[Bug 549905] New: legacy code referencing /etc/modprobe.d/sound file still in /etc/init.d/alsasound file
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549905 Summary: legacy code referencing /etc/modprobe.d/sound file still in /etc/init.d/alsasound file Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.2 Version: RC 1 Platform: i686 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.2 Status: NEW Severity: Minor Priority: P5 - None Component: Sound AssignedTo: tiwai@novell.com ReportedBy: lee_matheson@hotmail.com QAContact: qa@suse.de Found By: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.3) Gecko/20090909 SUSE/3.5.3-3.1 Firefox/3.5.3 There is still legacy code still in /etc/init.d/alsasound referring to /etc/modprobe.d/sound file, even though that file has been depreciated (no longer in) openSUSE-11.2 as the file is now called /etc/modprobe.d/50-sound.conf. This may have no impact. ... I'm just trying to understand how the /etc/modprobe.d/50-sound.conf file was loaded, and I stumbled upon this code when I did an "grep -i modprobe * " in the /etc/init.d directory. I am not a programmer. Is this intended to remain? Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. go to /etc/init.d directory and type: grep -i modprobe * 2. 3. Expected Results: This has no impact that I know about. It is just confusing for someone trying to understand. Possibly the code is deliberate for backward compatibility? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549905
User tiwai@novell.com added comment
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549905#c1
--- Comment #1 from Takashi Iwai
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549905
Takashi Iwai
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549905
User tiwai@novell.com added comment
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549905#c2
Takashi Iwai
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549905
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549905#c3
--- Comment #3 from Bernhard Wiedemann
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com