'll need to provide all the other details as well (like IP configuration, routes, DNS, ...), handle global state (like default route, resolv.conf), and monitor the connection to change the status when the connection goes down. All that can be summarized with "add support for the device in NM", so if someone is up to it, NM gladly accepts patches.
Ah - I was thinking that the "we're online" message was a "push" broadcast on dbus from NM, but from what you're saying it sounds like it's a "pull" the other way around, i.e. firefox/pidgin etc. individually ask NM for the current network status. Did I understand that right? Why do programs like firefox/pidgin need to know any more than the offline/online toggle bit though? Surely resolv.conf, routes etc. are irrelevant to them? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714
User tambet@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714#c20
--- Comment #20 from Tambet Ingo
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714
User aspiers@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473714#c21
--- Comment #21 from Adam Spiers
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com